Dodaj do ulubionych

Bush wasz zdrajca

30.08.04, 15:28
Bush najpierw przeprosil sie z ONZ uznajac, ze jednak potrzebna mu rezolucja
i wsparcie powazniejszych niz te nowoeuropejskie, lakome padliny przydupasy.
Przeprosil sie z Europa. Przyznal, ze to jednak CO2 winny jest zmian
klimatycznych, o czym mowa we wzgardzonych przez niego miedzynarodowych
protokolach. Okreslil "zwyciestwo" nad Irakiem jako katastrofe, zauwazajac
skutki w postaci rozszalalego terroru, przed czym go ostrzegano. Teraz
przyznal, ze wojny z terroryzmem nie mozna wygrac, co mowili mu przeciwnicy
wojny z Irakiem.

Towarzysze czerwoni. Wasz wielki brat was osral. Popatrze teraz z uwaga, jak
bedziecie opluwac Busha za lewackie poglady.
Obserwuj wątek
    • wqrwiony2 Ale on im już zaprogramował kierunki plucia... 30.08.04, 15:33
      a chłopcy mają kłopoty z samodzielnym myśleniem - jak ich idol...
    • Gość: Amerykanin Naiwni jestescie jak stado skunksow. Kto wierzy, IP: *.detroit-19rh15rt.mi.dial-access.att.net 30.08.04, 16:00
      Bushowi, ze nie mozna wygrac wojny z terroryzmem, powinien przejsc na Islam,
      czy o to Ci chodzi? Bush jest politykiem i wykorzystuje kazda okazje, zeby
      zobaczyc skad wiatr wieje. Ameryka to nie Bush albo Kerry albo inny polityk.
      Ameryka to 300 milionow ludzi z najpotezniejsza armia w swiecie. Politykow tu
      sie wymienia czesto ale polityka USA jest ciagle taka sama: " Utrzymac
      pierszenstwo w swiecie". Kto to zmieni?
      • Gość: Tysprowda Re: Naiwni jestescie jak stado skunksow. Kto wier IP: 193.188.161.* 01.09.04, 10:11
        Ameryka to nie Opus Dei, panta rei.

        Naiwni jestescie buszolomy jak stado skunksow.....

        Busha Nostra wam Ameryke zmieni i polozy ja na lopatki.

        Powiekszy panantyamerykanizm.

        Ale jak tego chcecie, to trudno.
      • indris I w tym cała nadzieja... 01.09.04, 11:52
        ...że jak pisze Amerykanin "Ameryka to 300 milionow ludzi", a nie idiota (lub
        oszust) Bush. To prawda, ze USA maja najpotężniejsza armię na świecie. Ale
        najpotężniejsza to nie znaczy WSZECHMOCNA. Na myleniu tych pojęć "przewiózł"
        się już niejeden polityk.
        90 lat temu najpotężniejszą armię na świecie miały cesarskie Niemcy. Zaczęły
        wojnę, z wiadomym skutkiem.
        Podobnie tragiczne konsekwencje dla Ameryki i świata moloby mieć mylenie
        pojęć "pierwszeństwo w świecie" i WŁADZA nad światem. To pierwsze Ameryka już
        ma. Tej drugiej nie będzie mieć nigdy.
        Mam nadzieję, że większość z 300 milionów Amerykanów to rozumie lub zrozumie.
        To właśnie jeden z największych Amerykanów, Lincoln, powiedział, że można
        oszukać jednego na długo, wielu na krótko, ale nie można oszukać wielu na
        długo. W irackiej awanturze Amerykanie dali sie oszukać Bushowi, jak 65 lat
        temu Niemcy Hitlerowi. Ale jak mówił Lincoln...
        • Gość: Tysprowda Re: I w tym cała nadzieja...UE to jest to! IP: 193.188.161.* 01.09.04, 13:59
          O--O to jest to!

          Os Okcydent--Orient to jest to!

          Euro od morza do morza, od Atlantyku do Pacyfiku, bez granic, z 250 milionami
          Slowian.
          ******************************************************************************

          Daring to dream

          Europe is no utopia but, using Britain as a bridge, it can share its global
          vision with the US

          Jeremy Rifkin
          Wednesday September 1, 2004
          The Guardian

          In a deeply polarised America, where virtually every value has become fair game
          for criticism, there is one that remains sacrosanct: the American dream - the
          idea that anyone, regardless of the circumstances to which they're born, can
          make of their lives as they choose, by dint of diligence, determination, and
          hard work. The problem is that one-third of all Americans, according to a
          recent national survey, no longer even believe in it. Some have lost faith
          because they worked hard all their lives only to find hardship and despair.
          Others question the very dream itself, arguing that its underlying tenets have
          become less relevant in an increasingly interconnected and interdependent
          world. For the first time, the American dream no longer serves as the rallying
          point for everyone in America.
          Meanwhile, a new European dream is beginning to capture the world's
          imagination. That dream has now been codified in the form of a draft
          constitution and Europeans are currently debating whether or not to ratify its
          contents and accept its underlying values as the core of a new Europe.

          Twenty-five nations, representing 455 million people, have joined together to
          create a "United States" of Europe. Like the United States of America, this
          vast political entity has its own empowering myth. Although still in its
          adolescence, the European dream is the first transnational vision, one far
          better suited to the next stage in the human journey. Europeans are beginning
          to adopt a new global consciousness that extends beyond, and below, the borders
          of their nation-states, deeply embedding them in an increasingly interconnected
          world.

