you-know-who
26.09.06, 09:05
(w 1600 inkwizycja torturowala giordano bruno.)
rozsadzcie sami - ja jestem bliski pozycji autora.
www.fff.org/comment/com0609f.asp
(tytul: stany zjednoczone barbaryzmu).
to skandal, ze ma miejce deal pomiedzy kongresem a prezydentem,
przyznajacy mu de facto wolna reke (immunitet od odpowiedzialnosci za tortury).
i to 'prawo' ma byc stosowane przez usa poza ich granicami!
zeznania wymuszone torturami wolno bedzie prawnikowi podwazac tylko wtedy,
jesli bedzie umial wykazac ze nie sa
It will be up to the president to declare which interrogation methods U.S.
agents can use — almost regardless of the Geneva Conventions. It will be up to
the president to decree who will face “rough” interrogation.
The details of the torture deal vivify how our politicians no longer give a
darn about maintaining even a pretense of due process. The agreement will
permit the use of coerced confessions in military tribunals — turning the
judicial clock back to the 1600s. The Washington Post noted that the agreement
permits “defense attorneys to challenge the use of hearsay information
obtained through coercive interrogations in distant countries only if they can
prove it is unreliable.” Thus, there is a presumption of correctness to
whatever accusation is bludgeoned out of people in secret prisons around the
world.
And it will be almost impossible to disprove an accusation when a defense
lawyer is not allowed to question — or perhaps even know — who made the charge.
