Liberating America From Israel

[Gość: Liberating America]

Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002

Liberating America From Israel

by
Former Congressman Paul Findley

Nine-eleven would not have occurred if the U.S. government had refused to
help Israel humiliate and destroy Palestinian society. Few express this
conclusion publicly, but many believe it is the truth. I believe the
catastrophe could have been prevented if any U.S. president during the past
35 years had had the courage and wisdom to suspend all U.S. aid until Israel
withdrew from the Arab land seized in the 1967 Arab-Israeli war.

The U.S. lobby for Israel is powerful and intimidating, but any determined
president - even President Bush this very day - could prevail and win
overwhelming public support for the suspension of aid by laying these facts
before the American people:

Israel's present government, like its predecessors, is determined to annex
the West Bank - biblical Judea and Samaria - so Israel will become Greater
Israel. Ultra-Orthodox Jews, who maintain a powerful role in Israeli
politics, believe the Jewish Messiah will not come until Greater Israel is a
reality. Although a minority in Israel, they are committed, aggressive, and
influential. Because of deep religious conviction, they are determined to
prevent Palestinians from gaining statehood on any part of the West Bank.

In its violent assaults on Palestinians, Israel uses the pretext of
eradicating terrorism, but its forces are actually engaged advancing the
territorial expansion just cited. Under the guise of anti-terrorism, Israeli
forces treat Palestinians worse than cattle. With due process nowhere to be
found, hundreds are detained for long periods and most are tortured. Some are
assassinated. Homes, orchards, and business places are destroyed. Entire
cities are kept under intermittent curfew, some confinements lasting for
weeks. Injured or ill Palestinians needing emergency medical care are
routinely held at checkpoints for an hour or more. Many children are
undernourished. The West Bank and Gaza have become giant concentration camps.
None of this could have occurred without U.S. support. Perhaps Israeli
officials believe life will become so unbearable that most Palestinians will
eventually leave their ancestral homes.

Once beloved worldwide, the U.S. government finds itself reviled in most
countries because it provides unconditional support of Israeli violations of
the United Nations Charter, international law, and the precepts of all major
religious faiths.


How did the American people get into this fix?

Nine-eleven had its principal origin 35 years ago when Israel's U.S. lobby
began its unbroken success in stifling debate about the proper U.S. role in
the Arab-Israeli conflict and effectively concealed from public awareness the
fact that the U.S. government gives massive uncritical support to Israel.

Thanks to the suffocating influence of Israel's U.S. lobby, open discussion
of the Arab-Israeli conflict has been non-existent in our government all
these years. I have firsthand knowledge, because I was a member of the House
of Representatives Foreign Affairs Committee in June 1967 when Israeli
military forces took control of the Golan Heights, a part of Syria, as well
as the Palestinian West Bank and Gaza. I continued as a member for 16 years
and to this day maintain a close watch on Congress.

For 35 years, not a word has been expressed in that committee or in either
chamber of Congress that deserves to be called debate on Middle East policy.
No restrictive or limiting amendments on aid to Israel have been offered for
20 years, and none of the few offered in previous years received more than a
handful of votes. On Capitol Hill, criticism of Israel, even in private
conversation, is all but forbidden, treated as downright unpatriotic, if not
anti-Semitic. The continued absence of free speech was assured when those few
who spoke out-Senators Adlai Stevenson and Charles Percy, and Reps.
Paul "Pete" McCloskey, Cynthia McKinney, Earl Hilliard, and myself-were
defeated at the polls by candidates heavily financed by pro-Israel forces.

As a result, legislation dealing with the Middle East has been heavily biased
in favor of Israel and against Palestinians and other Arabs year after year.
Home constituencies, misled by news coverage equally lop-sided in Israel's
favor, remain largely unaware that Congress behaves as if it were a
subcommittee of the Israeli parliament.

However, the bias is widely noted beyond America, where most news media
candidly cover Israel's conquest and generally excoriate America's complicity
and complacency. When President Bush welcomed Israeli Prime Minister Ariel
Sharon, sometimes called the Butcher of Beirut, as "my dear friend" and "a
man of peace" after Israeli forces, using U.S.-donated arms, completed their
devastation of the West Bank last spring, worldwide anger against American
policy reached the boiling point.

The fury should surprise no one who reads foreign newspapers or listens to
BBC. In several televised statements long before 9/11,Osama bin Laden,
believed by U.S. authorities to have masterminded 9/11, cited U.S. complicity
in Israel's destruction of Palestinian society as a principal complaint.
Prominent foreigners, in and out of government, express their opposition to
U.S. policies with unprecedented frequency and severity, especially since
Bush announced his determination to make war against Iraq.

The lobby's intimidation remains pervasive. It seems to reach every
government center and even houses of worship and revered institutions of
higher learning. It is highly effective in silencing the many U.S. Jews who
object to the lobby's tactics and Israel's brutality.

Nothing can justify 9/11. Those guilty deserve maximum punishment, but it
makes sense for America to examine motivations promptly and as carefully as
possible. Terrorism almost always arises from deeply-felt grievances. If they
can be eradicated or eased, terrorist passions are certain to subside.


Today, a year after 9/11, President Bush has made no attempt to redress
grievances, or even to identify them. In fact, he has made the scene far
worse by supporting Israel's religious war against Palestinians, an alliance
that has intensified anti-American anger. He seems oblivious to the fact that
nearly two billion people worldwide regard the plight of Palestinians as
today's most important foreign-policy challenge. No one in authority will
admit a calamitous reality that is skillfully shielded from the American
people but clearly recognized by most of the world: America suffered 9/11 and
its aftermath and may soon be at war with Iraq, mainly because U.S. policy in
the Middle East is made in Israel, not in Washington.


Israel is a scofflaw nation and should be treated as such. Instead of helping
Sharon intensify Palestinian misery, our president should suspend all aid
until Israel ends its occupation of Arab land Israel seized in 1967. The
suspension would force Sharon's compliance or lead to his removal from
office, as the Israeli electorate will not tolerate a prime minister who is
at odds with the White House.

If Bush needs an additional reason for doing the right thing, he can justify
the suspension as a matter of military necessity, an essential step in
winning international support for his war on terrorism. He can cite a worthy
precedent. When President Abraham Lincoln issued the proclamation that freed
only the slaves in states that were then in rebellion, he make the
restriction because of "military necessity."

If Bush suspends U.S. aid, he will liberate all Americans from long years of
bondage to Israel's misdeeds.

---------------------------------------------------------------

Mr. Paul Findley, who served as a congressman from Illinois for