drapieznik
21.06.05, 19:23
wrecz zlosliwy zeby nie powiedziec wstretny:
"Marriage is only one of the many issues where social scientists go astray,
especially since they fail to see marriage for what it really is – a sexual
union, based primarily on genital love. They prefer to ignore that fact and
merely view it as an economic union or means to perpetuate the human race.
Actually very few people marry for money or to have children; marriages of
today really limit peoples’ freedom and may lead to economic deprivation.”
Tylko tyle pwoeidzial jeden, ze wspolpracownikow Frueda. Taa, takie cos to
moizna przeczytac tylko na P2. Acha, to bylo powiedziane tak na oko 60 lat
temu przez goscia uznanego za szarlatana. No ale co mozna sie po 'takim'
spodziewac.