Syria oskarża Izrael o zabicie Al Hariri

[czarny.rycerz]

www.informationclearinghouse.info/article8075.htm


Na zdrowy rozum widać, że Syria nie ma żadnego interesu w tym zabojstwie.To oczywista prowokacja izraelsko-jankeska.

Jeszcze jeden dowód na spisek USA / Israel

[czarny.rycerz]

Rzekoma al Kaida (czyli operacja wywiadów USA, brytanii i Israela) przyszła znowu z pomocą swoim mocodawcom.
Wydała oświadczenie, że to nie islamska organizacja, która sie przyznała, spowodowała zamach. Nie . To nawey nie sama al kaida. Al Kaida twierdzi, że to rząd syryjski. :)

www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=worldNews&storyID=7630327

'Qaeda' Says Jihadists Didn't Kill Hariri

DUBAI (Reuters) - A statement attributed to al Qaeda and posted on the Internet on Tuesday denied Islamists had killed former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafik al-Hariri, saying Lebanese, Syrian or Israeli intelligence were behind the attack.

The statement, signed by a hitherto unknown group calling itself the Al Qaeda Organization in the Levant, was posted on an Islamist Web site often used by al Qaeda a day after another unknown Islamist group said it was behind the huge Beirut blast that killed Hariri.

-------------

A dlaczego rządy za tym musiały stać?

[czarny.rycerz]

USA twierdzi, że zamach był tak wyrafinowany, ze musiał stać za tym jakis rząd (i pewnie stał).
Jeżeli podstawienie samochodu z bombą jest tak wyrainowane, że musiał za tym stać wywiad panstwowy, to czy atak na WTC mogł spowodować spisek Osamy kierowany z jaskini w Afganistanie?

[misterpee]

wlasnie , jak znalezc pretekst zeby uderzyc na Syrie.

poznać rycerza po zakutym łbie:)

[szyszkaaa]

[misterpee]

ta sama grupa knuje nowe wojny, nowe ataki , nowy terror. Neocon dzialaja. Chor
jastrzebi.

Calls to Attack Syria Come from a Familiar Choir of Hawks
By Jim Lobe
Foreign Policy In Focus
April 16, 2003

Many of the same people who led the campaign for war against Iraq signed a
report released three years ago that called for using military force to disarm
Syria of weapons of mass destruction (WMD) and to end its military presence in
Lebanon.

Among the signers are several senior members of the administration of President
George W. Bush, including the chief Middle East aide on the National Security
Council, Elliott Abrams; Undersecretary of Defense for Policy Douglas Feith;
Undersecretary of State for Global Affairs Paula Dobriansky; and senior
consultants to both the State Department and the Pentagon on Iraq policy,
Michael Rubin and David Wurmser. Also signing were Richard Perle, the powerful
former chairman of the Defense Policy Board (DPB); Jeanne Kirkpatrick, former
United Nations ambassador; Frank Gaffney, a former Perle aide who heads the
Center for Defense Policy; Michael Ledeen, another close Perle collaborator at
the American Enterprise Institute (AEI); and David Steinmann, chairman of the
Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs (JINSA).

The study, Ending Syria's Occupation of Lebanon: The U.S. Role, was co-authored
by Daniel Pipes, who has just been nominated by Bush to a post at the U.S.
Institute of Peace (USIP), and Ziad Abdelnour, who heads a group founded by him
called the United States Committee for a Free Lebanon (USCFL). The study was
released by Pipes' group, the Middle East Forum.

The USCFL, whose 67 "Golden Circle" members include virtually all of the 31
signatories of the report, has been a major force behind the Syria
Accountability and Lebanese Sovereignty Restoration Act that was just
reintroduced in the House of Representatives last Friday by Reps. Eliot Engel,
a USCFL member, and Ileana Ros Lehtinen. The legislation, which had 150
cosponsors in the House last year, would impose far-reaching economic and
diplomatic sanctions against Syria until the president certified that it has
stopped all support to Lebanon's Hezbollah militia and other groups that
Washington considers "terrorist," the government withdraws its estimated 20,000
troops from Lebanon, and takes other measures long demanded by Washington.