          Advertiser links
          Voluntary Work Overseas
          See the world from a whole new perspective with...

          crossculturalsolutions.org

          Become an Oxfam Volunteer
          From trade to aid, debt to democracy, help Oxfam work to...

          oxfam.org.uk

          Ambulance Service Careers
          Two Shires Ambulance Services NHS Trust - voluntary work in...

          twoshiresjobs.org
          Americans are used to thinking of their country as the most successful on
          earth. That's no longer the case: the EU has grown to become the third largest
          governing institution in the world. Though its land mass is half the size of
          the continental US, its $10.5 trillion GDP now eclipses the US GDP, making it
          the world's largest economy. The EU is already the world's leading exporter and
          largest internal trading market. The comparisons are even more revealing when
          it comes to the quality of life. For example, in the EU, there are
          approximately 322 physicians per 100,000 people; in the US there are only 279
          physicians per 100,000 people. The US ranks 26th among the industrial nations
          in infant mortality, well below the EU average. The average life-span in the 15
          most developed EU countries is now 78.2 years compared to 76.9 years in the US.
          When it comes to wealth distribution - a crucial measure of a country's ability
          to deliver on the promise of prosperity - the US ranks 24th among the
          industrial nations. All 18 of the most developed European countries have less
          income inequality between rich and poor.

          Europeans often remark that Americans "live to work", while they "work to
          live". The average paid vacation time in Europe is now six weeks a year. By
          contrast, Americans, on average, receive only two weeks. When one considers
          what makes a people great and what constitutes a better way of life, Europe is
          beginning to surpass America.

          Nowhere is the contrast between the European dream and the American dream
          sharper than when it comes to the definition of personal freedom. For
          Americans, freedom has long been associated with autonomy; the more wealth one
          amasses, the more independent one is in the world. One is free by becoming self-
          reliant and an island unto oneself. With wealth comes exclusivity and with
          exclusivity comes security. For Europeans, freedom is not found in autonomy but
          in community. It's about belonging, not belongings.

          Americans are more willing to employ military force to protect perceived vital
          self-interests. Europeans favour diplomacy, economic aid and peacekeeping
          operations to maintain order. The American dream is deeply personal and little
          concerned with the rest of humanity. The European dream is more systemic, bound
          to the welfare of the planet.

          That isn't to say that Europe is a utopia. Europeans have become increasingly
          hostile towards asylum seekers. Anti-semitism is on the rise, as is
          discrimination against Muslims and other religious minorities. While Europeans
          berate America for having a trigger-happy foreign policy, they are willing, on
          occasion, to let the US armed forces safeguard European security interests. And
          even its supporters say that the EU's governing machinery, based in Brussels,
          is aloof from the citizens it supposedly serves.

          The point, however, is not whether the Europeans are living up to their dream.
          We Americans have never fully lived up to our own dream. What's important is
          that a new generation of Europeans is creating a radical new vision for the
          future.

          The UK is uniquely positioned to play a bridge role between the older American
          dream and the newly emerging European dream. Were it to cast its fate with the
          EU, while maintaining its special relationship with America, the UK could help
          create an ideological synergy between the two great superpowers of the 21st
          century. The UK could champion the entrepreneurial sensibilities and sense of
          individualism that is so characteristic of the US way of life, within the
          corridors of Europe. At the same time, the UK could help Americans better
          understand the need to expand their dream beyond individual self-interests to
          include the general welfare of the larger community and a global consciousness
          more befitting a globalising world.

          But the UK will never fully enjoy the advantages that come with being part of a
          shared political space if it continues to straddle the fence. The US and the EU
          are going to increasingly realise that their own prosperity and security
          depends on their cooperation, if for no other reason than the fact that they
          each represent the two largest markets in the world. What can the UK offer
          either of these megapowers that they can't better secure by dealing directly
          with each other?

          Instead of seeing full membership in the European Union in purely negative
          terms, as something being forced on them by the flow of global events, the UK
          ought to consider Europeanisation as a historic opportunity, with vast
          potential benefits for the British people. By being a critical part of a larger
          European agenda, the UK can play a leadership role in helping shape the
          European dream and laying the groundwork for a truly global consciousness in
          the coming century. Equally importantly, the UK's ability to draw America and
          Europe closer together depends on it being squarely in the EU fold.

          The human race is becoming connected. Nation-state boundaries, once a source of
          security in an unpredictable world, are increasingly seen as too restrictive to
          accommodate the many new identities, affiliations and loyalties that make up a
          network way of life. The question for the British people, and peoples
          everywhere, is whether to be constrained inside old political containers, or to
          reach out and establish new political arrangements more suitable to an era of
          ever greater interdependence.

          The real lesson in a glo
    • schlagbaum Re: Bush wasz zdrajca 01.09.04, 11:36
      korespondent.wojenny napisał:

      > Bush najpierw przeprosil sie z ONZ uznajac, ze jednak potrzebna mu rezolucja
      > i wsparcie powazniejszych niz te nowoeuropejskie, lakome padliny przydupasy.
      > Przeprosil sie z Europa. Przyznal, ze to jednak CO2 winny jest zmian
      > klimatycznych, o czym mowa we wzgardzonych przez niego miedzynarodowych
      > protokolach. Okreslil "zwyciestwo" nad Irakiem jako katastrofe, zauwazajac
      > skutki w postaci rozszalalego terroru, przed czym go ostrzegano. Teraz
      > przyznal, ze wojny z terroryzmem nie mozna wygrac, co mowili mu przeciwnicy
      > wojny z Irakiem.
      >
      > Towarzysze czerwoni. Wasz wielki brat was osral. Popatrze teraz z uwaga, jak
      > bedziecie opluwac Busha za lewackie poglady.

      Gdyby nie chodzilo o busha, mozna by sadzic, ze facet zaczyna myslec.

Nie masz jeszcze konta? Zarejestruj się


Nakarm Pajacyka