HIV, a seks analny- najniebezpieczniejszy- czemu??

[Gość: licealista]

Wszędzie, gdzie czytam, jest napisane: "Seks analny jest uważany za
najbardziej niebezpieczny", pytam- dlaczego.
Może ktoś z Was zna odpowiedź na to pytanie??
pozdrawiam

[Gość: Artur]

Duzo latwiej uszkodzic sluzowke przy tej formie seksu. Bo HIV wymaga kontaktu z krwia dla udanego zakazenia.

[Gość: synergy]

Artur napisał(a):

> Duzo latwiej uszkodzic sluzowke przy tej formie seksu.
> Bo HIV wymaga kontaktu. z krwia dla udanego zakazenia.

Bzdury klepiesz!

HIV nigdy nie zostal nigdy odizolowany, HIV nie istnieje, wiec HIV
nie moze powodowac zakazenia!

Przestan powtarzac bzdury medycznych Nazzi i rzeznikow!

Course of Events on January 15th 2001 at the District Court (Landgericht) of

Dortmund:

Judge Hackmann announced the statement of the "Bundesgesundheitsbehörde", the
Federal German Health Authorities, which says that in connection with AIDS
there has never been isolated a virus (Dr. Marcus, Robert-Koch-Institute (RKI)
Berlin). The judge figured out that the German Bundestag had been backing the
lie of the Federal Health Authorities (RKI, Dr. Marcus, 9.3.95) about a
successful isolation of a virus in connection with AIDS in the course of a
petition (Art. 17, Constitution of the Federal Republic of Germany, Pet. 5-13-
15-2002 010526).


The trial was based on actions of the defendant which were caused by the
misleading statement made by the RKI (Dr. Marcus) on the 9th March 1995, that
there were photographs of the isolated HI-virus inside the publications of
Montagnier (1983) and Gallo (1984). The judge proved the untruthfulness of this
statement using Dr. Marcus' statement itself. The court imposed a suspended
sentence of 8 months of jail because of attempted coercion of the authorities
to adhere and act according to law and order.

www.campaignfortruth.com/latestnews/krafeldandlanka.htm

"So for a long time I studied virology, from the end to the beginning, from
the beginning to the end, to be absolutely sure that there was no such thing as
HIV.

And it was easy for me to be sure about this because I realized that the whole
group of viruses to which HIV is said to belong, the retroviruses

[Gość: Artur]

Wolalbym bys wlasne problemy medyczne zalatwial (zalatwiala) ze swoim lekarzem a nie na forum.

[Gość: synergy]

Artur napisał(a):

> Wolalbym bys wlasne problemy medyczne zalatwial (zalatwiala) ze swoim
> lekarzem a nie na forum.

Nie ma zadnego dowodu naukowego ze ja mam problemy medyczne, natomiast
ty masz zdecydowanie problemy psychiatryczne.

Kieruj sie NAUKA a nie glupota lekarska.

Nie slyszales ze nie ma wiekszego glupka niz ci ktorzy dostaja
dyplomy medycyny?

MOZE POJDZIESZ DO PSYCHIATRY I ZALATWISZ WSZYSTKICH PROBLEMY MEDYCZNE.
CIEBIE ULECZA I NIKT NIE BEDZIE WIECEJ CHOROWAL ...

Przeczytaj sobie OPINIE naukowe prawdziwych naukowcow i nie bedziesz
pisal BZDUR o wirusach ktore nie istnieja!

Nie mozesz sie zarazic WIRUSEM ktory nie istnieje!

[...]

[Gość: synergy]

Wiadomość została usunięta ze względu na złamanie prawa lub regulaminu.

HIV a kokosy

[jedrus1a]

Licealista:
Polecam stronkę
www.surawka.republika.pl/
Dział artykuły:
Przy końcu listy jest artykuł o kokosach (No. 4)
Tam jest coś o HIV

Pozdro.
Jędruś

[Gość: AGATA]

O co Ci chodzi Synergy. Kwestionujesz istnienie wirusa HIV. W takim razie jak
to możliwe , ze niektórzy są zarażeni.

[Gość: synergy]

AGATA napisał(a):

) O co Ci chodzi Synergy. Kwestionujesz istnienie wirusa HIV. W takim razie jak
) to możliwe , ze niektórzy są zarażeni.

To nie ja kwestionuje istnienie wirusa, tylko prawdziwi naukowcy.

AIDS nie jest spowodowane wirusem.

Przeczytaj sobie opinie prawdziwych naukowcow a nie opinie pol
inteligentow ktorzy zabijaja ofiary braku inteligencji!
http://www.think-fitness.de/html/hiv_never_isolated.html

http://www.campaignfortruth.com/latestnews/krafeldandlanka.htm

http://www.neue-medizin.com/lanka2.htm

HIV nie istnieje, AIDS jest spowodowane zatruciem toksycznym po
infekcji GRZYBKIEM (FUNGI) a nie wirusem.

