Gość: IAP News IP: *.NYCMNY83.covad.net 09.01.04, 16:22 Israeli Professor - 'We Could Destroy All European Capitals' By Nadim Ladki 2-6-3 (IAP News) Odpowiedz Link Zgłoś Obserwuj wątek Podgląd Opublikuj
Gość: Konrad? Re: bomby atomowe na Europe ? IP: *.telia.com 09.01.04, 17:04 To prawda? To trzeba na nich bombe , wystarczy jedna w celu prewentywnym. Sama wypowiedz kwalifikuje ich do zniszczenia na pyl. Odpowiedz Link Zgłoś
marcus_crassus islamic co for pale.??f??w ogole for >coo???<????? 09.01.04, 17:16 widze ze chlopaki arafata spuscili z tonu...w 1948 byli pewni wygranej,dostali wpiernicz,w 1967 dostali lomot w dupe,w 1973 znow sie rozochocili i skonczylo sie tak jak zwykle --> czyli dostali lomot... teraz zas Saddam gnije w US areszcie,libia sie poddala,reszta krajow zatoki wiernie sklada holdy "wielkiemu szatanowi" no i palestynki jak ladnie juz leza i piszcza "kwiiiik,bija nas,łojojojojoj,ale nas piora" :))))))) ciezko chlopakom z hamasow sie wiedzie,a to na swieta dostana prezencik od zydow w postaci rakietki w samochodzik,a to swietujac nowy rok zydki strzelili pare rac i ustrzelili paru bandziorkow.... a teraz bandziorki biegaja i rycza ze strachu ze ich zydki bija...a bylo nie zaczynac...i znow dostali lomot... :))))))) ******************************************************************************* a izrael wyrasta na mocarstwo swiatowe --> Ruscy przez bron atomowa awansowali do grona poteg swiatowych mimo ze za grzyba do nich nie pasuja...Izrael ze swoim arsenalem i technologia bedzie niedlugo potega swiatowa... a wy gromadko lewackich smrodkow mozecie sie najwyzej w tylek cmoknac :DDDD Odpowiedz Link Zgłoś
Gość: WEEKLYSTANDARD Re: islamic co for pale.??f??w ogole for >coo? IP: *.NYCMNY83.covad.net 09.01.04, 21:08 Login email: Password: Remember me Register | Forgot password? | Change Password | Update Email What Wolfowitz Really Said From the June 9, 2003 issue: The truth behind the Vanity Fair "scoop." by William Kristol 06/09/2003, Volume 008, Issue 38 Increase Font Size Printer-Friendly Email a Friend Respond to this article www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/002/757wzfan.asp AS THIS MAGAZINE goes to press, a controversy swirls about the head of Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz. He is alleged to have "revealed," in an interview with writer Sam Tanenhaus for the Manhattan celebrity/fashion glossy Vanity Fair, that the Bush administration's asserted casus belli for war against Saddam Hussein--the dictator's weapons-of-mass-destruction program--was little more than a propaganda device, a piece of self-conscious and insincere political manipulation. Lazy reporters have been following the lead of the press release Vanity Fair publicists circulated about their "scoop." It begins as follows: Contradicting the Bush administration, Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz tells Vanity Fair that weapons of mass destruction had never been the most compelling justification for invading Iraq. As it happens, this is a not-quite-accurate description of a paragraph in Tanenhaus's article, which itself bears reprinting for reasons that will become obvious in a moment: When we spoke in May, as U.S. inspectors were failing to find weapons of mass destruction, Wolfowitz admitted that from the outset, contrary to so many claims from the White House, Iraq's supposed cache of WMD had never been the most important casus belli. It was simply one of several reasons: "For bureaucratic reasons we settled on one issue, weapons of mass destruction, because it was the one reason everyone could agree on." Everyone meaning, presumably, Powell and the Joint Chiefs of Staff. "Almost unnoticed but huge," he said, is another reason: removing Saddam will allow the U.S. to take its troops out of Saudi Arabia, where their presence has been one of al-Qaeda's biggest grievances. Let's