Dodaj do ulubionych

A little quiz for erwas and chickenshorts

IP: *.nyc.rr.com 07.02.04, 05:30
Who said that? You'll never guess.

"Good evening.
Earlier today, I ordered America's armed forces to strike military and
security targets in Iraq. They are joined by British forces. Their mission is
to attack Iraq's nuclear, chemical and biological weapons programs and its
military capacity to threaten its neighbors.

Their purpose is to protect the national interest of the United States, and
indeed the interests of people throughout the Middle East and around the world.

Saddam Hussein must not be allowed to threaten his neighbors or the world with
nuclear arms, poison gas or biological weapons."

Obserwuj wątek
    • Gość: erwas and the answer is... IP: *.sulphurcanyon.com 07.02.04, 19:07

      ...that one reason why no WMD are to be found in Iraq today was that Bill
      Clinton destroyed most of their production facilities in HIS little pre-emptive
      strike back then.

      The big difference between Slick Willie and W is that Slick Willie was slick
      and W is mired in arrested pubescence. their aims and morality were little
      different, but while SW got away with everything W has earned the scorn of most
      of humanity.
      just as an aside: Clinton was a poor boy from the "back woods" of Arkansas.
      Bush, the fake cowboy from Midland/Odessa TX is a silver-spoon baby from New
      England, related to (I have heard said and seen written) more European royal
      families than Queen Elizabeth II.
      • Gość: wacko jacko Re: and the answer is... IP: *.nyc.rr.com 07.02.04, 22:06
        Jesus Christ, it's a simple question. Either you know the answer or you don't.

        PS. Clinton also bombed a chemical weapons factory in Sudan which happenned to be
        a aspirin factory.

        Do you talk the way you write? So pubescent.
        • Gość: erwas Re: and the answer is... IP: *.sulphurcanyon.com 08.02.04, 02:50
          > Do you talk the way you write? So pubescent.
          how can you be so cruel wacko jacko!

          I mentioned moral certitude and the officially sanctioned brave new world of
          black and white clarity: "you're either for us or against us". correct me if
          I'm wrong felusiak, but your question carried a certain implication, which I
          read to be that there is not much to choose between a Democratic President
          Clinton and Republican President Bush. that, wacko jacko, falls into the area
          known as nuance (shades of meaning), which has been banned since 9/11, but
          since we're online in a Polish kind of setting we might just get away with it.

Nie masz jeszcze konta? Zarejestruj się


Nakarm Pajacyka