US RAELSCY MASS MORDERCY !!

Gość: ZAJAC NAPASC NA IRAQ: TU NIE CHODZI O NAFTE GLUPCY...... IP: 207.44.132.* 09.11.04, 14:27

NAPASC NA IRAQ: TU NIE CHODZI O NAFTE GLUPCY

The Iraqi War:
It's not about the oil, stupid!
by David Duke
Broadcast Date 11-29-2002
www.davidduke.com/radio

Representative David Duke at Al-Jazeera Satellite Network in Qatar

I just returned from Bahrain and Qatar. In Qatar I appeared on one of the most-
watched television satellite channels in the world, Al-Jazeera. An audience of
70 million saw and listened to me expose the Jewish supremacist traitors in the
U.S. Government who have sold out America to Israel. In violation of the United
States Constitution, the Jewish-dominated U.S. State Department actually
protested my appearance and tried to suppress my freedom of speech as an
American citizen. More on that a little later, but first, I want to turn to one
of the big lies about the coming war on Iraq, that lie is that Big Oil
interests, rather than the Zionists, are behind the planned war.

The Zionists are masters at deception. Like the bait-and-switch sales tactics
of American retail giants, some elements of the Jewish-dominated media in
America have floated the idea that the coming war in Iraq is about oil.
Sounding like a genuine dissident viewpoint, some patriots have unwittingly
help spread this myth. One antiwar pundit adopted this theory and
headlined, "It's about oil, stupid!"

These claims were originated simply to deflect the blame for the war from
Israel and its fifth column in America. The warmongers anxiously want this war
NOT to appear to be the result of the Israeli Fifth Column trying to strike
down Israel's enemies one by one. By floating the idea that the war is about
oil, a resource vital to America and Europe, the suggestion is that somehow it
is in America's and Europe's economic interest to invade Iraq. The implication
is that the war will somehow allow us to grab the oil, and so it will be good
for the economy and the common man. Of course, the idea that we will just grab
the oil is simply preposterous. Whatever new regime is in charge of Iraq will
sell the oil at normal world spot prices!

A lot of good antiwar people have been deceived by this tactic, and are
parroting the idea that it is big Oil that really behind this war. The Bush
family ties to the oil industry are often cited in this scenario. And frankly,
it is one thousand times easier in America to speak about conspiracies of the
big bad Oil companies than to speak of the more open and more obvious Jewish
conspiracies. Talk about big Oil conspiracies and some will call you wrong, but
no one will accuse you of the great blasphemy of our age, the most evil of all
heresies: so-called "anti-Semitism."

But really, does big Oil or America have a strong economic motivation for this
war? A few obvious facts coupled with plain, old-fashioned reason will show you
that the war against Iraq holds no real advantage for big Oil, in fact it
offers them much peril. As far as concerning American and European economic
interests at large, the war in Iraq will have devastating consequences, to say
nothing of causing anti-American political unrest and horrendous terrorism.
Today, I will exam the economic consequences of the Iraqi war. The first
question is "Do we have to go to war with Iraq to get its oil?" The answer
is: "Of course we don't." We bought oil from Saddam Hussein before the Gulf
War, and we can buy it now. If America, by this war, makes a regime change in
Iraq, the American government is not simply going to pump the oil out of the
ground and put the proceeds in our treasury. Those in political control in Iraq
will still control the oil and still sell it to the world at the international
prevailing spot oil prices.

And let me make this very clear, Iraq has the second largest oil reserves in
the world. Giving Iraqi oil easier access to the world's markets will, after
the flurry of wartime higher oil prices, eventually depress the price of oil.
What does this mean to the big American and European oil companies who have the
great bulk of their oil investments in the United States (such as in Texas,
Louisiana and Alaska), in the North Sea, in Russia and in South America?
Opening up the Iraqi market (and Iraq will need to sell huge quantities of oil
after the war devastation) will ultimately mean, bottom line, depressed prices
for oil reserves that Big Oil actually owns! The war will not help their
profits but in the long run only hurt them. That is why Russia, a nation with
large oil reserves but less Jewish influence, rightly opposes the war, knowing
it will ultimately hurt their own oil business.

So, in the final analysis, Big Oil has no long-term interest in the overthrow
of Saddam. And it must be admitted that Big Oil has no strong interest in
normalizing relations with Iraq either. For if America normalizes relations
with the current Iraqi regime, the oil will flow freely, just as it would if
sanctions lifted after a so-called regime change. Either way, regime change or
normalized relations would not necessarily be good for the Big Oil companies.
However, more oil on the market and resulting lower prices would be incredibly
good for the American and European economy. Energy costs are one of the biggest
expenses of our economy and civilization. Lower energy costs translate into
lower prices, more money for wages, schools, and the other needs of society. If
30% of a company's expenses are energy related, and energy costs fall by a
third, that company's revenues increase by 20 percent. That's more money for
wages, and also somewhat lower prices that help everyone's standard of living.

