Dodaj do ulubionych

chickenshorts you should be happy now

IP: *.nyc.rr.com 08.07.04, 00:13
It was a long wait.
www.usatoday.com/money/industries/energy/2004-07-07-enron-lay-indicted_x.htm?POE=NEWISVA
Obserwuj wątek
    • cynik5 A window dressing to help Bush... 08.07.04, 00:21
      Gość portalu: wacko jacko napisał(a):

      > It was a long wait.
      > www.usatoday.com/money/industries/energy/2004-07-07-enron-lay-indicted_x.htm?POE=NEWISVA


      .. in his reelection.
      Just to show the American simpletons how tough he (Bush) is even to his buddies.
      • Gość: wacko jacko Re: A window dressing to help Bush... IP: *.nyc.rr.com 08.07.04, 01:36
        According to conpiracy therorists Bush is currently holding Osama bin Laden in
        an undisclosed location only to anounce his capture right before the elections
        to dress that window.
        • chickenshorts Re: A window dressing to help Bush... 08.07.04, 08:19
          Wacko, have you ever considered changing your nick?
          maybe, just as cynik5 aptly named you, simpleton…? Or borrow his, with no1!

          …<conpiracy therorists> … Eh? Freudian or Jungian slip?
          Maybe ‘constipacy terrorists’…? Or ‘conman’s theories’…
          • cynik5 Re: A window dressing to help Bush... 08.07.04, 11:14
            chickenshorts napisał:

            > Wacko, have you ever considered changing your nick?
            > maybe, just as cynik5 aptly named you, simpleton…? Or borrow his, with no
            > 1!
            >
            > …<conpiracy therorists> … Eh? Freudian or Jungian slip?
            > Maybe ‘constipacy terrorists’…? Or ‘conman’s theo
            > ries’…

            Chicken
            Please do not be too hard on jacko!
            He is just attempting to emulate his idol who can not talk, (and obviously
            spell).
            Perhaps he simply meant "conspiracy theorists", the term so beloved by Cro
            Magnons, Rush Limbaughs etc ?(the world will never know).
            • Gość: wacko jacko You morons......... IP: *.nyc.rr.com 08.07.04, 23:06
              it was a fucking typo. How are you doing in a sand pit?
              One word for you to memorize:
              malcontent- a discontented person:
              a : one who bears a grudge from a sense of grievance or thwarted ambition
              b : one who is in active opposition to an established order or government : REBEL

              Rebels you are not.

              PS. So tell me chickenshorts are you happy now? As I remember you were very
              upset that Lay wasn't indicted. How do you feel now? Share it with me.
              • cynik5 Re: You morons......... 09.07.04, 04:39
                Gość portalu: wacko jacko napisał(a):

                > it was a fucking typo. How are you doing in a sand pit?
                > One word for you to memorize:
                > malcontent- a discontented person:
                > a : one who bears a grudge from a sense of grievance or thwarted ambition
                > b : one who is in active opposition to an established order or government :
                REB
                > EL
                >
                > Rebels you are not.
                >
                > PS. So tell me chickenshorts are you happy now? As I remember you were very
                > upset that Lay wasn't indicted. How do you feel now? Share it with me.


                F...typo?
                You might get away with it if one word is misspeled. But to butcher two
                consecutive words"conpiracy therorists" and use this excuse one has be a total
                asshole which you are in spades.


                • Gość: wacko jacko Re: You morons......... IP: *.nyc.rr.com 09.07.04, 09:33
                  Go fcuk yorself
                • Gość: wacko jacko scenik6 fcuk ofg IP: *.nyc.rr.com 09.07.04, 19:10
                  cynik5 napisała:
                  > But to butcher two consecutive words"conpiracy therorists" and use this excuse
                  > one has be a total asshole which you are in spades.

