Niewplnictwo murznow

[Gość: JV]

Jews and the
Black Holocaust
What are the Issues?


Blacks and Jews have been involved in a re-evaluation of their current and
historical relationship. Events of the past several months have raised both
tensions and the level of rhetoric coming from all sides. The Secret
Relationship Between Blacks and Jews is a historical accounting of the part of
the relationship that has been ignored by both Blacks and Jews. Most people are
not even aware of the extensive record of encounters between the two groups
prior to the 20th century. The Honorable Louis Farrakhan referred to this well-
documented history in 1984 and was immediately labeled an "anti-Semite." Merely
questioning the belief that Jews were co-sufferers in the Black slave
experience draws angry rebukes from Jews of all stripes. The book in question
presents indisputable historical data from census records, wills, Jewish
historians and scholars, rabbinical sermons, port records, court records,
runaway slave notices, slave sale advertisements, etc., which forces all sides
to grapple with the long-held mythology that Black people always found a friend
in the Jews.

Some Jews and their dutiful negros have hired the services of Dr. Harold
Brackman of the Simon Wiesenthal Center in an effort to preserve the
comfortable mythology which has obscured the actual historical record. But
unbeknownst to them, Dr. Brackman's 1977 unpublished Ph.D. dissertation,
entitled The Ebb and Flow of Conflict, goes far beyond The Secret Relationship
in its claims of Jewish conspiracy in the Biblical origin of White supremacy.
He clearly states that Jewish Talmudic scholars invented the Hamitic Myth
which, through the story of Noah, everlastingly assigned to the African the
role of slave and divinely cursed servant of White people. According to Dr.
Tony Martin's book, The Jewish Onslaught, the Jewish invention of the Hamitic
Myth "provided the moral pretext upon which the entire trade grew and
flourished."

"There is no denying," said Brackman of the story of Noah, "that the Babylonian
Talmud was the first source to read a Negrophobic content into the episode..."
Brackman pointed out further that two third century Jewish "Sages" provided
homosexual embellishments for the Biblical story as well.

This "curse" was the absolute basis for the Europeans' choice of dark-skinned
Africans for chattel slavery. Many denominations of Christianity, Islam and
Judaism believe it and teach it to this very moment! Southern plantation owners
attacked the Abolitionists with it; its teaching was the foundation of the
slaves' permitted religion; Black inferiority is based on it; the Ku Klux Klan
relies on it; even the Mormons officially taught it until 1978. When the Jews
invented it and promoted it to the world they sentenced the Black Race to a
holocaust the likes of which no people have ever suffered. "Hate teaching" will
forever be defined by this wicked belief system brought to us in the Jewish
Holy Talmud via Harold Brackman.

The critics curiously use a Harvard English teacher, Henry Louis Gates, to
offer historical clarity. Gates exhibits no evidence that he even read the book
in his oft-quoted NY Times opinion. His willingness to make asinine historical
claims with the glaring absence of support from reputable Black or Jewish
historians proves Adam Clayton Powell's axiom: "Harvard has ruined more negroes
than bad whiskey."


Overwhelming Evidence
The history that the old "Black-Jewish Coalition" clumsily avoids is the entire
three century history of Jewish presence in South America and the Caribbean.
But other highly acclaimed Jewish scholars have not been so blind:

·Lee M. Friedman, a one-time president of the American Jewish Historical
Society, wrote that in Brazil, where most of the Africans actually went, "the
bulk of the slave trade was in the hands of Jewish settlers."
·Marcus Arkin wrote that the Jews of Surinam used "many thousands" of Black
slaves.
·Herbert I. Bloom wrote that "the slave trade was one of the most important
Jewish activities here (in Surinam) as elsewhere in the colonies." He even
published a 1707 list of Jewish buyers by name with the number of Black humans
they purchased.
·Cecil Roth, writer of 30 books and hundreds of articles on Jewish history,
wrote that the slave revolts in parts of South America "were largely directed
against [Jews] as being the greatest slave-holders of the region."
·"I gather," wrote Jewish scholar Wilfred Samuels, "that the Jews [of Barbados]
made a good deal of their money by purchasing and hiring out negroes..."
·According to the Jewish historians, all Barbadian Jews owned slaves - even the
rabbi had "the enjoyment of his own two negro attendants."
·In Curaçao which was a major slave trading depot, Isaac and Susan Emmanuel
report that "the shipping business was mainly a Jewish enterprise."
·Says yet another Jewish writer of the Jews of Curaçao, "Almost every Jew
bought from one to nine slaves for his personal use or for eventual resale."
·Seymour B. Liebman in his New World Jewry, made it clear that "[t]he ships
were not only owned by Jews, but were manned by Jewish crews and sailed under
the command of Jewish captains."
·Moshe Kahan stated bluntly that in 1653-1658, " Jewish-Marrano merchants were
in control of the Spanish and Portuguese trade, were almost in control of the
Levantine trade...were interested in the Dutch East and West Indian companies,
were heavily involved in shipping; and, most important, had at their disposal
large amounts of capital."
·In Brazil, where most of our kidnapped ancestors were sent, Jewish scholar
Arnold Wiznitzer is most explicit about Jewish involvement:

"Besides their important position in the sugar industry and in tax farming,
they dominated the slave trade. From 1636 to 1645 a total of 23,163 Negro
slaves arrived from Africa and were sold for 6,714,423 florins. The West India
Company, which monopolized imports of slaves from Africa, sold slaves at public
auctions against cash payment. It happened that cash was mostly in the hands of
Jews. The buyers who appeared at the auctions were almost always Jews, and
because of this lack of competitors they could buy slaves at low prices. On the
other hand, there also was no competition in the selling of the slaves to the
plantation owners and other buyers, and most of them purchased on credit
payable at the next harvest in sugar. Profits up to 300 percent of the purchase
value were often realized with high interest rates....If it happened that the
date of such an auction fell on a Jewish holiday the auction had to be
postponed. This occurred on Friday, October 21, 1644."

Given the concise statements in the Jewish historical record, of which
the "Black/Jewish Coalition" is totally ignorant, how can it be taken seriously
in the present debate? (For even more evidence see the Facts and Quotes Section.


Jews and Slavery in the Old South
The Jewish critics prefer to focus on the history of slavery in America while
ignoring the kidnapped African family in other parts of the Western Hemisphere.
This attempt to focus the debate is designed to limit the historical inquiry
and to suggest that Blacks are to care only about their Black family within
America's political boundaries. This view also conveniently limits the
consideration of evidence of direct Jewish involvement as whip-wielders in the
slave trade which is so abundant in the southern part of the Western
Hemisphere. By the time of the Jewish migration into what is now the United
States, Jews were less involved in the direct trade but remained significant
beneficiaries by their involvement in the plantation economy.

Jews in the South were of the merchant