The New Yorker: USA chcą wojny z Iranem

A to?:

[zuckerman]

5 Opowiadajcie w Judzie,
ogłoście w Jerozolimie!
Dmijcie w trąby w kraju,
wołajcie głośno i mówcie:
"Zbierajmy się i udajmy do miast warownych!"
6 Wznieście znak w kierunku Syjonu!
Uciekajcie! Nie zatrzymujcie się!
Sprowadzę bowiem nieszczęście z północy
i wielkie zniszczenie.
7 Lew wyruszył ze swego legowiska
i niszczyciel narodów jest w drodze.
Opuścił swoją siedzibę,
by zamienić twój kraj w pustynię.
Miasta twoje zostaną zburzone
i pozbawione mieszkańców.
Wezwanie do pokuty i zapowiedź klęski
8 Dlatego przywdziejcie szaty pokutne,
podnieście lament i zawodzenie,
bo nie odwrócił się od nas wielki gniew Pański.
9 W owych dniach - wyrocznia Pana -
zabraknie królowi odwagi,
zabraknie i dostojnikom,
kapłanów ogarnie osłupienie,
a prorocy oniemieją.
10 I powiedzą: "Ach, Panie Boże,
naprawdę zwiodłeś zupełnie ten lud i Jerozolimę,
gdy mówiłeś: Będziecie mieli pokój.
Tymczasem mamy miecz na gardle".
11 W owym czasie będzie się mówić do ludu tego i do Jerozolimy:
Palący wiatr wyżynny przychodzi z pustyni
na drogę Córy mojego ludu;
nie po to jednak, by przesiewać czy oczyszczać.
12 Przyjdzie silny wiatr na mój rozkaz.
Teraz Ja także ogłoszę wyrok na nich.
13 Oto nadciąga on niby obłoki,
a jak huragan rydwany jego,
szybsze niż orły jego konie".
Biada nam, bo jesteśmy zgubieni.
www.nonpossumus.pl/ps/Jr/4.php

a wiec wojna

[wasylzly]

no coz, trzeba zadac sobie pytanie, ktor powstrzyma amerke, ktora robi sie nieobliczalna. Juz wiemy ze coputerowe, precyzyjne wojny nie funkcjonuja, ze polega ona na trzchorzowyskim rownaiu z powietrza wszystko co wystaje ponad ziemie, wszytsko co sie porusza i zyje. Tym razem rozwaza sie tez urzycie bronii atomowej, ktora od 1945 roku byla dla cywilizowanych krajow tematem tabu. usa zagraza panstwu, ktore od 1980roku nie utrzymuje z nimi stosunkow dyplomatycznych, jest oddalone o tysiace kilometrow, nigdy i w zaden spodob nie zagraza bezpeiczenstwu usa, czy innego kraju zachodniego. Rowniez zagrozenie dla Izraela, jest mitem, te panstwa nigdy nie prowadzily wojny, ani Iran nie zamierza napasc na Izrael. A wiec mamy tu z typowym nazistowskim szantazem i napadem, na kolejny kraj, przez klike bandytow z waszyngtonu.

Jezeli usa uzyja bronii jadrowej w Iranie, calyswiat powinien zerwac z nimi stosunki dyplomatyczne. Porownywanie busza do hitlera, jest obraza dla tego ostatniego, to co robi usa, zagraza nie tylko im samym ale i calemu swiatu.

Mamy ostatnie dni pokoju swiatowego, moze i ostanie swieta, ostatnia wiosne na ziemii, wszystko za sprawa szalencow z ameryki. Kto ich powstrzyma. Cala nadzieja w Rosji i Chinach, ze swojim autorytetem neuklearnym, zagroza atakiem na USA, jezeli siegna po atom w Iranie.

[you-know-who]

oczywiscie zgadzam sie z twoim mniemaniem o bandytach z waszyngtonu, ale
zobaczysz z perspektywy ze to byla tylko psy-op.

koncerta nie bud'et.

beda tylko grane do znudzenia rozne trailers, duzo piany z pyska polecie wielu
panom i paniom.

[porque]

wasylzly napisał:

> Jezeli usa uzyja bronii jadrowej w Iranie, calyswiat powinien zerwac z nimi sto
> sunki dyplomatyczne. Porownywanie busza do hitlera, jest obraza dla tego ostatn
> iego, to co robi usa, zagraza nie tylko im samym ale i calemu swiatu.