Getting Serious about Syria

"Now that Saddam Hussein's regime (in Iraq) is defeated," Engel said April
11, "it is time for America to get serious about Syria. The United States must
not tolerate (its) continued support of the most deadly terrorist organizations
in the world, its development of weapons of mass destruction, and its
occupation of Lebanon." He said a companion measure, cosponsored by Democratic
Sen. Barbara Boxer and Republican Sen. Rick Santorum will soon be introduced in
the Senate. The action comes amid a two-week-old flurry of threats by top
administration officials against Syria over its alleged failure to cooperate
with Washington's military campaign against Baghdad.

Those threats culminated Sunday when Bush himself accused Syria of having
chemical weapons, although he did not specify whether they were home-grown or
received from Iraq for safe-keeping, as alleged by Israeli Prime Minister Ariel
Sharon earlier this year and repeated by senior Pentagon officials. Last week,
Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld accused Syria of harboring members of
Hussein's regime, and, asked whether Damascus was "next" after Iraq, replied
that "it depends on people's behavior." Intelligence officials told reporters
last week that Rumsfeld had ordered the drawing up of contingency plans for a
possible invasion of Syria and that Feith, the Pentagon's number three
official, had begun work on a policy paper about Syria's support of terrorist
groups.

"There's got to be a change in Syria," said Deputy Secretary of State Paul
Wolfowitz last Sunday on a TV network news program. "It is a strange regime,
one of extreme ruthlessness." At the same time, former Central Intelligence
Agency (CIA) director James Woolsey, a favorite of Wolfowitz and Perle who may
be tapped to play a top political role in post-war Iraq, declared that
Washington was fighting enemies in a "World War IV" that includes "fascists of
Iraq and Syria," a reference to Syria's ruling Baath Party.

These statements have contributed to the growing impression that administration
hawks do indeed consider Syria next on the list, although some have also made
clear that if President Bashar Assad--who CIA sources have said has generally
cooperated with U.S. efforts against the al Qaeda terrorist group of Osama bin
Laden--meets a number of demands, possibly including turning over Iraqi
officials who may have entered Syria, he is unlikely to face the full force of
U.S. military power, at least for now.

Still, there is no question that the hawks, boosted by the easier-than-expected
victory in Baghdad, are eager to throw their weight around, particularly in
Syria's direction. This is especially true of the neoconservatives closest to
the right-wing Likud Party in Israel who, 19 years after U.S. Marines completed
a humiliating withdrawal from Beirut in the wake of a series of deadly bombings
committed by Syria-backed Hezbollah, appear to be itching to get revenge.

Indeed, it was Assad's father Hafez who single-handedly frustrated U.S. efforts
to convert the 1982 Israeli invasion of Lebanon into a major strategic advance
in the region. At the time, Abrams, Perle, Kirkpatrick, Gaffney, and Ledeen
were all serving in the Ronald Reagan administration. Syria intervened in
Lebanon's civil war in 1975 and has kept tens of thousands of troops there
since, although they have become less conspicuous over the past decade. Except
for the 18 months that followed Israel's 1982 invasion (which was led by
Sharon), Damascus' influence has been decisive in Beirut's foreign and defense
policy.

The 2000 study by Pipes' Middle East Forum stressed that "Syrian rule in
Lebanon stands in direct opposition to American ideals," and it rued
Washington's habit since 1983 of engaging rather than confronting the regime,
the only government on the State Department's "terrorism" list with which
Washington has full diplomatic relations. The "Lebanon Study Group" urged a
policy of confrontation, beginning with tough economic and diplomatic sanctions
that could not be waived by the president and, if necessary, military
force. "The Vietnam legacy and the sour memories of dead American Marines in
Beirut notwithstanding," the group wrote, "the United States has entered a new
era of undisputed military supremacy coupled with an appreciable drop in human
losses on the battlefield." The group also warned that, "This opens the door to
a similar decision to act for Lebanon's endangered freedoms and pluralism. But
this opportunity may not wait, for as weapons-of-mass-destruction capabilities
spread, the risks of such action will rapidly grow," in an argument eerily
similar to those the hawks deployed prior to the Iraq invasion. "If there is to
be decisive action, it will have to be sooner rather than later."

