Słowiańscy Żydzi

[borebitsy]

Tropiąc śladynea ndertalczyka nasuwa mi się powiedzmy spostrzeżenie:

Wspólnota żydowska składała się z dwóch dość wyraźnie różnych (wymieszanych)
populacji.
Khazarzy którzy ulegli konwersji musieli zawierać czesć genów słowińskich.
Ostatecznie teren gdziebyli był przynajmiej terenem przemrszów słowian,lub
może nawet ich bytowania. Ta część populacji uległa exterminacji. Natomiast
wąskogłowa część, zgodna z nazistowskim modelem uber-mensha przeżyła w
wiekszym stopniu. Oglądając zdjęcia Żydów z obozów widzę że róznią się one od
populacji jaka ocalała z zagłady.

dziwne to dość
www.islamdenouncesantisemitism.com/images/bcg6.jpg
może ktoś zainteresowany związkami słowińsko żydowskimi może wskazać jakąś
kolekcję przedwojenych zdjęć różnych żydowskich wspólnot.

Niemiecka koncepcja ewolucji była nacechowana poważnymi podstawowymi błedami.
Głowny z nich to celowość ewolucji. A nie jej losowy przebieg w ktorym trudno
jest a priori określić co bądzie lepszą podstawą wyjściową, co będzie lepszym
zespołem genetycznym na przyszłość.

[borebitsy]

Negowanie neandertalczykawiąże się z nazizmem. Oto mały dowód:

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/spelling.html

The Neander Tal was named after a minister, Joachim Neumann, who used to take
walks there in the late 17th century. Neumann composed many hymns, some of
which are still sung today. Wanting to use a Greek pseudonym, Neumann, whose
name means "new man", chose "Neander", a translation of his name into Greek. By
a strange coincidence, the "New Man Valley" named for him after his death gave
its name to a new type of human that was discovered there.

http://www.sfwriter.com/mcgregor.jpg

http://www.sfwriter.com/hotal.htm


Ernst Haeckel http://en.wikipedia.org/upload/7/71/ErnstHaeckel.jpg

http://en2.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ernst_Haeckel

Although Haeckel's ideas are important to the history of evolutionary theory
and he was a competent invertebrate anatomist, almost all the speculative
concepts that he championed have turned out to be incorrect. Haeckel
hypothesized, described and named, hypothetical ancestral micro-organisms that
have not been found and almost certainly do not exist. His concept of
recapitulation has been disproved. Haeckel did not support "survival of the
fittest" instead believing in a Lamarckian inheritance of acquired
characteristics. On top of picking the wrong theories to support, he was caught
using doctored data in some of his papers.

Haeckel's speculative ideas and possible fudging of data, plus lack of
empirical support for many of his ideas, tarnished his scientific credentials.
However, he remained an immensely popular figure in Germany and was considered
a hero by his countrymen.

Gymnasium "Ernst Haeckel" - einziges Gymnasium mit
http://www.ehg-jena.de/start.htm

Haeckel became one of the more prolific and vociferous supporters of evolution,
but was less supportive of natural selection as the mechanism by which
evolution occured. Hacekel was certainly an evolutionist but less so a
Darwinian.

Haeckel is one of many thinkers who believed that all species were historical
entities (lineages) but did not share Darwin's enthusiasm for natural selection
as the main mechanism for generating the diversity of the biological world.
Haeckel instead believed that the environment acted directly on organisms,
producing new races (a version of Lamarckism). The survival of the races did
depend on their interaction with the environment, a weak form of natural
selection


Korzenie nazizmu w blednej interpretacji ewolucji Hackel'a
http://home.snafu.de/bifff/Hirsengl.htm