Imagine if we offered to end the war and sanctions against Saddam and normalize
relations in exchange for special lower oil prices for the next decade.
Obviously, Saddam would jump at that opportunity

So, if Europe and America wants Iraqi oil and wants it at good prices, we can
easily get it by ending sanctions against Iraq and returning to the quite cozy
relationship we had before the Gulf War. And, if we demanded UN inspections and
disarmament of BOTH Iraq and Israel for their weapons of mass destruction,
suddenly the Israeli fifth column would quiet their demands against Iraq,
because Israel is far more committed to their illegal weapons of mass
destruction than is Iraq. Iraq has now ok'd inspections. I can't even imagine
Israel ever doing that!

On the other hand, a regime change would also certainly open up the oil
pipelines, but after the change there would not be the motivation to negotiate
as good an oil price as with the Saddam government. Iraq has a tremendous
incentive to make a very good oil deal for us right now. Once the regime
changes, the incentive is gone. Look at recent history. We certainly cannot and
will not force a new regime to give us bargain prices for oil. As always, in
normal times oil will be bought and sold on the international oil market. But
now, of course, we a very special case, America has a lot of leverage to make a
deal with Saddam Hussein: a deal he couldn't refuse!

Contribute online at: www.whitecivilrights.com/donate.shtml

Drzewko
Od najstarszego
Od najnowszego

Gość: TOMASZ POLSKO JESTES NA BARDZO ZLEJ DRODZE !! IP: 66.98.180.* 09.11.04, 14:25

CZY PAMIETACIE CO HITLEROWSCY FASZYSCI
ZROBILI Z WARSZAWA W CZASIE POWSTANIA??

DZISIAJ IDENTYCZNIE TO SAMO ROBIA AMERYKANSCY
ZJANO-FASZYSCI W FALLUTIA, IRAK

ZJONISTA ZYD KWASNIEWSKI BIERZE CZYNNY UDZIAL
W TYM LUDOBUJSTWIE IRACKIEJ LUDNOSCI.

POLSKO JESTES NA BARDZO ZLEJ DRODZE !!
Gość: ZAJAC NAPASC NA IRAQ: TU NIE CHODZI O NAFTE GLUPCY...... IP: 207.44.132.* 09.11.04, 14:27

NAPASC NA IRAQ: TU NIE CHODZI O NAFTE GLUPCY

The Iraqi War:
It's not about the oil, stupid!
by David Duke
Broadcast Date 11-29-2002
www.davidduke.com/radio

Representative David Duke at Al-Jazeera Satellite Network in Qatar

I just returned from Bahrain and Qatar. In Qatar I appeared on one of the most-
watched television satellite channels in the world, Al-Jazeera. An audience of
70 million saw and listened to me expose the Jewish supremacist traitors in the
U.S. Government who have sold out America to Israel. In violation of the United
States Constitution, the Jewish-dominated U.S. State Department actually
protested my appearance and tried to suppress my freedom of speech as an
American citizen. More on that a little later, but first, I want to turn to one
of the big lies about the coming war on Iraq, that lie is that Big Oil
interests, rather than the Zionists, are behind the planned war.

The Zionists are masters at deception. Like the bait-and-switch sales tactics
of American retail giants, some elements of the Jewish-dominated media in
America have floated the idea that the coming war in Iraq is about oil.
Sounding like a genuine dissident viewpoint, some patriots have unwittingly
help spread this myth. One antiwar pundit adopted this theory and
headlined, "It's about oil, stupid!"

These claims were originated simply to deflect the blame for the war from
Israel and its fifth column in America. The warmongers anxiously want this war
NOT to appear to be the result of the Israeli Fifth Column trying to strike
down Israel's enemies one by one. By floating the idea that the war is about
oil, a resource vital to America and Europe, the suggestion is that somehow it
is in America's and Europe's economic interest to invade Iraq. The implication
is that the war will somehow allow us to grab the oil, and so it will be good
for the economy and the common man. Of course, the idea that we will just grab
the oil is simply preposterous. Whatever new regime is in charge of Iraq will
sell the oil at normal world spot prices!

A lot of good antiwar people have been deceived by this tactic, and are
parroting the idea that it is big Oil that really behind this war. The Bush
family ties to the oil industry are often cited in this scenario. And frankly,
it is one thousand times easier in America to speak about conspiracies of the
big bad Oil companies than to speak of the more open and more obvious Jewish
conspiracies. Talk about big Oil conspiracies and some will call you wrong, but
no one will accuse you of the great blasphemy of our age, the most evil of all
heresies: so-called "anti-Semitism."

But really, does big Oil or America have a strong economic motivation for this
war? A few obvious facts coupled with plain, old-fashioned reason will show you
that the war against Iraq holds no real advantage for big Oil, in fact it
offers them much peril. As far as concerning American and European economic
interests at large, the war in Iraq will have devastating consequences, to say
nothing of causing anti-American political unrest and horrendous terrorism.
Today, I will exam the economic consequences of the Iraqi war. The first
question is "Do we have to go to war with Iraq to get its oil?" The answer
is: "Of course we don't." We bought oil from Saddam Hussein before the Gulf
War, and we can buy it now. If America, by this war, makes a regime change in
Iraq, the American government is not simply going to pump the oil out of the
ground and put the proceeds in our treasury. Those in political control in Iraq
will still control the oil and still sell it to the world at the international
prevailing spot oil prices.

