Gość: wacko jacko IP: *.nyc.rr.com 08.07.04, 00:13 It was a long wait. www.usatoday.com/money/industries/energy/2004-07-07-enron-lay-indicted_x.htm?POE=NEWISVA Odpowiedz Link Zgłoś Obserwuj wątek Podgląd Opublikuj
cynik5 A window dressing to help Bush... 08.07.04, 00:21 Gość portalu: wacko jacko napisał(a): > It was a long wait. > www.usatoday.com/money/industries/energy/2004-07-07-enron-lay-indicted_x.htm?POE=NEWISVA .. in his reelection. Just to show the American simpletons how tough he (Bush) is even to his buddies. Odpowiedz Link Zgłoś
Gość: wacko jacko Re: A window dressing to help Bush... IP: *.nyc.rr.com 08.07.04, 01:36 According to conpiracy therorists Bush is currently holding Osama bin Laden in an undisclosed location only to anounce his capture right before the elections to dress that window. Odpowiedz Link Zgłoś
chickenshorts Re: A window dressing to help Bush... 08.07.04, 08:19 Wacko, have you ever considered changing your nick? maybe, just as cynik5 aptly named you, simpleton…? Or borrow his, with no1! …<conpiracy therorists> … Eh? Freudian or Jungian slip? Maybe ‘constipacy terrorists’…? Or ‘conman’s theories’… Odpowiedz Link Zgłoś
cynik5 Re: A window dressing to help Bush... 08.07.04, 11:14 chickenshorts napisał: > Wacko, have you ever considered changing your nick? > maybe, just as cynik5 aptly named you, simpleton…? Or borrow his, with no > 1! > > …<conpiracy therorists> … Eh? Freudian or Jungian slip? > Maybe ‘constipacy terrorists’…? Or ‘conman’s theo > ries’… Chicken Please do not be too hard on jacko! He is just attempting to emulate his idol who can not talk, (and obviously spell). Perhaps he simply meant "conspiracy theorists", the term so beloved by Cro Magnons, Rush Limbaughs etc ?(the world will never know). Odpowiedz Link Zgłoś
Gość: wacko jacko You morons......... IP: *.nyc.rr.com 08.07.04, 23:06 it was a fucking typo. How are you doing in a sand pit? One word for you to memorize: malcontent- a discontented person: a : one who bears a grudge from a sense of grievance or thwarted ambition b : one who is in active opposition to an established order or government : REBEL Rebels you are not. PS. So tell me chickenshorts are you happy now? As I remember you were very upset that Lay wasn't indicted. How do you feel now? Share it with me. Odpowiedz Link Zgłoś
cynik5 Re: You morons......... 09.07.04, 04:39 Gość portalu: wacko jacko napisał(a): > it was a fucking typo. How are you doing in a sand pit? > One word for you to memorize: > malcontent- a discontented person: > a : one who bears a grudge from a sense of grievance or thwarted ambition > b : one who is in active opposition to an established order or government : REB > EL > > Rebels you are not. > > PS. So tell me chickenshorts are you happy now? As I remember you were very > upset that Lay wasn't indicted. How do you feel now? Share it with me. F...typo? You might get away with it if one word is misspeled. But to butcher two consecutive words"conpiracy therorists" and use this excuse one has be a total asshole which you are in spades. Odpowiedz Link Zgłoś
Gość: wacko jacko Re: You morons......... IP: *.nyc.rr.com 09.07.04, 09:33 Go fcuk yorself Odpowiedz Link Zgłoś
Gość: wacko jacko scenik6 fcuk ofg IP: *.nyc.rr.com 09.07.04, 19:10 cynik5 napisała: > But to butcher two consecutive words"conpiracy therorists" and use this excuse > one has be a total asshole which you are in spades. I respectfully disagree with your asessment. I find it to be biased and baseless. I might be a careless fuck or a word butchering dick but by all means not an asshole. Odpowiedz Link Zgłoś
cynik5 Re: scenik6 fcuk ofg 09.07.04, 20:42 Gość portalu: wacko jacko napisał(a): > cynik5 napisała: > > But to butcher two consecutive words"conpiracy therorists" and use this ex > cuse > > one has be a total asshole which you are in spades. > > I respectfully disagree with your asessment. I find it to be biased and baseles > s. > I might be a careless fuck or a word butchering dick but by all means not an > asshole. So refreshingly disarming, you know I am beginning to think that there is some hope for you. Odpowiedz Link Zgłoś
Gość: wacko jacko Re: chickenshorts you should be happy now IP: *.nyc.rr.com 08.07.04, 23:08 Have you seen F911? How much do they charge? Odpowiedz Link Zgłoś
cynik5 Re: chickenshorts you should be happy now 09.07.04, 04:40 one picture is worth a thousand words story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&u=/040708/photos_ts_afp/040708125254_jg418y7h_photo1 Odpowiedz Link Zgłoś
Gość: wacko jacko Re: chickenshorts you should be happy now IP: *.nyc.rr.com 09.07.04, 09:39 cynik5 napisała: > one picture is worth a thousand words Not this one. Without the text undeneath, it's worth nothing. There is more to a kenny boy story thnak yuu Odpowiedz Link Zgłoś
chickenshorts Re: chickenshorts you should be happy now 09.07.04, 13:48 Hi, wacko... >... So tell me chickenshorts are you happy now? As I remember you were very > upset that Lay wasn't indicted. How do you feel now? Share it with me. C'mon! One cannot help wondering and I certainly tend to agree with cynik... given the timing and their record on veracity. It also shows that Bush is running scared. Kenny boy probably thinks he is helping his matey by 'making himself available for questioning', reckoning that reelection of his pal is a fact but he may find himself out of luck when Bush leaves the White House... > Not this one. Without the text undeneath, it's worth nothing. The text undeneath depicts circumstances and is much less than a thousand words. > There is more to a kenny boy story No doubt & you sure know best. And no, I haven't seen Farenheit yet. (But don't spoil it for me, please.) ... burning Bush in effigy isn't enough for me, I tell ya. Odpowiedz Link Zgłoś
Gość: wacko jacko sometimes IP: *.nyc.rr.com 09.07.04, 19:05 Sometimes it is useful to know a little and not to rely on emotions. Do you know that Kenny Boy fell out of favor with Bush a long time ago when he backed Ann Richards for a governor? You didn't. The indictment is way more than making yourself available for questioning. Odpowiedz Link Zgłoś
chickenshorts Re: sometimes 10.07.04, 10:24 Gość portalu: wacko jacko napisał(a): > Sometimes it is useful to know a little< Bingo! Do you know that humans are basically emotional creatures and the so called reason and rationality are just devices for defence, justification or strengthening of the emotions on which they 'function'? Mostly! >and not to rely on emotions.< How edifying! But I rather rely on my 'feeling' of what's right and wrong than on spurious arguments from Ramsfeld's briefs. How come, then, that with all that detailed information, greater knowledge and ability to think independently... of 'bandwagon'... you are constantly on the wrong side of the fence. I mean, all your so called arguments of your supposedly own briliance are nothing but regurgitated Rumsfeld/Cheney avaricious 'ideology'... > Do you know that Kenny Boy fell out of favor with Bush a long time ago when he > backed Ann Richards for a governor? You didn't. So what? What does that tell you? That if he didn't make that mistake he wouldn't even be indicted?... But that's the point! The Bush's idea of democracy is incongruous with principles of democracy and traduces the very notion of justice and principles of law. Was that emotional? > The indictment is way more than making yourself available for questioning. I know... but thank you. PS. Stop being an asshole! Odpowiedz Link Zgłoś