22.06.06, 18:22
It seems Kurski's attempts to damage Donald Tusk (for me still one of the
more decent Polish politicians) and PO come back in his face as a boomerang.
Billboardgate is now threathening the master duck himself... what a joke.
Obserwuj wątek
    • usenetposts Re: PZU 23.06.06, 23:02
      I think this all came out while I was away in Moscow. Could anyone bring me up
      to speed on it?
      • ja_karola Re: PZU 24.06.06, 23:19
        In short, Kurski accused the PO of using the PZU billboards, which they
        allegedly purchased at a better price, for their election campaign. After a bit
        of digging, what came out was that Tusk bought 8,000 billboards for 6 million
        zl. while Kaczynski paid 1 million zl for 12,000 billboards. So who’s cheating?

        The billboardgate may become grounds for impeachment although the reasons for it
        may not be as interesting as the Lewinskygate.

        wiadomosci.gazeta.pl/wiadomosci/1,53600,3439279.html
        • usenetposts Re: PZU 25.06.06, 00:28

          Thanks for that. Grounds for impeachment? Seems a bit rich.

          I seem to remember a whole load of Tusk billboards, but I thought they were an
          antyreklama anyway, as no-one taught the guy to smile.
          • minimus Re: PZU 27.06.06, 13:38
            > I seem to remember a whole load of Tusk billboards, but I thought they were
            an
            > antyreklama anyway, as no-one taught the guy to smile.

            Smile? We are a gloomy nation, remember?
        • usenetposts Re: PZU 25.06.06, 00:31
          ja_karola napisała:

          > In short, Kurski accused the PO of using the PZU billboards, which they
          > allegedly purchased at a better price, for their election campaign. After a bi
          > t
          > of digging, what came out was that Tusk bought 8,000 billboards for 6 million
          > zl. while Kaczynski paid 1 million zl for 12,000 billboards. So who’s ch
          > eating?

          Either way, the billboard owners are the ones who are cheating.

          We are talking about in the cheaper case 833 zlotys for a single billboard, for
          say two months.

          That way, you could actually pay for the billboard itself and the land it
          stands on in about a year's rent. They must be in superprofits.
          • ja_karola Re: PZU 25.06.06, 06:07
            You're right; the billboard owners (PZU) are quite the swindlers!
            According to my calculations however, Tusk paid 750 zl/billboard while Kaczynski
            83.33zl/billboard (silly goose actually starting an investigation). HUGE
            difference! PZU directors are the ones deserving an impeachment for using
            double standards and obvious siding with PiS.
            • usenetposts Re: PZU 25.06.06, 13:25
              If we agree that even 83.33 PLN per board is enough to give the provider of the
              media a perfectly good return on investment, then it would be tough to impeach
              the media providers with doing an arms-length deal with Kaczory. If it were
              resold at undervalue, then it should have been declared as a donation, which
              may not have been allowed by the statute of PZU or national law. I am not up to
              speed on who is and who isn't allowed to make party donations.

              For me what it shows is that Tusk isn't competent to purchase advertising
              space - he pays 9 times what is necessary. A person like this couldn't be
              trusted to run a business, let alone a country.
              • sobieski010 Re: PZU 27.06.06, 12:29
                From the "Polish Outlook" of 27.06.06:

                13 million billboards carrying advertisements for the election of Polish
                President Kaczynski were paid for by one firm run by one woman and which firm
                had no employees. The firm is registered in a rundown residence in one town and
                operated from a residence in another town. And the Polish press is trying to
                find out what is going on.
                In a move that was apparently an opening shot by the Law and Justice Party,
                which, until just recently, a Polish president was a member, for the fall local
                elections, a member of Law and Justice Party accused the leading opposition
                party Civic Platform of illegal campaign financing of billboards used to
                advertise the Civic Platform presidential candidate, Donald Tusk. And Donald
                Tusk did not take this lying down. He made counter charges.
                And the journalists began their search to find the facts.
                The Polish edition of Newsweek carried the results of an investigation done by
                reporters for Newsweek that has opened many eyes and generated many questions in
                Poland. It took them some time to find the company that had handled the payments
                for the 13 million billboards that were placed all around Poland for the Polish
                presidential campaign of Polish President Lech Kaczynski. They founded the
                company was registered in a dilapidated and uninhabited residence. And then took
                them more time find the owner of the company will live in another town. The
                company is claimed by the woman owner to have existed for five years, have no
                employees, and to have been operating illegally for its entire time in existence.
                That 13 million billboards with casts of the hands of a one-woman firm with to
                help employees has raised red flags around Poland and journalists are scrambling
                to get the full background on the financing of the presence billboards. What
                started out as an attack by Law and just this party against the Civic Platform
                has now turned into a defensive action by the Law and Justice Party against the
                prying eyes of inquisitive Polish journalists.
                The reaction all Law and Justice Party at the higher levels is that they did not
                know what was going on. It would seem that the next step in this battle is for
                the journalist to find out really how much they did not know.
              • minimus Re: PZU 27.06.06, 13:37
                > For me what it shows is that Tusk isn't competent to purchase advertising
                > space - he pays 9 times what is necessary. A person like this couldn't be
                > trusted to run a business, let alone a country.