The USCFL, which lists Amin Gemayel--who as Lebanon's president signed an
aborted peace treaty with Israel in 1983--as the top figure in the Lebanese
opposition on its website, appears to enjoy strong backing from both the
Christian Right and far-right Jewish neoconservatives, such as Perle, Ledeen,
Steinmann, Pipes, and Gaffney. While a handful of the Lebanese-Americans listed
in its "Golden Circle" are Muslim, most, including Abdelnour, an investment
banker, are Christian. A plurality of "Golden Circle" members appears to be
Jewish-Americans.

[misterpee]

.

A ‘Greater Israel’ In The Making: Experts


Palestinians are still suffering under U.S.-backed Israeli occupation


By Kazi Mahmood, Southeast Asia correspondent

KUALA LUMPUR, April 16 (IslamOnline.net) - A greater Israel is in the making
with the fall of the Saddam regime in Baghdad and with the taming of Syria,
Iran and other Arab nations in the Middle Eastern region, said political
analysts in the South East Asian region on Wednesday, April 16.

The United Kingdom and the U.S. alongside with their allies are assisting
Israel in this ‘machiavelic’ plan that includes the partitioning of Saudi
Arabia, Lebanon, Iraq and Syria, said analysts in Indonesia and Malaysia.

“Libya is also a target in what is now to be called the ‘Middle Eastern Axis of
evil’ in a bid to secure both oil and strategic regions for the strengthening
of the U.S. Empire and the making of a greater Israel in the Middle East,”
Abdullai Rauf, a political analyst told IslamOnline.net on Wednesday.

“The warnings to Syria, Iran and Libya are part of the plan and is the strategy
that will now be adopted by the anti-Arab nation (Israel) in a bid to create a
larger, greater Israel that will extend beyond its current borders,” said
Abdullai.

He was joined in his fears with comments from another professor from Indonesia;
Dr Gatut Priyowidodo Msi, who told Antara news agency that he feared Ariel
Sharon, the Israeli premier was setting the stage for a “greater Israel” after
the fall of Baghdad.

In Padang, where professor Priyowidodo is attached to the Internasional
Universitas Ekasakti (UNES) and who is a political analyst there, added that
Sharon is waiting for the “highway” to be opened to realize his dreams.

The invasion of Iraq opened the doors for a greater Israel and any attacks on
Syria or a taming of the Syrian regime will add to the theory of a greater
Israel, Priyowidodo added.

The professor said on Tuesday, April 14, that the warnings given to Syria by
the U.S. were strong enough to indicate that the Middle Eastern nation was the
next target in a “cleansing” of the region.

Syria has been accused of producing chemical weapons, of hiding Iraq’s weapons
of mass destruction - which should include nuclear war heads - said Professor
Abdullai, and of harboring former members of the defunct regime in Baghdad.

The U.S. has warned Syria that it should not support the Hizbullah resistance
group in Lebanon in its fight against Israel and that the country should also
not assist any other “terrorist groups” against the Zionist state.

Britain has also warned Syria that it was high time to join the “international”
community and to abandon support for terrorism and to prevent a war against
Damascus.

The U.S. and British interest in Syria after the rapid fall of Baghdad has
spurred surprise and disdain in South East Asia, with several high officials of
Malaysia and Indonesia expressing their fears of another war for regime change
in the Middle East.

According to Professor Priyowidodo, the U.S. is also setting the stage for
a “security tampon” for Israel, a country which U.S. supports militarily and
economically.