Hirschfeld followed Haeckel

It was not only Nietzsche's concept of the superman that fascinated Hirschfeld,
but also the social-darwinism of Ernst Haeckel, a precursor of the Nazis,
honorary president of the Gesellschaft für Rassenhygiene and honoured by the
Nazis as the "pioneer of biological policy". Hirschfeld honoured his idol
Haeckel by naming a hall in his Institut für Sexualwissenschaft (Institute for
Sexology) in Berlin the "Ernst-Haeckel-Saal". In this hall, in the 20s and
early 30s, Hirschfeld and others gave their eugenic advice lectures to the
public. In the early 30s, when Hirschfeld travelled the world and propagated
his ideas overseas, the heads of his Institute and of the Ärztliche
Gesellschaft für Sexalwissenschaft und Eugenik/Konstitutionsforschung (that was
founded by Hirschfeld, Grotjahn, Iwan Bloch and others; honorary member also:
Haeckel) invited the heads of the notorious Kaiser-Wilhlem-Institut für
Anthropologie, the racists Eugen Fischer and Othmar von Verschuer, to lecture
on eugenics. Fischer and Verschuer worked their way up in the Nazi state:
Verschuer became assistant of the Auschwitz physician Josef Mengele. There is
no political virginity in German sexology, as the DGSS tries to make believe,
today.

Ojcowie Nazizmu przychylni Zydom
Hirschfeld agreed with the Nazis that it was necessary to avoid the birth
of "disabled" persons, but he didn't agree that to be a Jew was a taint.


ROBERT REMAK , zyd maial wplyw na poglady Hackela
Robert Remak, the first Jew to beappointed professor at the University
ofBerlin, discovered the three layers fromwhich human embryos develop.
ErnstHaeckel, a philosopher as well as anembryologist, became famous for
thecontroversial theory that ontogeny (indi-vidual development) recapitulates
phy-logeny (the development of a species orrace).

Glebszy filozoficzny problem,miedzy absolutnaprawda a relatywna funkcja jezyka

In the “science wars” of the 1990s,social historians argued with
scientistsabout how much truth science actuallycontains. Scholars studying
language andculture insisted that science holds trueonly in the context of the
society that cre-ated it. Scientists protested that gravityand menstruation are
real, not constructsof language


===

In 1991 and again in 1997 Swiss and German anthroposophists re-issued the 1931
book Das Rätsel des Judentums ('The Mystery of Jewry') by Ludwig Thieben, one
of Austria's leading anthroposophists in Steiner's day. Jewish organizations
and civil rights groups protested this ugly tract, which decries the "far-
reaching negative influence of the Jewish essence," alleges that Jews have "an
anti-christian predisposition in their blood," and holds Jews responsible for
the "decline of the West."50 The anthroposophist publisher threatened the
protesting organizations with a lawsuit.

With a public face that is seemingly of the left, anthroposophy frequently acts
as a magnet for the right. Loyal to an unreconstructed racist and elitist
philosophy, built on a foundation of anti-democratic politics and pro-
capitalist economics, and purveying mystical panaceas rather than social
alternatives, Steiner's ideology offers only disorientation in an already
disoriented world. Anthroposophy's enduring legacy of collusion with ecofascism
makes it plainly unacceptable for those working toward a humane and ecological
society.


First two quotes from Daniel Gasman, The Scientific Origins of National
Socialism: Social Darwinism in Ernst Haeckel and the German Monist League, New
York 1971, pp. 16-17; third quote from George Mosse, Toward the Final Solution,
Madison 1985, p. 87. Haeckel's virulent racism is also extensively documented
in Richard Lerner, Final Solutions: Biology, Prejudice, and Genocide,
Philadelphia 1992.
Gasman, p. 31 and 23. See also the classic account from an anthroposophist
perspective: Johannes Hemleben, Rudolf Steiner und Ernst Haeckel, Stuttgart
1965.

===
MMunich’s ultranationalist far right; it housed the headquarters of the Thule
Society, one of the most militant völkisch groups, and was indeed owned by
Thule members.23) Some contemporary anthroposophists even claim that Steiner’s
attackers belonged to the Thule Society.24) But no matter who was in fact
responsible for the aborted disruption of Steiner’s lecture, his own choice of
venue is difficult to explain if one views Steiner as an anti-nationalist who
abjured far right politics. Furthermore, several prominent Thule Society
members had direct ties to Steiner and anthroposophy, including Steiner’s
mentor Ernst Haeckel and Rudolf Hess, anthroposophy’s chief ally during the
Third Reich.

