al.1
04.03.05, 11:55
Motto: It’s high time to demyth science.
It seems to me that my conclusions regarding the Universe I’ve managed to
describe clearly enough, entering into the area administered mainly by
licensed science. I am also aware that I can lay myself open to criticism of
some representatives of the scientific conservatives - with all due respect
for their knowledge. But let’s go to the point. Well, I took the liberty to
carry out an investigation on my own in which the threads of the universe and
time are combined. I’d like to limit myself to the most important - in my
opinion - implications, which brings my definition of time. The stimulus,
which pushed me into defining of time, is a centenary of pyramidal nonsense
in which is believed considerable part of a scientific world. The point is of
course in so called “relativity of time” (and space too) and in particular,
so called “dilation of time”. I’ve realized that all the disputes on that
topic are futile as long, as the definition of time won’t be delivered, and
what I hereby do:
1. “Time is motion of anything in relation to anything” also “Time is motion
of any form of matter in relation to any form of matter”. It can be counted
according to the admitted model of measurement. If it is relating to the
beginning of the universe, it can be named “common”. If to individual forms
of matter, it can be named “individual”.
Is it clear enough? If not, please try to elongate motion.
2. Timelessness – probably took place in primordial space filled with energy -
about which, later on below.
3. There was no singularity at all. Unless it appeared from a magician’s hat.
Even absurdities have their limits. Just space is the mother of the universe.
In order something might exist, first there must be space.
4. It was its condensed energy which must have initiated the simplest
particles and in farther sequence, the simplest element, i.e. hydrogen.
5. The big bang therefore occurred (however many bangs cannot be excluded)
after concentration of the gigantic hydrogen cloud, the mass of which was
approximately equal to that of today’s universe (matter is accompanied by
motion), explosion of which caused separation of electromagnetic radiation
and scattering of matter according to centrifugal force, in the form of
spiral with arms, and with its empty interior in a such way, that particles
of bigger mass found themselves closer to the centre of explosion, and those
of smaller one - farther. Conclusion: the universe spins.
6. No matter whichever variant is true, it seems to be plenty of “universes”
similar to ours (the Universe is obviously only one). The observed
accelerations of galaxies testify that huge masses, beyond possibility of our
penetration, are generators of their accelerations.The most probable scenario
is concentration of all universes’ matter
7. Distortion of space - yes, but not of spacetime. Space contains its energy
(diminished by value converted into matter).
8. So called “spacetime” it’s a consecutive artificial idea, serving to
stupefy researchers. Space cannot be coupled with time. Space’s attribute is
energy. In turn, time is matter’s attribute, as it is in a constant motion.
Time therefore is married with matter, and space with energy.
9. The Universe is therefore finite and limited. It’s expansion over itself
is impossible.
I am not able to list all the implications appearing from my definition of
time, as it would take me at least couple of months.
To sum up:
Scientists, no matter what authority represent, should be severely criticised
for propagation of knowledge, which denies common sense. If in turn I’ve made
in my conclusions any mistakes, then I should be harshly judged, including
possible hurling insults, for which I will certainly not be offended, as I’ve
got such a privilege over scientists, that I am an independent researcher-
intuitioner, who has also something to say on this matter. And my final
message: Apart from proper mathematical calculations and adherence to the
laws of physics, common sense must be applied too - in terms of cosmology of
course - as it’s impossible to perform a model of the Universe. It’ll never
be possible to carry out such an experience.
Andrzej Lechowski
