Gość: MAJOR
IP: *.ipt.aol.com
26.10.01, 21:44
By the Research Staff of National Vanguard Books
P.O. Box 330 · Hillsboro · West Virginia 24946 · USA
Who Rules America
There is no greater power in the world today than that wielded by the
manipulators of public opinion in America.
No king or pope of old, no conquering general or high priest ever disposed of a
power even remotely approaching that of the few dozen men who control America's
mass news and entertainment media.
Their power is not distant and impersonal; it reaches into every home in
America, and it works its will during nearly every waking hour. It is the power
that shapes and molds the mind of virtually every citizen, young or old, rich
or poor, simple or phisticated.
The mass media form for us our image of the world and then tell us what to
think about that image. Essentially everything we know - or think we know -
about events outside our own neighborhood or circle of acquaintances comes to
us via our daily newspaper, our weekly news magazine, our radio, or our
television.
It is not just the heavy-handed suppression of certain news stories from our
newspapers or the blatant propagandizing of history-distorting TV "docudramas"
that characterizes the opinion-manipulating techniques of the media masters.
They exercise both subtlety and thoroughness in their management of the news
and the entertainment that they present to us.
For example, the way in which the news is covered: which items are emphasized
and which are played down, the reporter's choice of words, tone of voice, and
facial expressions; the wording of headlines; the choice of illustrations - all
of these things subliminally and yet profoundly affect the way in which we
interpret what we see or hear.
On top of this, of course, the columnists and editors remove any remaining
doubt from our minds as to just what we are to think about it all. Employing
carefully developed psychological techniques, they guide our thought and
opinion so that we can be in tune with the "in" crowd, the "beautiful people,"
the "smart money."
They let us know exactly what our attitudes should be toward various types of
people and behavior by placing those people or that behavior in the context of
a TV drama or situation comedy and having the other TV characters react to them
in the Politically Correct way.
Molding American Minds
=====================
For example, a racially mixed couple will be respected, iked, and socially
sought after by other characters, as will a "take charge" Black scholar or
businessman, or a sensitive and talented homosexual, or a poor but honest and
hardworking illegal alien from Mexico.
On the other hand, a White racist - that is, any racially conscious White
person who looks askance at miscegenation or at the rapidly darkening racial
situation in America - is portrayed, at best, as a despicable bigot who is
reviled by the other characters, or, at worst, as a dangerous psychopath who is
fascinated by firearms and is a menace to all law-abiding itizens. The White
racist "gun nut," in fact, has become a familiar stereotype on TV shows.
The average American, of whose daily life TV-watching takes such an unhealthy
portion, distinguishes between these fictional situations and reality only with
difficulty, if at all.
He responds to the televised actions, statements, and attitudes of TV actors
much as he does to his own peers in real life. For all too many Americans the
real world has been replaced by the false reality of the TV environment, and it
is to this false reality that his urge to conform responds.
Thus, when a TV scriptwriter expresses approval of some ideas and actions
through the TV characters for whom he is writing, and disapproval of others, he
exerts a powerful pressure on millions of viewers toward conformity with his
own views.
And as it is with TV entertainment, so it is also with the news, whether
televised or printed. The insidious thing about this form of thought control is
that even when we realize that entertainment or news is biased, the media
masters still are able to manipulate most of us.
This is because they not only slant what they present, but they establish tacit
boundaries and ground rules for the permissible spectrum of opinion.
As an example, consider the media treatment of Middle East news. Some editors
or commentators are slavishly pro-Israel in their every utterance, while others
seem nearly neutral.
No one, however, dares suggest that the U.S. government is backing the wrong
side in the Arab-Jewish conflict and that it served Jewish interests rather
than American interests to send U.S. forces to cripple Iraq, Israel's principal
rival in the Middle East. Thus, a spectrum of permissible opinion, from pro-
Israel to nearly neutral, is established.
Another example is the media treatment of racial issues in the United States.
Some commentators seem almost dispassionate in reporting news of racial strife,
while others are emotionally partisan - with the partisanship always on the non-
White side. All of the media spokesmen without exception, however, take the
position that "multiculturalism" and racial mixing are here to stay, and that
they are good things.
Because there are differences in degree, however, most Americans fail to
realize that they are being manipulated.
Even the citizen who complains about "managed news" falls into the trap of
thinking that because he is presented with an apparent spectrum of opinion he
can escape the thought controllers' influence by believing the editor or
commentator of his choice. It's a "heads I win, tails you lose" situation.
Every point on the permissible spectrum of public opinion is acceptable to the
media masters - and no impermissible fact or viewpoint is allowed any exposure
at all, if they can prevent it.
The control of the opinion-molding media is nearly monolithic. All of the
controlled media - television, radio, newspapers, magazines, books, motion
pictures - speak with a single voice, each reinforcing the other.
Despite the appearance of variety, there is no real dissent, no alternative
source of facts or ideas accessible to the great mass of people that might
allow them to form opinions at odds with those of the media masters.
They are presented with a single view of the world - a world in which every
voice proclaims the equality of the races, the inerrant nature of the
Jewish "Holocaust" tale, the wickedness of attempting to halt the flood of non-
White aliens pouring across our borders, the danger of permitting citizens to
keep and bear arms, the moral equivalence of all sexual orientations, and the
desirability of a "pluralistic," cosmopolitan society rather than a homogeneous
one.
It is a view of the world designed by the media masters to suit their own ends -
and the pressure to conform to that view is overwhelming. People adapt their
opinions to it, vote in accord with it, and shape their lives to fit it.
And who are these all-powerful masters of the media?
As we shall see, to a very large extent they are Jews. It isn't simply a matter
of the media being controlled by "corporate interests." If that were the case,
the ethnicity of the media masters would reflect, at least approximately, the
ratio of rich Gentiles to rich Jews. The preponderance of Jews in the media is
so overwhelming, however, that we are obliged to assume that it is due to more
than mere happenstance.
Electronic News & Entertainment Media.
Continuing government deregulation of the telecommunications industry has
resulted, not in the touted increased competition, but rather in an
accelerating wave of corporate mergers and acquisitions that have produced a
handful of multi-billion-dollar media conglomerates.
The l
