Dodaj do ulubionych

bomby atomowe na Europe ?

IP: *.NYCMNY83.covad.net 09.01.04, 16:22

Israeli Professor - 'We Could
Destroy All European Capitals'
By Nadim Ladki
2-6-3

(IAP News)
Obserwuj wątek
    • Gość: Konrad? Re: bomby atomowe na Europe ? IP: *.telia.com 09.01.04, 17:04
      To prawda?
      To trzeba na nich bombe , wystarczy jedna w celu prewentywnym. Sama wypowiedz
      kwalifikuje ich do zniszczenia na pyl.
    • marcus_crassus islamic co for pale.??f??w ogole for >coo???<????? 09.01.04, 17:16
      widze ze chlopaki arafata spuscili z tonu...w 1948 byli pewni wygranej,dostali
      wpiernicz,w 1967 dostali lomot w dupe,w 1973 znow sie rozochocili i skonczylo
      sie tak jak zwykle --> czyli dostali lomot...

      teraz zas Saddam gnije w US areszcie,libia sie poddala,reszta krajow zatoki
      wiernie sklada holdy "wielkiemu szatanowi" no i palestynki jak ladnie juz leza
      i piszcza "kwiiiik,bija nas,łojojojojoj,ale nas piora" :)))))))


      ciezko chlopakom z hamasow sie wiedzie,a to na swieta dostana prezencik od
      zydow w postaci rakietki w samochodzik,a to swietujac nowy rok zydki strzelili
      pare rac i ustrzelili paru bandziorkow....

      a teraz bandziorki biegaja i rycza ze strachu ze ich zydki bija...a bylo nie
      zaczynac...i znow dostali lomot... :)))))))

      *******************************************************************************

      a izrael wyrasta na mocarstwo swiatowe --> Ruscy przez bron atomowa awansowali
      do grona poteg swiatowych mimo ze za grzyba do nich nie pasuja...Izrael ze
      swoim arsenalem i technologia bedzie niedlugo potega swiatowa...

      a wy gromadko lewackich smrodkow mozecie sie najwyzej w tylek cmoknac :DDDD
      • Gość: WEEKLYSTANDARD Re: islamic co for pale.??f??w ogole for >coo? IP: *.NYCMNY83.covad.net 09.01.04, 21:08






        Login email: Password: Remember me
        Register | Forgot password? | Change Password | Update Email

        What Wolfowitz Really Said
        From the June 9, 2003 issue: The truth behind the Vanity Fair "scoop."
        by William Kristol
        06/09/2003, Volume 008, Issue 38
        Increase Font Size
        Printer-Friendly



        Email a Friend
        Respond to this article



        www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/002/757wzfan.asp


        AS THIS MAGAZINE goes to press, a controversy swirls about the head of Deputy
        Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz. He is alleged to have "revealed," in an
        interview with writer Sam Tanenhaus for the Manhattan celebrity/fashion glossy
        Vanity Fair, that the Bush administration's asserted casus belli for war
        against Saddam Hussein--the dictator's weapons-of-mass-destruction program--was
        little more than a propaganda device, a piece of self-conscious and insincere
        political manipulation.

        Lazy reporters have been following the lead of the press release Vanity Fair
        publicists circulated about their "scoop." It begins as follows:

        Contradicting the Bush administration, Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul
        Wolfowitz tells Vanity Fair that weapons of mass destruction had never been the
        most compelling justification for invading Iraq.

        As it happens, this is a not-quite-accurate description of a paragraph in
        Tanenhaus's article, which itself bears reprinting for reasons that will become
        obvious in a moment:

        When we spoke in May, as U.S. inspectors were failing to find weapons of mass
        destruction, Wolfowitz admitted that from the outset, contrary to so many
        claims from the White House, Iraq's supposed cache of WMD had never been the
        most important casus belli. It was simply one of several reasons: "For
        bureaucratic reasons we settled on one issue, weapons of mass destruction,
        because it was the one reason everyone could agree on." Everyone meaning,
        presumably, Powell and the Joint Chiefs of Staff. "Almost unnoticed but huge,"
        he said, is another reason: removing Saddam will allow the U.S. to take its
        troops out of Saudi Arabia, where their presence has
        been one of al-Qaeda's biggest grievances.

        Let's be clear: Though Paul Wolfowitz has friends and admirers at The Weekly
        Standard, we would be surprised and more than a little distressed had he
        actually said what he's supposed to have said in this instance.