Dr. Stefan Lanka jest GENIUSZEM ktory udowodnil brak inteligencji
wsrod ZNACHOROW ktorzy maja dyplomy potwierdzajace ze uczeszczali na
kursy medycyny.

Judge Hackmann announced the statement of the "Bundesgesundheitsbehrde", the
Federal German Health Authorities, which says that in connection with AIDS
there has never been isolated a virus (Dr. Marcus, Robert-Koch-Institute (RKI)
Berlin). The judge figured out that the German Bundestag had been backing the
lie of the Federal Health Authorities (RKI, Dr. Marcus, 9.3.95) about a
successful isolation of a virus in connection with AIDS in the course of a
petition (Art. 17, Constitution of the Federal Republic of Germany, Pet.5-13-15-
2002-010526).
The trial was based on actions of the defendant which were caused by the
misleading statement made by the RKI (Dr. Marcus) on the 9th March 1995, that
there were photographs of the isolated HI-virus inside the publications of
Montagnier (1983) and Gallo (1984). The judge proved the untruthfulness of this
statement using Dr. Marcus' statement itself. The court imposed a suspended
sentence of 8 months of jail because of attempted coercion of the authorities
to adhere and act according to law
and order.

The document of the German Bundestag DS 12/8591 holds proof that the Bundestag
had already known in 1994 that neither Montagnier (1983) nor Gallo (1984) had
isolated any virus in connection with AIDS.

It is impossible - as far as laboratory conditions are concerned-to develop a
valid Virus-antibody-test, if the virus has not been isolated before.
Every layman understands that an individual proof for an infection with a virus
is impossible, if the existence of the virus has never been generally proven.
This knowledge of the German health authorities, that the tests are not
validated, can be proven via the authorities' documents themselves. The error
concerning the test's validity is spread and supported by the authorities-
against better knowledge.



http://www.think-fitness.de/html/hiv_never_isolated.html

http://www.sickofdoctors.addr.com/articles/lanka_interview1.htm


Sad w District Court (Landgericht) Dortmund nie skazal Dr. Marcus, z Robert-
Koch-Institute (RKI) Berlin "Bundesgesundheitsbehörde", the Federal German
Health Authorities, na osiem miesiecy wiezienia dlatego ze HIV
powoduje AIDS, a tylko dlatego ze udowodniono ze HIV nie istnieje, wiec
nie moze powodwac AIDS, i ze leczac zdrowych ludzi uzywajac AZT
popelniaja masowe morderstwo!


Do tej pory NIE ISTNIEJE zaden medyczny test aby potwierdzic ze ktos
cierpi na AIDS, bo test na HIV jest po prostu jeszcze jednym OSZUSTWEM
medycznym!


Science, Medicine and Human Rights, Germany
Wissenschaft, Medizin und Menschenrechte e.V.
Officially registered humanitarian organisation

President: Karl Krafeld, Albrechtstr. 17, D-44137 Dortmund
Vice-President: Dr. Stefan Lanka, Ludwig-Pfaustr.1b, D-70176 Stuttgart
T 0711 2220601
F 0711 2220600
M 0171 3281070
e [e-mail]

To the OHCHR-UNOG
The Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, Mary Robinson
The United Nations Centre for Human Rights, United Nations Office at Geneva
8-14 Avenue de la Paix
1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland

To all Heads of Government and all Heads of State
To all NGOs

Legal proceedings against the "Deutscher Bundestag", the Parliament of the
Federal Republic of Germany: Because of the intentional continuation of acts of
killing and manslaughter (§ 220a StGB Germany) by the German Parliament.

During the last six years proofs have been collected for the following actions
that have taken place inside Germany: The State intentionally is using non-
valid tests to persuade healthy persons to take a deadly long-term medication.
The persons, being healthy before being tested die during the long-term-
medication. The German Parliament, since years intentionally is securing that
this crime continues.

Course of Events on January 15th 2001 at the District Court (Landgericht) of
Dortmund:
Judge Hackmann announced the statement of the "Bundesgesundheitsbehörde", the
Federal German Health Authorities, which says that in connection with AIDS
there has never been isolated a virus (Dr. Marcus, Robert-Koch-Institute (RKI)
Berlin). The judge figured out that the German Bundestag had been backing the
lie of the Federal Health Authorities (RKI, Dr. Marcus, 9.3.95) about a
successful isolation of a virus in connection with AIDS in the course of a
petition (Art. 17, Constitution of the Federal Republic of Germany, Pet. 5-13-
15-2002 010526).