How are we to make sense of this convoluted situation? As we have already
indicated, in the interwar period the organizational outlines of the
reactionary nationalist-occult spectrum were thoroughly porous, with competing
groups displaying a substantial overlap in membership and ideology.
Anthroposophy was a part of this spectrum, as were several of the direct
precursors to the Nazis. Goodrick-Clarke offers an illuminating example of this
crossover: In 1923, immediately after moving to Germany, the Russian
antisemitic conspiracy theorist and oc

[borebitsy]

the Russian antisemitic conspiracy theorist and occultist Gregor
Bostunitsch "became an enthusiastic Anthroposophist" (Occult Roots of Nazism,
p. 170). By the end of the decade Bostunitsch had turned on anthroposophy,
seeing it as yet another cog in the international occult conspiracy; he later
became a colonel in the SS.

216.239.41.104/search?
q=cache:A3peN9b9digJ:www.stelling.nl/simpos/anthroposophy_nazism_criticism.htm+%
22Ernst+Haeckel%22+jew&hl=en&ie=UTF-8

====
Richard Gordon
A Poignant Week in Vienna

I spent a week in Vienna at the end of April, 2000, as a guest of the Austrian
Institute for Nonlinear Studies, a group of three neat scientists exploring the
fundamentals of physics and evolution. I was their keynote speaker for their
10th anniversary at an international cybernetics conference (European Meetings
on Cybernetics and Systems Research). I almost didnÆt come. As a Jew, I was
rather upset by the turn towards fascism in Austria.


I had little time for sightseeing. I went off to the Natural History Museum,
which is wonderful, reminding me of the Field Museum in Chicago, where I grew
up. The Director has prepared a window with copies of plates from: Haeckel, E.
(1904). Kunstformen der Natur/Art Forms of Nature, Leipzig: Verlag des
Bibliographischen Instituts. The young ladies giving an insect demonstration
told me of his keen interest in Ernst Haeckel, which I share.

216.239.41.104/search?q=cacheK6nafsF7mAJ:www.mip.at/en/dokumente/1503-content.html+%22Ernst+Haeckel%22+jew&hl=en&ie=UTF-8
====

Odrzucajac Neandertlskie cechy promowano OUT OF AFRICA men:
ije.oupjournals.org/cgi/content/full/30/1/37
History of ‘race hygiene’
In the second half of the 19th century, ‘Social Darwinism’ had spread
throughout Europe. This theory assumed that nations, like animal species, fight
for the survival of the fittest. The fittest nation would be the one that is
genetically the ‘purest’. German proponents of Social Darwinism were to expand
the theory significantly: Alfred Ploetz coined the term ‘race hygiene’
(Rassenhygiene), Ernst Haeckel was the first to consider the killing
of ‘weaklings’,1 and the physician Fritz Lenz formulated his concept of racial
inequality which directly influenced Hitler.2 Binding and Hoche finally lobbied
for the extinction of ‘life unworthy of living’3 suggesting that this could be
a curative measure (Heilbehandlung) not necessarily requiring consent from its
victims. Growing anti-Semitism and ‘Social Darwinism’ added together resulted
in ‘race hygiene’. As the word implies, ‘race hygiene’ was essentially a
medical issue.

Involuntary sterilization
To stop the ‘contamination’ of the German people by ‘inferior’ blood, forced
sterilization was legalized on 14 July 1933, soon after Hitler took power in
January 1933, through the ‘Law for the Prevention of Genetically Diseased
Offspring’ (Gesetz zur Verhütung erbkranken Nachwuchs). The quick move had been
possible because of much preparatory work during the Weimar Republic, initiated
not least by the medical profession.6 The law provided that (allegedly)
handicapped individuals were to be identified, examined by a jury of ‘experts’
and subsequently sterilized. Some 200 ‘Genetic Health Courts’ were instituted.
They ordered the involuntary sterilization of approximately 400 000
individuals. In 1934 alone, 28 286 men and 27 958 women thus became the victims
of involuntary sterilization.7 The overwhelming majority of the medical
experts' reports were later found to be of unacceptable scientific quality;
almost all had recommended sterilization.6 It is estimated that 50 000 women
were forced into eugenically directed abortion