Mysle, ze masz juz gotowy plan pomnika ku chwale wielkiemu wodzu III Rzeszy. A
co powinien zrobic caly swiat, kiedy atomowki uzyje np.Francja, ostatnio jasno
przedstawili swoj plan. Moze ten piesek (you know who:) merdajacy ogonkiem na
twoje posty cos ci podpowie.

Does Israel Conduct Covert Action in America?

[nehdat]

You bet it does
by Michael Scheuer
Covert action is much talked about and little understood. At its most basic
level, covert action is a set of intelligence operations undertaken by a
specific state's intelligence agencies to advance its national interests. They
are executed in a manner that limits the visibility of that state's hand in
whatever is done. Ideally, covert actions cannot be traced back to their
sponsor. Most people take the term covert action to mean violent actions of one
kind or another: kidnapping, assassination, support for insurgents, etc. While
violence can certainly be part of a covert-action campaign, the more insidious –
and often more effective – arm of covert action is called "political action,"
whereby one state seeks to influence the public opinion of another by speaking
through the mouths of that country's citizens. And let me stress, there is
nothing wrong or immoral about covert political action. America used political
action worldwide in the Cold War; Britain used it in the United States to
accelerate neutral America's entry into both world wars; the Saudis pay untold
amounts to retired senior U.S. officials to speak admiringly of the anti-
American desert tyranny; and Israel uses it today against America to ensure
unlimited and unquestioning U.S. support. It is a legitimate foreign affairs
tool, and the leaders of any nation who choose not to engage in such activity
are certifiably negligent fools.

For years – even decades – U.S. citizens have been the subject of a political
action campaign designed and executed by Israel. Currently, Israel's campaign
is part steady-as-she-goes and part improvisation to neutralize an unexpected
and – for Israel – worrying development. So far, Israel's covert political
action is succeeding hands down. Americans are gradually being indoctrinated to
believe Islamists are today's Nazis and that there is no "Israeli lobby" in
America. Simply put, Israel is conducting a brilliant covert political action
campaign in the United States, a campaign any intelligence service in the world
would rightly be proud of.

Part one of Israeli's political action consists simply of using that old
standby debate-suppressor, the four-letter word "Nazi." Newspapers in Israel,
of course, have long used the word to describe Israel's Muslim enemies.
Recently, for example, the Jerusalem Post ran an article in which al-Qaeda is
described as "yet another Nazi knockoff." This sort of language is the stuff of
Israeli journalism, and not of much concern to Americans. If the Israeli press
wants to teach their readers to underestimate the Islamist threat, so be it.

But now the word "Nazi" is being gradually fed to Americans as a scientific
definition of our Islamist enemies. Headlines such as "Hamas Uber
Alles," "Hitler's Heirs in Damascus," and "The Nazi Correction to Islamic
Terror" are increasingly common in U.S. media publications found in the news
files Googled daily by Americans. U.S. politicians, too, are eager to jump on
the call-them-Nazis bandwagon, with Secretary Rumsfeld recently saying that
leaving Iraq early would be like returning postwar Germany to the Nazis, and
Sen. George Allen (R-Va.) comparing the attack on the Shia shrine in Samarra to
the burning of the Reichstag by the Nazis.

The goal of using the Nazi analogy is to suppress any realistic debate about
the pluses and minuses of the U.S.-Israel relationship, and to make sure any
American raising questions about U.S. support for Israel is seen as siding with
the "Islamofascists," the heirs of Nazism. Any person who knows the least bit
about Islam – and the Israelis know a great deal – knows it is not Nazism, yet
the Internet is rife with such titles as "A Manifesto Against Islamofascism"
and "Islamofascism's Creeping Coup in Turkey." The best capsule description of
the threat posed by Islamofascists is provided by Frank Gaffney in a recent
issue of The Intelligencer, the journal of the Association of Former
Intelligence Officers. Listen to Mr. Gaffney, and you will almost hear Muslim
jackboots striking the pavement.

"We are engaged in nothing less than a War for the Free World. This is a fight
to the death with Islamofascists, Muslim extremists driven by a totalitarian
political ideology that, like Nazism and Communism before it, is determined to
destroy freedom and the people who love it."

The drive to make Islamofascist the term of choice in describing America's
Muslim enemies is meant to still U.S. debate about Israel and, indeed, to limit
questions about any aspect of U.S. foreign policy toward the Islamic world.
After all, why would anyone in their right mind care what people think, unless
they are blindly and unthinkingly opposed to Islamofascism?