                  I respectfully disagree with your asessment. I find it to be biased and baseless.
                  I might be a careless fuck or a word butchering dick but by all means not an
                  asshole.
                  • cynik5 Re: scenik6 fcuk ofg 09.07.04, 20:42
                    Gość portalu: wacko jacko napisał(a):

                    > cynik5 napisała:
                    > > But to butcher two consecutive words"conpiracy therorists" and use this ex
                    > cuse
                    > > one has be a total asshole which you are in spades.
                    >
                    > I respectfully disagree with your asessment. I find it to be biased and
                    baseles
                    > s.
                    > I might be a careless fuck or a word butchering dick but by all means not an
                    > asshole.

                    So refreshingly disarming, you know I am beginning to think that there is some
                    hope for you.
    • Gość: wacko jacko Re: chickenshorts you should be happy now IP: *.nyc.rr.com 08.07.04, 23:08
      Have you seen F911? How much do they charge?
      • cynik5 Re: chickenshorts you should be happy now 09.07.04, 04:40
        one picture is worth a thousand words
        story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&u=/040708/photos_ts_afp/040708125254_jg418y7h_photo1
        • Gość: wacko jacko Re: chickenshorts you should be happy now IP: *.nyc.rr.com 09.07.04, 09:39
          cynik5 napisała:

          > one picture is worth a thousand words

          Not this one. Without the text undeneath, it's worth nothing.

          There is more to a kenny boy story

          thnak yuu
          • chickenshorts Re: chickenshorts you should be happy now 09.07.04, 13:48
            Hi, wacko...

            >... So tell me chickenshorts are you happy now? As I remember you were very
            > upset that Lay wasn't indicted. How do you feel now? Share it with me.

            C'mon! One cannot help wondering and I certainly tend to agree with cynik...
            given the timing and their record on veracity. It also shows that Bush is
            running scared.
            Kenny boy probably thinks he is helping his matey by 'making himself available
            for questioning', reckoning that reelection of his pal is a fact but he may
            find himself out of luck when Bush leaves the White House...


            > Not this one. Without the text undeneath, it's worth nothing.

            The text undeneath depicts circumstances and is much less than a thousand
            words.

            > There is more to a kenny boy story

            No doubt & you sure know best.

            And no, I haven't seen Farenheit yet.
            (But don't spoil it for me, please.) ... burning Bush in effigy isn't enough
            for me, I tell ya.


            • Gość: wacko jacko sometimes IP: *.nyc.rr.com 09.07.04, 19:05
              Sometimes it is useful to know a little and not to rely on emotions.
              Do you know that Kenny Boy fell out of favor with Bush a long time ago when he
              backed Ann Richards for a governor? You didn't.
              The indictment is way more than making yourself available for questioning.
              • chickenshorts Re: sometimes 10.07.04, 10:24
                Gość portalu: wacko jacko napisał(a):

                > Sometimes it is useful to know a little<

                Bingo! Do you know that humans are basically emotional creatures and the so
                called reason and rationality are just devices for defence, justification or
                strengthening of the emotions on which they 'function'? Mostly!

                >and not to rely on emotions.<

                How edifying! But I rather rely on my 'feeling' of what's right and wrong than
                on spurious arguments from Ramsfeld's briefs.

                How come, then, that with all that detailed information, greater knowledge and
                ability to think independently... of 'bandwagon'... you are constantly on the
                wrong side of the fence. I mean, all your so called arguments of your
                supposedly own briliance are nothing but regurgitated Rumsfeld/Cheney
                avaricious 'ideology'...

                > Do you know that Kenny Boy fell out of favor with Bush a long time ago when he
                > backed Ann Richards for a governor? You didn't.

                So what? What does that tell you? That if he didn't make that mistake he
                wouldn't even be indicted?... But that's the point! The Bush's idea of
                democracy is incongruous with principles of democracy and traduces the very
                notion of justice and principles of law.

                Was that emotional?

                > The indictment is way more than making yourself available for questioning.

                I know... but thank you.

                PS. Stop being an asshole!

Nie masz jeszcze konta? Zarejestruj się


Nakarm Pajacyka