oklaski dla RON PAUL - duskusja kandydatow na prez

[misterpee]

bardzo ciekawe, sluchajcie jak entuzjasticznie publicznosc oklaskuje
Ron Paul. sluchajcie tych neokonskich agentow.



www.youtube.com/watch?v=8BB3NrSpRGE&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Elewrockwell%2Ecom%2Fblog%2F

www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cn2JTi1U59k&NR=1

RON PAUL wygra w totolotka

[felusiak1]

alboe w palanta z dziećmi ale nie nominację republikanów.
misterpee, wytnij i zachowaj do listopada przyszłego roku.

[misterpee]

i jezeli nie pogratulujecie Ron Paul, to historia wa sprzatnie na
smietnik.

Gratuluję Ronowi

[felusiak1]

i uparcie twierdzę, ze jego szanse na nominacje są bliskie zera.
Wytnij i zachowaj.

[kyle_broflovski]

www.youtube.com/watch?v=inyCkCvqRO0&v3

[misterpee]

swietne video jak dllowne media cenzuruja Ron Paula.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=KloETuVJx2c&NR=1

[krzyh001]

Chwyty stosowane przez prezenterów Fox News są na zastraszającym poziomie
całkowitym królem na tronie jest Bill'o Reilly, komentarz w stylu "Według ciebie
Ron powinniśmy brać strone Al-Kaidy i wycofać wojska z Iraku"(!)TO JEST
ABSURD(!) mają na celu tylko i wyłącznie zepchnięcie debaty na bok zniesławienie
swojego przedmówcy i zyskanie na czasie licząc na to że ogłupiała amerykańska
publika kupi tą całą propagandę i opowie się za utworzeniem nowego frontu jakim
jest Iran. Serdecznie polecam film www.imdb.com/title/tt0418038/
ukazujący zastraszającą potęgę korporacyjnych mediów,
I nie myślmy że to nas nie dotyczy... wystarczy spojrzeć na takie media jak TVN
TVN24,

Stosowanie chwytów

[felusiak1]

Chwyt stosowany przez ciebie krzyh001:
** Bill'o Reilly, komentarz w stylu "Według ciebie Ron powinniśmy brać strone
Al-Kaidy i wycofać wojska z Iraku"

Rzeczywistość: Chris Wallace a nie O'Reilly zapytał:
"So congresman Paul, and I'd like you to take 30 second to answer this, you're
basically saying we should take our marching orders from Al Qaida? If they want
us off Arabian Penninsula we should leave?"
Po polsku: Kongerman Paul, chciałbym aby w ciagu 39 sekund odpowiedział pan na
to pytanie. Mówi pan, że powinniśmy wykonywać rozkazy Al Kaidy? Jeśli oni chcą
abyśmy opuscili Półwysep Arabski
powinniśmy to zrobić?
Kongresman Paul odpowiedział gromkim "NO', po polski NIE.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=8BB3NrSpRGE&mode=related&search=
Słowa te zaczynaja sie dokładnie w 1:47/9:19.
FOX News ma wielu komentatorów a nie jedynie O'Reilly i Hannity.

[misterpee]

jest podobne jak CNN. Poprostu nie dac drugiej stronie dosjsc do
slowa. Najwieksza zbrodnia wojny w Iraku jest rozpoczecie tej wojny
przez Neokonow i wymuszenie na administracji USA takiej decyzji,
oraz oglupienie Amerykanow przez zaklamana propagande. Metoda ta
powtarzana jest tysiacleci. Pamietacie Pilata , ktory umywa rece.
Najlepiej cudzymi rekami wykonac zbrodnie.

[felusiak1]

Bzdetujesz misterpee. I nie miej do mnie pretensji lecz do krzyha. To on wstawia
kit a nie ja. Czy ty nie rozumiesz, ze klamstwo jest kłamstwem. Powinieneś
zrozumieć, ze nie ma potrzeby uciekania sie do kłamstwa aby przedstawić swój
punkt widzenia.
Zatem pytanie zadał Wallace a nie O'Reilly i brzmiało ono zgoła inaczej niż
napisał krzyh.

A Paul nie ma najmniejszych szans w primeries w przyszłym roku niezależnie od
tego ile głosów kupi w straw polls.

[misterpee]

jestes pedler tych samych mecenasow, ktorzy chca zamroczyc swiata
swoimi "liberalnymi" mediami. Pozdrowienia dla Krzyha. Vyc moze
Krzyhu nie przylepil zle nazwisko. Wazne jest ze Media nie prowadza
zadnej dyskusji , ale propagandowe krzyki.

[misterpee]

wez udzial w ankiecie i zobacz wyniki!

www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10562904/?polls=is_open

[misterpee]

www.vimeo.com/306606

[warmi2]

Taki sam poll na Fox News wyszedlby zupelnie inaczej ...