The second part of any nation's covert political action plan is to be ready to
exploit or redress unexpected developments within the target society. Last
month, Professors John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt provided such an
environment when they published a lengthy study showing the strong influence
the Israeli lobby has on the crafting and application of U.S. foreign policy
toward the Islamic world. If American society had its head screwed on right,
the collective response of the citizenry would have been, "DUH!" – signifying
that the near-determinative nature of Israeli influence is so clear that no
academic analysis of that fact is necessary.

Instead, the reaction from American elites has been that of Captain Renault in
Casablanca – they are shocked, shocked, that anyone could even think that there
is such a thing as an Israeli lobby. The elites demand that Americans believe
there are no such things as Israel-suborned American-citizen spies stealing
U.S. national security secrets, pro-Israel U.S. media publications routinely
savaging any American questioning the perfect and eternal mesh of U.S. and
Israeli interests, and U.S. politicians from Pelosi to McCain to DeLay to Rice
groveling at AIPAC's annual conference, each willing to compromise U.S.
security if they can garner pro-Israel votes and pockets stuffed with cash from
pro-Israel contributions.

In the specific case of the Mearsheimer-Walt paper, prominent pro-Israel
Americans have been quick off the mark to limit the damage caused to Israel's
interests caused by the paper's candor and truthfulness. From Marvin Kalb to
David Gergen to Max Boot to Alan Dershowitz, these folks have brazenly defied
reality by insisting there is no "Israeli Lobby" and that Mearsheimer and Walt
are dead wrong, poor scholars, paranoid conspiracy peddlers, or reborn Elders
of Zion. Eliot Cohen's essay in the Washington Post epitomizes the Israel-
Firsters' goal of defaming Mearsheimer and Walt to convince the citizenry that
they are crazy and ranting anti-Semites.

The attacks on Walt and Mearsheimer are the stuff that the dreams of political
action planners are made of: The apparently spontaneous response by target-
country citizens voicing all-out support for the covert-action-sponsoring
country. Such a response deep-sixes any chance for a substantive debate on the
issue at hand, and submerges it in a blizzard of hate speech directed at the
authors from prominent Israel-Firsters, those paragons of virtue who are the
chief proponents of First-Amendment-destroying laws against hate speech.

So at day's end, one can only say: Astoundingly well done, Israel, good for
you! The impact of your covert political action activities in America are all
that you could have hoped for: Truth is negated, dissent is suppressed, and
opponents are intimidated and defamed, and all this is done by prominent U.S.
citizens. The only competitor you have is the Saudi lobby, an organization just
as damaging as you

[nehdat]

ciag dalszy

...The only competitor you have is the Saudi lobby, an organization just as
damaging as yours to genuine U.S. national interests, a reality you and we
would see if the bloodied but hopefully unbowed Mearsheimer-Walt team decides
to analyze the corrupt and corrupting Saudi lobby.

Finally, I forgot to mention at the start that covert political action
campaigns are almost always directed by one nation against another nation that
it considers an enemy or whose leaders it judges to be gullible, venal, none
too bright, unreliable, or all four. That surely gives one pause for thought,
but it truly is the way the world works.

www.antiwar.com/scheuer/?articleid=8827
www.worldtribune.com/worldtribune/06/front2453832.0965277776.html
www.truthout.org/docs_2006/040606Y.shtml
www.rense.com/general70/mape.htm

[3m05]

ciekawe

[yann17]

porque napisała:
A
> co powinien zrobic caly swiat, kiedy atomowki uzyje np.Francja, ostatnio jasno
> przedstawili swoj plan.
================================
dlaczego Francja miałaby użyć atomówki ?????
Jaki plan przedstawiła ???????

[meerkat1]

jak to?! Nie wicie, towarzyszu?

Prez. Chirac oswiadczyl wyraznie, ze w obliczu zagrozenia terrorystycznego
Francja moze uzyc broni nuklearnej w odniesieniu do panstwa, z ktorego bedzie
wywodzil sie atak.