                Your right. In Poland if your honest your a sucker. You have to be at least
                cwany to get ahead.
            • gfunkallstars Re: PZU 27.06.06, 23:18
              ja_karola napisała:
              You're right; the billboard owners (PZU) are quite the swindlers!

              Since when have PZU been billboard owners? I think you have got your wires
              crossed somewhere.
              • ja_karola Re: PZU 28.06.06, 03:32

                Generally politicians hire PR firms for their election campaigns. Neither Tusk
                nor Kaczynski bought billboard space personally so we cannot speculate who is a
                better businessman. If we use the names Kaczynski or Tusk it’s simply for the
                sake of brachylogy. In the case of PO, the purchase was done by PR firms News
                Outdoors and Clear Channel and none of them worked for the PZU campaign “Stop
                wariatom drogowym” (“Stop road madmen?”wink. PZU is accused of financing the PiS
                election campaign because the billboard space was resold at undervalue and PiS
                was accused of buying this space at an unusually low price.

                The PZU campaign was serviced by firms AMS and Stroer and following the halt of
                this controversial campaign, the billboards were plastered with PiS posters. The
                PZU bought the billboard space for 50 mln zl. thus becoming owners of the space.
                Once the slogan “Stop road pirates” was changed to “stop road madmen” (a
                self-destructive change) and the Polish Psychiatric Association was notified to
                intervene, the campaign was stopped due to accusations of political
                incorrectness and insensitivity to the mentally ill. The billboard space was
                subsequently resold at 3% of its original value. Quite a good deal wouldn’t you
                say?

                We’ll see who profited from this scam as the investigation unfolds. We’ll see
                why the slogan was changed, who was behind it all and just how much the
                taxpayers lose from all this.
                • usenetposts Re: PZU 28.06.06, 13:01
                  I must say I think you write extremely well, karola. I am finding out most of
                  what I know about this from your treatment of it.

                  It looks like becoming a case study in how to cover-up your donations and your
                  true advertising spend.

                  I remember commenting at the time of the PZU "road madmen" campaign that I
                  thought it was highly offensive. I can't rmember if I did that here or
                  elsewhere, but I think it was here.
                  • ja_karola Re: PZU 29.06.06, 05:24
                    usenetposts napisał:

                    > I must say I think you write extremely well, karola. I am finding out most of
                    > what I know about this from your treatment of it.

                    Thanks Dave; a true complement when coming from you.
                    I'm sad to say that I'll be checking in only sporadically from now on as I'm
                    getting ready for the big move to Copenhagen. I should be there by mid-August
                    but I have a million things to do before then.

                    In the meantime, as you may have noticed from subsequent posts, my mom has taken
                    over the computer. Hopefully it was a one-time invasion... she usually sticks
                    to kobieca polonia.

                    Cheers!
                    K.
                • gfunkallstars Re: PZU 28.06.06, 16:31
                  ja_karola napisała:

                  >
                  > Generally politicians hire PR firms for their election campaigns. Neither Tusk
                  > nor Kaczynski bought billboard space personally so we cannot speculate who is a
                  > better businessman. If we use the names Kaczynski or Tusk it’s simply for
                  > the
                  > sake of brachylogy. In the case of PO, the purchase was done by PR firms News
                  > Outdoors and Clear Channel and none of them worked for the PZU campaign “
                  > Stop
                  > wariatom drogowym” (“Stop road madmen?”wink. PZU is accused of f
                  > inancing the PiS
                  > election campaign because the billboard space was resold at undervalue and PiS
                  > was accused of buying this space at an unusually low price.
                  >
                  > The PZU campaign was serviced by firms AMS and Stroer and following the halt of
                  > this controversial campaign, the billboards were plastered with PiS posters. Th
                  > e
                  > PZU bought the billboard space for 50 mln zl. thus becoming owners of the space
                  > .
                  > Once the slogan “Stop road pirates” was changed to “stop roa
                  > d madmen” (a
                  > self-destructive change) and the Polish Psychiatric Association was notified to
                  > intervene, the campaign was stopped due to accusations of political
                  > incorrectness and insensitivity to the mentally ill. The billboard space was
                  > subsequently resold at 3% of its original value. Quite a good deal wouldn̵
                  > 7;t you
                  > say?
                  >
                  > We’ll see who profited from this scam as the investigation unfolds. We&
                  > #8217;ll see
                  > why the slogan was changed, who was behind it all and just how much the
                  > taxpayers lose from all this