And let me make this very clear, Iraq has the second largest oil reserves in
the world. Giving Iraqi oil easier access to the world's markets will, after
the flurry of wartime higher oil prices, eventually depress the price of oil.
What does this mean to the big American and European oil companies who have the
great bulk of their oil investments in the United States (such as in Texas,
Louisiana and Alaska), in the North Sea, in Russia and in South America?
Opening up the Iraqi market (and Iraq will need to sell huge quantities of oil
after the war devastation) will ultimately mean, bottom line, depressed prices
for oil reserves that Big Oil actually owns! The war will not help their
profits but in the long run only hurt them. That is why Russia, a nation with
large oil reserves but less Jewish influence, rightly opposes the war, knowing
it will ultimately hurt their own oil business.

So, in the final analysis, Big Oil has no long-term interest in the overthrow
of Saddam. And it must be admitted that Big Oil has no strong interest in
normalizing relations with Iraq either. For if America normalizes relations
with the current Iraqi regime, the oil will flow freely, just as it would if
sanctions lifted after a so-called regime change. Either way, regime change or
normalized relations would not necessarily be good for the Big Oil companies.
However, more oil on the market and resulting lower prices would be incredibly
good for the American and European economy. Energy costs are one of the biggest
expenses of our economy and civilization. Lower energy costs translate into
lower prices, more money for wages, schools, and the other needs of society. If
30% of a company's expenses are energy related, and energy costs fall by a
third, that company's revenues increase by 20 percent. That's more money for
wages, and also somewhat lower prices that help everyone's standard of living.

Imagine if we offered to end the war and sanctions against Saddam and normalize
relations in exchange for special lower oil prices for the next decade.
Obviously, Saddam would jump at that opportunity

So, if Europe and America wants Iraqi oil and wants it at good prices, we can
easily get it by ending sanctions against Iraq and returning to the quite cozy
relationship we had before the Gulf War. And, if we demanded UN inspections and
disarmament of BOTH Iraq and Israel for their weapons of mass destruction,
suddenly the Israeli fifth column would quiet their demands against Iraq,
because Israel is far more committed to their illegal weapons of mass
destruction than is Iraq. Iraq has now ok'd inspections. I can't even imagine
Israel ever doing that!

On the other hand, a regime change would also certainly open up the oil
pipelines, but after the change there would not be the motivation to negotiate
as good an oil price as with the Saddam government. Iraq has a tremendous
incentive to make a very good oil deal for us right now. Once the regime
changes, the incentive is gone. Look at recent history. We certainly cannot and
will not force a new regime to give us bargain prices for oil. As always, in
normal times oil will be bought and sold on the international oil market. But
now, of course, we a very special case, America has a lot of leverage to make a
deal with Saddam Hussein: a deal he couldn't refuse!

Contribute online at: www.whitecivilrights.com/donate.shtml
- Gość: Tysprowda Re: NAPASC NA IRAQ: TU NIE CHODZI O NAFTE GLUPCY. IP: 193.188.161.* 09.11.04, 14:50
  
  Co prowda to prowda.
  
  Nie chodzi o nafte, ale o jej dwa razy wyzsze ceny.
  
  No i dwa razy wyzsze ceny wody wkrotce.
  
  Wody ktorej jest w Irakoriko skolko ugodno.
  
  Juz nie mowie o euro, ktorym Saddam handlowal za rope gdy ropa kosztowala
  polowe tego co teraz.
  
  Euro to bron masowego razenia dolara, co widac gdy 1.0 euro razi 1.3 masy
  dolara.
Gość: igor Podobno nic bardziej nie cieszy niz glupota innych IP: *.detroit-19rh15rt.mi.dial-access.att.net 09.11.04, 14:50

Forum polskie zapewnia to codziennie jak rysunki Mleczki. Zadne wypowiedzi nie
wnosza nic nowego ale najbardziej uderza fakt bezsilnosci krytykow USA. Nie ma
bowiem ani jednej rozsadnej propozycji co mozna zrobic aby zmienic sytuacje na
zgodna z ich pumktem widzenia. W kazdej, szczegolnie globalnej, polityce licza
sie fakty. USA prowadzi swoja polityke, zgodna z interesami demokracji
amerykanskiej. Polityke obrony swoich interesow prowadzi kazde panstwo i nikt
nie powinien byc tym zdziwiony. Roznica polega tylko na tym ze Stany zostawily
reszte bylych poteg w tyle i moga one tylko krzyczec o "imperializmie". Francja
uprawia jednak swoj "imerializm" w Afryce, Rosja w Czeczeni itd. Roznica skali
prowadzenia wlasnej polityki miedzynarodowej jest tylko roznica mozliwosci.

Najnowsze z forum Świat

Zaloguj się