Uczynil to juz w publicznym przemowieniu kilka miesiecy temu. :-)

Najśmieszniejsze jest to ,że wróg już jest rozsia-

[polski_murzyn]

ny po całej UE i USA w postaci imigrantów . Już mieliśmy przykład ich siły we
Francji ,czy w USA . Czas zamknąć granice ,którzy nie potrafią się dostosować
do warunków swojego chlebodawcy ,a jak już się dostali i im coś nie pasuje to
mają swój kraj . Z jednej strony popieram USA ,ale prezydenta im współczuje ,bo
straszny dureń ,a z drugiej strony wolałbym żeby rozwiązali to dialogiem .
Jednak dopóki u sterów władzy siedzą mężczyźni dopóty będą konflikty i wojny .
Czas oddać władzę kobietom . Czas neandertalczyka i podbojów terytorialnych się
skończył .

bedzie to III wojna swiatowa,

[ja.wars]

bo Chiny i Rosja sie wlacza.

do "ja.wars"

[wet3]

ja.wars napisał:

> bedzie to III wojna swiatowa, bo Chiny i Rosja sie wlacza.

Przeciez III wojne mamy juz od wkroczenia do Afganistanu oraz Iraku! Gdzie Ty
zyjesz?!

[ja.wars]

mowimy o swiatowej, ktora bedzie wowczas, gdy wlacza sie do niej inne
mocarstwa, jak Rosja i Chiny przeciw USA. W Iraku i Afganistanie zboje (buszyci
+ Blair) napadly na niewinne panstwa i czynia to bezkarnie, bo swiat siedzi
cicho. Rosja i Chiny jednak mowia, ze nie bede siedziec chico podczas ataku na
Iran, bo on bedzie preludium do ataku na te kraje. buszyci-neokoni chca zaczac
wojne z calym swiatem

Nie wlacza sie. nie maja sily

[kwakwa11]

i dlatego teraz jest czas na czyscczenie pola.

[beernut]

polski_murzyn napisała:

> ny po całej UE i USA w postaci imigrantów . Już mieliśmy przykład ich siły we
> Francji ,czy w USA . Czas zamknąć granice ,którzy nie potrafią się dostosować
> do warunków swojego chlebodawcy ,a jak już się dostali i im coś nie pasuje to
> mają swój kraj . Z jednej strony popieram USA ,ale prezydenta im
współczuje ,bo
>
> straszny dureń
Nie musisz mi wspolczuc, Bush wedlug jego poprzedniego przeciwnika w wyborach,
John "Social Secutity Lockbox"Kerry albo Al "I created internet" Gore to jest
po prostu geniusz. Podaj troche przykladow dleczego wedlug Ciebie
jest "straszny duren"
,a z drugiej strony wolałbym żeby rozwiązali to dialogiem .
> Jednak dopóki u sterów władzy siedzą mężczyźni dopóty będą konflikty i
wojny .
> Czas oddać władzę kobietom
Jesli Mrs. Clinton bedzie prezydentem to bedzie juz blisko konca swiata. God
save the country!!!!
. Czas neandertalczyka i podbojów terytorialnych się
>
> skończył .

Ani Gore,ani Kerry nie sa geniuszami, ale Bush.:-)

[yurek11111]

<>Fajne zdjecie .... :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))


www.rzeczpospolita.pl/gazeta/wydanie_060408/swiat/swiat_a_5.html

[yann17]

yurek11111 napisał:

> <>Fajne zdjecie .... :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
--------------------------
kogo mi on przypomina ????

low yield nukes -dobre do dyskusji z ayatollahami

[krzysztof3]

nawet bardzo dobre.

low yield nukes - zbawienie ludzkosci

[kyle_broflovski]

www.countercurrents.org/moret270206.htm

To nie jest polska wojna,wara Kaczkom od Iranu!

[ezpa7z9]

Niech się kaczory lub tuski-pluski albo inne lsdziaki nie ważą na powtórkę
Iraku.Polacy nie będą ginąć za imperia koncernów paliwowych.Jak by znaprawdę
chcieli muslimów i persów zgnoić to...dali by kasę na ogniwa paliwowe.Było by
mniej zapotrzebowania na ropę i muslimy i persy wróciły by na pustynię do
kopulacji z wielbładzicami.

[silesius.monachijski1]

i tu sie zgadzam

ezpa7z9 napisał:

> Niech się kaczory lub tuski-pluski albo inne lsdziaki nie ważą na powtórkę
> Iraku.Polacy nie będą ginąć za imperia koncernów paliwowych.Jak by znaprawdę
> chcieli muslimów i persów zgnoić to...dali by kasę na ogniwa paliwowe.Było by
> mniej zapotrzebowania na ropę i muslimy i persy wróciły by na pustynię do
> kopulacji z wielbładzicami.

wyluzuj chłopcze

[ivrp]

New Yorker to raczej niepoważna gazeta, a świat wirtualny to nie to samo co
real.

czy ktos z was wie co to...