He added that it would not be surprising that the U.S. attacks other Arab
states in order to secure Israel, which in turn will become the bigger and most
powerful nation in the Middle East itself.

Israel is already considered the mini-super power of the region with its
arsenal of nuclear weapons and other weapons of mass destruction, said other
experts in Asia.

“A change in regime in Syria, a greater Israel, will have a huge impact on the
entire world and the South East Asian region with Malaysia, Indonesia, Brunei
and other Muslim nations here will not be safe anymore,” said Abdullai.

Israel once occupied some territories from its wars with the Arabs in 1967 and
1974. It controlled part of the Sinai in Egypt, the Golan Heights in Syria, the
Gaza strip and the West Bank. Today, the Golan Heights is still in its hands
and it has imposed its occupation on the West Bank following the Palestinian
Intifada against the Israeli occupation.

In 1982, it invaded southern Lebanon but was pushed out thanks to the struggle
by the Hizbollah, aided by the Syrian army.

The architect of the invasion of Lebanon by Israel is Ariel Sharon, then
minister of defense of Israel who committed crimes in Sabra and Shatila with
the massacre of thousands of Palestinian civilians.

According to Priyowidodo, Sharon has killed the peace process in Palestine and
is now aiming at a greater Israel but with the explicit assistance of the U.S.
and British forces in the region.

He believes the ‘greater Israel’ will see the day since the U.S. is now being
lobbied by pro-Jewish influence in Washington that has led to the Iraq war and
is now turning towards Syria and other Muslim nations in the Middle East.

“To realize the dream of a greater Israel, Sharon will lobby that the U.S. and
British forces be used to invade Syria and Iran,” he added.

These two nations, he added, were the cornerstones in the dream of Sharon.

PRAWIDLOWO, ze Syria oskarza IZRAEL!!! :-)))))))))

[meerkat1]

Przeciez to uciekajacy przed policja zlodziej zawsze najglosniej krzyczy:

"LAPAC ZLODZIEJA!!!" :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

A co to bylo Al Hariria? Tancerka brzucha?

[kropekuk]

[misterpee]

NAJGORSZE JEST TO ZE BUSZARON NIE WACHAJA SIE URZC PIERWSI BRONI ATOMOWEJ, I
CORAZ SWIAT ZACZYNA MYSLEC O ODWECIE PRZY POMOCY TEJ SAMEJ BRONI. ROWNIEZ
DAZENIE DO TEJ NAJGORSZEJ WOJNY W HISTORI SWIATA STALE POSTEPUJA. BUSZARON NIE
MJA ZUPELNIE HAMULCOW. jEST TO TAK JAK PRZED II WOJNA SWIATOWA

Do zamachu użyto bomby mikronuklearnej

[czarny.rycerz]

Takiej, jakiej oficjalnie chce Rumsfeld (to tylko gra psychologiczna, bo takie bomby juz mają, ale chcą wystraszyć innych).


www.vialls.com/beirut/micronuke.html

[kyle_broflovski]

xymphora.blogspot.com/

[fredzio54]

na glowie zlodzieje pali cie czpaka !
Assad tawil an waibil znaczy wysoki i glupi

[misterpee]

U.S. may use a proxy to attack Iran
The former Malaysian Prime Minister Dr. Mahathir Mohamed says that the United
States might use Israel as a proxy to launch an attack against Iran targeting
its nuclear facilities, the official Bernama news agency reported.
Posted Feb 18, 2005 08:48 AM PST
Category: IRAN


No! You think?

[misiabella4]

następny mirmilek

[oscar62]

WIADOMO, ZE IZRAEL ZBURZYL WIEZOWCE WTC W NOWYM JORKU, SPOWODOWAL TSUNAMI NA
DALEKIM WSCHODZIE I TERAZ ZLIKWIDOWAL BYLEGO PREMIERA LIBANU I JEGO SWITY. TAKI
MALY I TAKI NIEBEZPIECZNY DLA CALEGO SWIATA...