                  I realise all this having kept up with the news on it. That's why I was
                  surprised at your post saying that PZU were the billboard owners.

                  I agree that selling the space at such a huge discount was a great deal for
                  someone but I don't think it automatically means there was some kind of "układ"
                  at work as certain politicians have suggested. Tour operators sell their unsold
                  holidays as "last minute" with huge discounts so why shouldn't other companies
                  do the same. It seems perfectly logical to sell something you've bought but
                  can't use for a discount in order to try and recoup losses rather than let it go
                  to waste.
              • babiana Re: The hit dog howls 28.06.06, 16:23
                I advise the SLD troll to click on Google PZU, afera.You will find 293 000
                results on 32 pages. Even I'm fluent in Polish I would not have patience to read
                all this data. This institution is plagued by corruption scandals since 1999
                when its privatization process has started. Billboardgate is of less importance
                in comparison to previous ones. PZU was the biggest insurance company handling
                60% of insurance market in Poland (24% in Central Europe). This fact explains
                why PZU is a subject to so many scandals. Privatization of PZU was another
                example which showed how far could reach feelers of businessmen with communist
                safe conduct in their pockets.
                • gfunkallstars Re: The hit dog howls 28.06.06, 18:44
                  babiana napisała:

                  > I advise the SLD troll to click on Google PZU, afera.You will find 293 000
                  > results on 32 pages. Even I'm fluent in Polish I would not have patience to rea
                  > d

                  An SLD troll! You are hilarious. I don't have an SLD bone in my body and
                  although I may not contribute as often as some people, I am no troll.

                  Is Waldek back with a new name?
                  • babiana Re: The hit dog howls 28.06.06, 19:07
                    gfunkallstars napisał:

                    > babiana napisała:
                    >
                    > > I advise the SLD troll to click on Google PZU, afera.You will find 293 00
                    > 0
                    > > results on 32 pages. Even I'm fluent in Polish I would not have patience
                    > to rea
                    > > d
                    >
                    > An SLD troll! You are hilarious. I don't have an SLD bone in my body and
                    > although I may not contribute as often as some people, I am no troll.
                    >
                    > Is Waldek back with a new name?

                    Accept my apologies. I am just Karola's mother.
                    • gfunkallstars Re: The hit dog howls 28.06.06, 22:25
                      > Accept my apologies.I am just Karola's mother.

                      OK. I was insulted but it is also quite funny. The first time I suffered an
                      unprovoked cyber attack!

                      Your son posts nicely and is seems to be a well educated and polite guy. Where
                      did he learn his manners?
                      • babiana Re: The hit dog howls 29.06.06, 04:57
                        gfunkallstars napisał:

                        > > Accept my apologies.I am just Karola's mother.
                        >
                        > OK. I was insulted but it is also quite funny. The first time I suffered an
                        > unprovoked cyber attack!
                        >
                        > Your son posts nicely and is seems to be a well educated and polite guy.
                        Where did he learn his manners?

                        First of all, karola is my daughter (not son) and I’m pleased to say that I can
                        take some credit for her good manners.

                        My problem is that the communist state has taught me to always read between the
                        lines and I may be a bit oversensitive, but I sensed some post-communist siding
                        in your posts. When you compared PZU (one of their last bastion) to tour
                        operators last minute unsold holidays, it upset me. Perhaps my judgment was too
                        harsh or perhaps you may not understand the complexity of this scandal. In the
                        end though I had a good laugh out of all this, but perhaps I should stick to my
                        regular forum; Kobieca Polonia.
              • babiana Re: the hit dog howls 28.06.06, 16:26
                My post was the answer to gfunkallstars

Nie masz jeszcze konta? Zarejestruj się


Nakarm Pajacyka