be clear: Though Paul Wolfowitz has friends and admirers at The Weekly Standard, we would be surprised and more than a little distressed had he actually said what he's supposed to have said in this instance. For the last 12 years, all specific and sometimes heated policy disagreements notwithstanding, American presidents of both parties, joining a near-unanimous consensus of the so-called "world community," have agreed that the Baath party regime's persistent and never-fully-disclosed WMD program represented a grave threat to international security. Al Gore, for example, in his much-hyped antiwar speech last September, acknowledged that "Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to completely deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power. We know he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country." The notion that the Bush administration's prewar reiteration of this view was a cynical ploy is crackpot. For that matter, the notion that the Bush administration really, really, in its heart of hearts, had other, preferred reasons for taking out Saddam Hussein-- particularly, that it did so to justify removing its troops from Saudi Arabia-- and that the entire war was therefore a fraud . . . well, this idea, too, is crackpot. What gives with this Vanity Fair interview, then? What gives is that Tanenhaus has mischaracterized Wolfowitz's remarks, that Vanity Fair's publicists have mischaracterized Tanenhaus's mischaracterization, and that Bush administration critics are now indulging in an orgy of righteous indignation that is dishonest in triplicate. CONTINUED 1 2 Next > Print This Article Odpowiedz Link Zgłoś
Gość: karras Re: bomby atomowe na Europe ? IP: *.dip.t-dialin.net 09.01.04, 21:09 Obled, jak sie to czyta. Czy oni juz kompletnie powariowali? Chyba tak. Przeciez to najbardziej paradoidalna parodia Trzeciej Rzeszy, tyle, ze z bronia atomowa. I oni jeszcze zarzucaja Europejczykom antysemityzm bo uwazaja ich za najwieksze zagrozenie dla pokoju swiatowego.... Korea Polnocna przy nich to kicius. Hitler tez zaczynal od planow "deportacji" Zydow. Czy historia sie powtorzy, czy ktos wczesniej uspi tego chorego psa, zanim zacznie gryzc na oslep? Odpowiedz Link Zgłoś
Gość: GULFNEWS Re: NIECH BUSH SPRAWDZI ARSENAL IZRAELA IP: *.NYCMNY83.covad.net 09.01.04, 21:10 www.gulfnews.com/Articles/Opinion.asp?ArticleID=107411 Odpowiedz Link Zgłoś
drzordrz Europa zakladnikiem panstwa zydowskiego? 09.01.04, 22:06 > We have the capability to take the world down with us. > And I can assure you that that this will happen before Israel goes under." No to z pomoca amerykanska sie doczekalismy.... Europa i my wszyscy stalismy sie zakladnikami zydowskiego panstwa. Holocaust im sie marzy.... Co czeka nasze dzieci? Odpowiedz Link Zgłoś
Gość: U Re: bomby atomowe na Europe ? IP: *.75.50.76.Dial1.Boston1.Level3.net 09.01.04, 22:31 Terminologia jak:-zyd,profesor,madrosc,Izrael, od jakiegos czasu niema nic wspolnego Wybranymi,Humanizmem.Sami widzicie,do czego moze doprowaszic koncentracja chorych mozgow,zdeformowanych psychhicznie jednostek nie majacych nic wspolnego z reszta swiata. Pewnej nocy Szatan puscil baka...... Odpowiedz Link Zgłoś
Gość: ABE Re: bomby atomowe na Europe ? IP: *.dialup.xtra.co.nz 09.01.04, 22:57 No z takim oswiadczeniem ONZ powinno Inspectorow wyslac do Iraela, a jak sie nie zgodza to Drugi Iraq. Tyle tylko ze Senat w USA caly zydowski, wiec nigdy budzetu na te wyprawe "krzyzacka" nie zaaprobuja. Co na temat Senatu UE? Odpowiedz Link Zgłoś
Gość: Anka Zydzi powariowali juz kompletnie IP: *.dip.t-dialin.net 10.01.04, 15:24 Mozesz podac link do tego artykulu? Nie chcialabym, zeby nasze dzieci albo wnuki, jesli przezyja, nazywaly Adolfa Hitlera jako wielkiego ale niedocenionego wizjonera i ratownika ludzkosci. Z tego, co tam pisze, wynika, ze kiedys moze do tego dojsc. Odpowiedz Link Zgłoś