[viper39]

kontrolowany przeciek do prasy aby sprawdzic i opinie publiczna i
przedewszystkim zachowanie sie np iranu oraz kto jest w tej grze jego
prawdziwym sojusznikiem?

wiem ze najlepiej napluc na USA bo jakas gazecina walnie artykulik...ehhh
chcialoby sie powiedziec cos ale szkoda tracic czas na "medrcow"

[3m05]

"According to the paper ("Washington Post"), Israeli officials who visited
Washington recently gave the Americans an urgent message regarding Iran: The
Islamic Republic was closer to developing a nuclear bomb than Washington
realizes, and the moment of decision is approaching quickly".

To jest swiat wirtualny czy real?

Syjonistyczna armada rusza do ataku w obronie GWB

[nehdat]

Syjonisci bronia G.W. Busha z entuzjazmem wartym lepszej sprawy.

Ale jak interesy Izraela w USA zagrozone to trzeba powalczyc i na forum
syjonistycznego GWna.

..."With Bush and the Republican’s poll numbers on a slow but inexorable slide
downwards, (one poll has Bush at 36% and another at 32% with similar numbers
for Republicans in general. Cheney is now at 16%!) the President is frantically
trying to shore up withering public support by “town hall” meetings. He has
been face to face with brutal reality when he gets rough questions from the
floor or gets booed. The effective but nasty DeLay has gone to his maker and
Rove is reported next to be indicted so the White House is full of people
filling out new job resumes. The True and Loyal are becoming comically not so
and the American media, other than the pathological O’Reilley and other nutties
at Fox, are engaging in a feeding frenzy, ripping pieces out of the thrashing
Bush carcass. There is a time bomb ticking away that will do little to assist
Bush in regaining political heaven and that is the treatment of the dead GIs.
It seems that the faulty electrical power at the Baghdad morgue means that many
of the corpses of the fallen are badly rotten when they get back to the states
and the DoD is now forbidding families to open the caskets. Of course they
can’t do this but that doesn’t stop them from trying. Also, the desertion rates
are skyrocketing, and former military personnel are refusing to be recalled in
huge numbers. They can harass and arrest a few but not a few thousand. Some of
these soldiers are talking at length and in public about the horrible,
deliberate atrocities they and their fellows are wreaking on Iraqi civilians
and all of this is being covered by the foreign, but not the domestic, media.
Bush could care less if the dead soldiers were put into a wood chipper and used
as fertilizer, has never gone to any military funeral and never will. The dead
were merely a means to an end and nothing more. The struggle over illegal
immigrants heats up and this time, there will probably be no general amnesty
for the millions and millions of illegals now on the state welfare rolls, in
jails across the country and taking jobs from tens of thousands of young
Americans. Bush will leave a legacy of division and hatred behind him that is
redolent of the Reconstruction in the post-Civil War period and in the end,
there will be Republicans hanging in trees and from lampposts and freeway
overpasses all over America. (In effigy of course, the real ones having fled to
Costa Rica in droves.)” ...

www.tbrnews.org/Archives/a2249.htm

A mozna bylo uzyc Saddama.

[qc]

Teraz Irak zrojnowany.
A USA marzy do powrotu do punktu wyjscia i juz szuka nastepcy Saddama!

A to bylo takie oczywiste.
Saddam trzymal religijnych fanatykow i cala reszte tej arabskiej holoty w jeden
mozliwy i praktyczny sposob, za gardlo.
Starczylo uzyc metode kija i marchewki aby zrobic z niego koalicjanta.
A teraz uzyc go do szukania "Broni Masowego Razenia" i zaprowadzenia swieckigo
pozadku w Iranie. ( Z niewielka pomoca jego amerykanskich przyjaciol).

USA chcą wojny z Iranem

[kyle_broflovski]

en.rian.ru/russia/20060403/45107320.html

To nie USA chca wojny z Irakiem

[zbalansowany]

to zydowskie lobby w Ameryce chce wpakowac USA w nowa wojne. Niech amerykanie
wyciagaja gorace kasztany z ognia dla bandy hutzpiarzy. Dopoki przecietny
Amerykanin nie zrozumie ze robia z niego idiote, dopoty ta banda bedzie nimi
rzadzic. Juz najwyzszy czas dobrac sie tej holocie do d...y
Hej, wy tam w USA - obudzcie sie !!!!



