Gość: ZJP
IP: *.dialup.foxinternet.com
08.11.02, 17:28
The Marquis de Lafayette who came here to fight in our Revolution said, "The
welfare of America is closely bound up with the welfare of mankind." Today,
however, I suspect he would reverse that to say that the welfare of mankind
is bound up with the welfare of America.
In a recent column about Europe, Thomas Friedman of The New York Times wrote
of "the new anti-Americanism, a blend of jealousy and resentment of
America's overwhelming economic and military power." One German editor calls
it the "Axis of Envy." The bottom line, said Friedman, is that "Many
Europeans today fear, or detest, America more than they fear Saddam."
For some time now, whenever we have read or heard a news story about Europe,
it is usually about its refusal, nation by nation, to cooperate with the
United States, to berate the United States, and to cling to some very
outdated and unrealistic notions. We used to think the Europeans were our
allies, but they are really more like our spiteful, poor relations.
The resentment Europeans feel reflects the fact that America is the future
and Europe is the past.
This is brought into sharp focus in a brilliant analysis, "Old and In the
Way," by Karl Zinsmeister. It appears in the December edition of The
American Enterprise\ul \ulnone (www.TAEmag.com). Zinsmeister is the
magazine's editor-in-chief and has the happy facility of taking very
complicated subjects and clarifying them. The magazine is published by the
American Enterprise Institute and is devoted to politics, business, and
culture.
"If Europeans want to ban the death penalty," writes Zinsmeister, "that's
fine with Americans; but don't ask us to follow the same dictate. If
Europeans think selling military technology to North Korea and Iran, and
helping Libya and Iraq with their oil industries is a good idea, expect not
a shred of support from the US. If Europeans believe their determination to
send billions of dollars to Yasser Arafat is likely to speed peace in the
Middle East, we won't stop them."
This is, of course, precisely what the Europeans have been doing in the face
of every indication that the nations with whom they are doing business want
an Islamic Europe or, in the case of North Korea, have demonstrated once
again that no Communist nation can be trusted.
Zinsmeister points out that the elites who run Europe have an exaggerated
belief in the power of diplomacy. This is odd considering the last century's
history in which European diplomacy failed to deter two World Wars. If war
is simply a different form of diplomacy (we've tried talking to Saddam) then
we are soon to apply it to the one man who has given the United Nations the
opportunity to prove beyond any doubt its utter impotence and irrelevance.
The UN is the world's epicenter of blather