===
Haeckel was politically a conservative nationalist. He was an avid
supporter of Otto von Bismarck and he remained a supporter of the
Kaisers right up to the end of WW I. He lived to see the failed German
revolution of 1919 and was horrified to see a Jew, Kurt Eisner take power
in the short-lived Soviet Republic of Bavaria. As far as I can tell
Haeckel's version of social Darwinism primarily involved the attempt to apply
Darwinian principle to international relations

Although Haeckel himself leaned to the right politically he was
influential amongst German intellectuals all across the political
spectrum. Kautsky was simply one of the many intellectuals on
the left who were influenced by him.
====

ARIAN tylko ze to nie Niemcy a HG3 geny sa rozprzestrzenione w indiach. Gdyby
nazisci zechcieli zastoswac swoja eugenike powinni sami siebie wyeliminowac

The roots of the Holocaust lie in the following concepts. First, race is the
major determinant of history. This view was expounded by the French diplomat
and essayist Artur de Gobineau (1816-1882). The Aryan (a term given to the
Teutonic or Nordic strain of the Caucasian race) was superior to all others but
corrupted by intermarriage. Second was Social Darwinism. This view sees all
life, both human and animal, engaged in a mortal struggle for survival; those
who are best fit in this struggle are the victors. According to Ernst Haeckel
(1834-1919) the superior races are the most developed. These need to be helped
by social policies which kill the sick and very weak.

The dominance of Western Europe over other areas, their military industrial and
scientific accomplishments, seemed to be proof to the Social Darwinist of the
superiority of Germanic peoples. Since these people spoke an Indo-European
language, Aryan, tracing its roots back to Sanskrit, a view evolved that the
Aryans were the culture builders and the Germans the purest of them.

Third was the eugenics movement founded by a brilliant Englishman, the cousin
of Charles Darwin, Francis Galton (1822-1911). In 1883, he coined the
term "eugenics," referring to a program of improving the human race by genetic
means. He believed that heredity was far more important than environment in
human development. Galton expounded that the state and society should do all
that is necessary to improve the human race, particularly espousing selective
parenthood. The eugenics movement became embedded in racial terminology.

www.chgs.umn.edu/Educational_Resources/Newsletter/The_Genocide_Forum/Yr_2/Year_2__No_4/year_2__no_4.html
====

Khazarskie antagonizmy

[borebitsy]

Za morzem kaspijskim żyli Khazarzy (khazastan). Ich nazwa podobnie jak Veneci
(niebiescy) pochodzi od koloruoczu (orzechowi).

Ich strefa wpływówsasiadowała z błękitnmi. Podobno Vonich Manuscript zawiera
treści odnoszące się do tego okresu. Podobno bo aczkolwiek dla mnie
transparentne nie zanalazłem potwierdzeń dla J Sojko mimo olbrzymiej
sciemniającejdyskusji nad tą misterną książką.

Czy są inne źródła przekazy, legendy?
Przysłowia
Na pochyłe drzewo wszyskie kozy skaczą.
Gdyby kózka nie skakała toby nóżki nie złamała.
Trafiła kosa na kamień.
Raz kozie smierć.


Na pochyłedrzewo wszyskie kozy skaczą.
Drzewo to symbol słowiański, rusowiema mają je nawet na ramionach Ibin Faladen.
No cóż niebiescy musieli być zaskoczeni khazyodnoszą czasmi sukcesy. Okresten
to początek naszej ery do 700 ad.

Trafiła kosa na kamień.

Kosa koza a kamień to symbol błekitnych kamienny tron,symbol obieralnego
władcy. Dlaczego kamienny? Długo miejsca nie zagrzejeż. Wódz był obierany tylko
na wypadek wojny. A błekitni przez tysiąclecia nie potrzebowali warownych
osiedli a ich dominacja byłą uznawana aż do Chin.

Raz kozie smierć.

Aczkolwiek spokrewniwni etnicznie musieli się poróznić. Domieszka południowej
krwi zniszczyła genetyczną empatię.