The trial was based on actions of the defendant which were caused by the
misleading statement made by the RKI (Dr. Marcus) on the 9th March 1995, that
there were photographs of the isolated HI-virus inside the publications of
Montagnier (1983) and Gallo (1984). The judge proved the untruthfulness of this
statement using Dr. Marcus' statement itself. The court imposed a suspended
sentence of 8 months of jail because of attempted coercion of the authorities
to adhere and act according to law and order.


The document of the German Bundestag DS 12/8591 holds proof that the Bundestag
had already known in 1994 that neither Montagnier (1983) nor Gallo (1984) had
isolated any virus in connection with AIDS. Based on this the Bundestag
safeguarded the persistent lie of the AIDS information campaign (RKI) from 9th
March 1995 about the successful isolation of a virus in connection with AIDS.
As a consequence of non-tolerating this lie and because of non-tolerating the
deadly consequences of this lie, the trial took place on 15th January 2001.


It is impossible – as far as laboratory conditions are concerned – to develop a
valid Virus-antibody-test, if the virus has not been isolated before. Every
layman understands that an individual proof for an infection with a virus is
impossible, if the existence of the virus has never been generally proven. This
knowledge of the German health authorities, that the tests are not validated,
can be proven via the authorities' documents themselves. The error concerning
the test's validity is spread and supported by the authorities – against better
knowledge.


With two more petitions the Bundestag safeguarded the default of the
responsible authorities, not to carry out the law (§63 AMG, Stufenplan II), to
do studies and observations to protect persons taking the AIDS-Medicine, the
chemotherapy AZT (Pet. 5-13-15-2002-058744 and Pet. 5-13-15-212-023567a).


The health authorities and the Bundestag know that there will be no test method
to prove an HIV-Infection, as long as HIV has not been isolated. And there is
no doubt that AZT – as well as the HIV-medications in general – are deadly
themselves when used as long-term-medication.
In the course of the proceedings of the petitions the Bundestag created an
apparent peace of law – by means of deliberately untruthful statements.
President of the German Parliament Wolfgang Thierse regards untruthful
behaviour of this kind (as shown by the Bundestag)

[Gość: synergy]

AGATA napisał(a):

> O co Ci chodzi Synergy. Kwestionujesz istnienie wirusa HIV. W takim razie jak
> to możliwe , ze niektórzy są zarażeni.

To nie ja kwestionuje istnienie wirusa, tylko prawdziwi naukowcy.

AIDS nie jest spowodowane wirusem ktory udowodniono nie istnieje.

With two more petitions the Bundestag safeguarded the default of the
responsible authorities, not to carry out the law (§63 AMG, Stufenplan II), to
do studies and observations to protect persons taking the AIDS-Medicine, the
chemotherapy AZT (Pet. 5-13-15-2002-058744 and Pet. 5-13-15-212-023567a).


The health authorities and the Bundestag know that there will be no test method
to prove an HIV-Infection, as long as HIV has not been isolated. And there is
no doubt that AZT – as well as the HIV-medications in general – are deadly
themselves when used as long-term-medication.
In the course of the proceedings of the petitions the Bundestag created an
apparent peace of law – by means of deliberately untruthful statements.
President of the German Parliament Wolfgang Thierse regards untruthful
behaviour of this kind (as shown by the Bundestag) as being justified by the
Bundesverfassungsgericht (Federal Constitutional Court). A videotape
documenting an interview (28th June 1995) shows that his predecessor in office,
Prof. Rita Süssmuth did know, that there had never been any proofs for a virus
in connection with AIDS and that there are no proofs for the claims of
infectivitiy.

Still pending in the Bundestag is the petition Pet. 2-14-15-212-02608. It is
lodging a complaint against the legal authorities, which stayed passive after
getting the attention of the proofs for these act of killings. Enclosed with
the complaint were so many proofs, which had made it necessary for the
Bundestag to take actions right after perusal, to stop the continuation of
these acts of killings by the state. Within the last six months every single
member of the German Bundestag was informed six times via mail about these acts
of killing by the state.


The intention of the German Bundestag to safeguard killings by the state after
gaining insight into the facts must be regarded as proven, especially because
of the fact that several petitions were rejected by means of untruthful
statements. The German Bundestag and every individual member of the Bundestag
intentionally safeguards acts of killings by the state by deliberately
misleading the public. Healthy people are intentionally lead into a deadly
medication via tests with invalid results - and then die.


The criminal law of the BRD and especially § 220a StGB (Genocide) protects
citizens from act of killings organised by a state which is deliberately
misleading the public. It also protects the citizens binding the legal
authorities to take actions after perusal. The prosecuting attorneys attended
the trial on 15th January 2001 at the Landgericht Dortmund and learned about
the facts – in front of the public. Their passivity afterwards serves as a
further proof for their further intention in this matter. (LG Dortmund, Ns 70
Js 878/99 14(XVII) K 11/00)
Karl Krafeld und Dr. Stefan Lanka, Dortmund und Stuttgart, den 14.3.2001