        For the last 12 years, all specific and sometimes heated policy disagreements
        notwithstanding, American presidents of both parties, joining a near-unanimous
        consensus of the so-called "world community," have agreed that the Baath party
        regime's persistent and never-fully-disclosed WMD program represented a grave
        threat to international security. Al Gore, for example, in his much-hyped
        antiwar speech last September, acknowledged that "Iraq's search for weapons of
        mass destruction has proven impossible to completely deter and we should assume
        that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power. We know he has stored
        secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country." The
        notion that the Bush administration's prewar reiteration of this view was a
        cynical ploy is crackpot.

        For that matter, the notion that the Bush administration really, really, in its
        heart of hearts, had other, preferred reasons for taking out Saddam Hussein--
        particularly, that it did so to justify removing its troops from Saudi Arabia--
        and that the entire war was therefore a fraud . . . well, this idea, too, is
        crackpot.

        What gives with this Vanity Fair interview, then?

        What gives is that Tanenhaus has mischaracterized Wolfowitz's remarks, that
        Vanity Fair's publicists have mischaracterized Tanenhaus's mischaracterization,
        and that Bush administration critics are now indulging in an orgy of righteous
        indignation that is dishonest in triplicate.



        CONTINUED
        1 2 Next >
        Print This Article













    • Gość: karras Re: bomby atomowe na Europe ? IP: *.dip.t-dialin.net 09.01.04, 21:09
      Obled, jak sie to czyta. Czy oni juz kompletnie powariowali? Chyba tak.
      Przeciez to najbardziej paradoidalna parodia Trzeciej Rzeszy, tyle, ze z bronia
      atomowa.
      I oni jeszcze zarzucaja Europejczykom antysemityzm bo uwazaja ich za najwieksze
      zagrozenie dla pokoju swiatowego.... Korea Polnocna przy nich to kicius.

      Hitler tez zaczynal od planow "deportacji" Zydow.

      Czy historia sie powtorzy, czy ktos wczesniej uspi tego chorego psa, zanim
      zacznie gryzc na oslep?
      • Gość: GULFNEWS Re: NIECH BUSH SPRAWDZI ARSENAL IZRAELA IP: *.NYCMNY83.covad.net 09.01.04, 21:10
        www.gulfnews.com/Articles/Opinion.asp?ArticleID=107411
    • drzordrz Europa zakladnikiem panstwa zydowskiego? 09.01.04, 22:06
      > We have the capability to take the world down with us.
      > And I can assure you that that this will happen before Israel goes under."

      No to z pomoca amerykanska sie doczekalismy....
      Europa i my wszyscy stalismy sie zakladnikami zydowskiego panstwa.
      Holocaust im sie marzy....

      Co czeka nasze dzieci?
    • Gość: U Re: bomby atomowe na Europe ? IP: *.75.50.76.Dial1.Boston1.Level3.net 09.01.04, 22:31
      Terminologia jak:-zyd,profesor,madrosc,Izrael, od jakiegos czasu niema nic
      wspolnego Wybranymi,Humanizmem.Sami widzicie,do czego moze doprowaszic
      koncentracja chorych mozgow,zdeformowanych psychhicznie jednostek nie majacych
      nic wspolnego z reszta swiata.

      Pewnej nocy Szatan puscil baka......
    • Gość: ABE Re: bomby atomowe na Europe ? IP: *.dialup.xtra.co.nz 09.01.04, 22:57
      No z takim oswiadczeniem ONZ powinno Inspectorow wyslac do Iraela, a jak sie
      nie zgodza to Drugi Iraq.
      Tyle tylko ze Senat w USA caly zydowski, wiec nigdy budzetu na te
      wyprawe "krzyzacka" nie zaaprobuja.
      Co na temat Senatu UE?
    • Gość: Anka Zydzi powariowali juz kompletnie IP: *.dip.t-dialin.net 10.01.04, 15:24
      Mozesz podac link do tego artykulu?

      Nie chcialabym, zeby nasze dzieci albo wnuki, jesli przezyja, nazywaly Adolfa
      Hitlera jako wielkiego ale niedocenionego wizjonera i ratownika ludzkosci.
      Z tego, co tam pisze, wynika, ze kiedys moze do tego dojsc.
Inne wątki na temat:

Nie masz jeszcze konta? Zarejestruj się


Nakarm Pajacyka