Congress - Stop The
Bush/Cheney Iran Attack!

By Ted Lang
4-9-6

The impeachment of Bush-Cheney would be a cakewalk. More than an abundance of
rock-solid evidence is in and readily available. Fitzpatrick is ready to
strike, and real lawyers such as Jonathan Turley and former House Chief
Investigative Counsel for the Clinton impeachment, Democrat David Schippers,
can be tapped for their extensive legal skills and knowledge to quickly bring
this about.

As an emergency interim measure, Congress should either rescind or put on hold
the president's unlimited war-making powers which were based upon his lies and
fraud. War predicated purely on "intelligence information" has been proven
easily manipulated by a handful of politically motivated individuals and
traitors. The American people are no longer afraid of terrorists, but by their
astonishing response to the actions of Charlie Sheen and others, are beginning
to show their fear of an out-of-control gang of warmongers representing the
real threat to the security of both US and the rest of the world.

Only the Congress can declare war ­ the folly of doing otherwise will soon be
upon US if we do not insist that they act now. E-mail your congressman or
women, as well as your two Senators, even others who you know outside your
state or district, and get them to quickly introduce emergency legislation to
revoke President Bush's war powers. At the same time, insist they convene with
colleagues to draw up articles of impeachment for both President George Bush
and Vice President Richard Cheney.

Iran is not a threat. All the same people who warned US about the non-
existent "weapons of mass destruction" in Iraq, all the same people who warned
US about Saddam's non-involvement in 9-11, the latter most emphatically
conveyed to Bush by his own CIA on September 21, 2001, only ten days after
the "terrorist" event, are warning US now about the wrong-headedness of carpet
bombing Iran with nuclear bombs and bunker busters. This is another planned
military misadventure urged and orchestrated for US by Israel and AIPAC.

Regarding my latter "anti-Semitic" remarks, I give you the brilliantly
articulated remarks of one Michael Scheuer writing on Antiwar.com in his piece
entitled, "Does Israel Conduct Covert Action in America?" Scheuer offers: "For
years ­ even decades ­ U.S. citizens have been the subject of a political action
campaign designed and executed by Israel. Currently, Israel's campaign is part
steady-as-she-goes and part improvisation to neutralize an unexpected and ­ for
Israel ­ worrying development. So far, Israel's covert political action is
succeeding hands down. Americans are gradually being indoctrinated to believe
Islamists are today's Nazis and that there is no 'Israeli lobby' in America.
Simply put, Israel is conducting a brilliant covert political action campaign
in the United States, a campaign any intelligence service in the world would
rightly
be proud of."

Scheuer continues: "The second part of any nation's covert political action
plan is to be ready to exploit or redress unexpected developments within the
target society. Last month, Professors John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt
provided such an environment when they published a lengthy study showing the
strong influence the Israeli lobby has on the crafting and application of U.S.
foreign policy toward the Islamic world. If American society had its head
screwed on right, the collective response of the citizenry would have
been, 'DUH!' ­ signifying that the near-determinative nature of Israeli
influence is so clear that no academic analysis of that fact is necessary."

Those informed and enlightened Americans who see through the Israeli tidal wave
of propaganda hung their hopes that a report exposing Israeli influence, from
no less than Harvard University's John F. Kennedy School of Government, would
open the eyes of both America and Congress. Scheuer points out: "Instead, the
reaction from American elites has been that of Captain Renault in Casablanca ­
they are shocked, shocked, that anyone could even think that there is such a
thing as an Israeli lobby. The elites demand that Americans believe there are
no such things as Israel-suborned American-citizen spies stealing U.S. national
security secrets, pro-Israel U.S. media publications routinely savaging any
American questioning the perfect and eternal mesh of U.S. and Israeli
interests, and U.S. politicians from Pelosi to McCain to DeLay to Rice
groveling at AIPAC's annual conference, each willing to compromise U.S.
security if they can garner pro-Israel votes and pockets stuffed with cash from
pro-Israel contributions."

Scheuer completes his fine piece: "Finally, I forgot to mention at the start
that covert political action campaigns are almost always directed by one nation
against another nation that it considers an enemy or whose leaders it judges to
be gullible, venal, none too bright, unreliable, or all four."

Does this describe you Congress?

© 2006 THEODORE E. LANG 4/09/06 All rights reserved

Ted Lang is a political analyst and freelance writer.