What's your point ?

usunac Busha to nie wszystko

[kraktoo]

jego trzeba postawic przed miedzynarodowym trybunalem! jego
prezydentura to najwieksza katastrofa w dziejach swiata..;(

[warmi2]

"prezydentura to najwieksza katastrofa w dziejach swiata"

No nie przesadzaj .... dojscie do wladzy Lorda Vadera i upadek
republiki galaktycznej bylo znacznie wieksza katastrofa.

[misterpee]

po przejeciu wladzy absolutnej, a to musi byc konsekwencja obecnych
wydarzen, Bush usunie tych ktorzy chcieli uzyskac wladze poprzez
Busza. W przeciwnym wypadku podzieli los swoich wrogow.

[misterpee]

Oczywiscie ze najpierw bedzie ignorowanie, jezeli to nie pomoze beda
nastepne metody podwazenia platformy i idei Ron Paula. Oligarchia
jest silna od dawna. Ale teraz moze byc rewolucja !


RON PAUL FIGHTS POWERFUL PLUTOCRACY

The more support Texas representative gains, the more the global
elite are taking notice



By Steven LaTulippe

Rep. Ron Paul (R-Tex.) is gaining steam in his presidential campaign
and the establishment is preparing to stop him at any cost. His
fundraising statistics reveal a blossoming, Internet-based movement
that is uniting libertarians and other concerned citizens from
across the political spectrum.

His performance in the media has been sharp, and his organization is
honing its message. But if Paul remains a viable candidate, he faces
a set of obstacles unlike any other. When evaluating his chances,
it’s important to understand contemporary America: This is not a
democracy and not a constitutional republic.

America is a carefully concealed oligarchy. A few thousand people,
mostly in government, finance, and the military-industrial complex,
run this country for their own purposes. By manipulating the two-
party system, influencing the mainstream media, and controlling the
flow of campaign finance money, this oligarchy works to secure the
nomination of its preferred candidates (Democratic and Republican
alike), thus giving voters a “choice” between Puppet A and
Marionette B.

Unlike the establishment’s candidates, Paul is a freelancer running
on specific ideas. The federal government must function within the
strict guidelines of the Constitution, should deconstruct its
empire, withdraw troops from around the world, reestablish a foreign
policy based on noninterventionism, abolish the Federal Reserve
Bank, eliminate fiat currency and return to hard money.

This is not a political agenda or party platform. It is a
revolution. The entire ruling oligarchy would be swept away if these
ideas were implemented. Every sentence, every word, every jot and
tittle of this agenda is unacceptable, repellent and hateful to
America’s ruling elite.

The reasons for this are obvious. Through its control of the Federal
Reserve, the banking elite makes billions of dollars in unearned
profits and exerts enormous influence over the American economy.
Countless industries and special interest groups (both foreign and
domestic) have sprung up around our so-called defense and national
security budgets. The bureaucratic elites who dominate the federal
government despise the Constitution’s limitations on their power and
view the document as just an archaic “piece of paper.”

They will not “walk away” if Paul is elected president. When its
authority over the Southern states was challenged in the 19th
century, the oligarchy suspended the Constitution and launched a
bloody war that killed three quarters of a million people. They
arrested newspaper editors, deported antiwar congressmen, and burned
down American cities.

A century later, the oligarchy nuked two Japanese cities, killing
thousands of civilians in the twinkling of an eye. When its marginal
interests were threatened in Southeast Asia, the oligarchy launched
a devastating war that killed over a million people and left the
region marinating in toxic defoliating chemicals.

To further its interests in the Middle East, the oligarchy slapped
horrific sanctions on Iraq that so far have killed 250,000 children
(and then trotted out Madeleine Albright—one of Clinton’s blood-
stained trolls—to smugly declare that the deaths were “worth it”).

If the oligarchy would behave this way to protect its often marginal
interests, what would it do to stop a devastating assault on its
very existence?

The attack on Paul will begin in earnest when it appears he has an
even remote possibility of winning. It will follow a fairly
predictable path: The first step is already in play. The
establishment will start by simply ignoring him, by using its power
in the mainstream media and their influence over campaign donors. It
will try excluding him from debates. This strategy is already
failing. The Internet and talk radio are outside the elite’s direct
control and are being used effectively by Paul to “get the message
out.” The
establishment will generate ridicule and fear mongering.

Paul’s ideas will be grotesquely distorted in establishment
media “hit pieces.” They’ll say he wants to permit heroin use in
public schools, or that he wants old people to die in the streets
without their Social Security checks, or that he wants to allow
greedy industrialists to dump toxic waste into your drinking water.

The next arrow in the oligarchy’s quiver will be scandal—real or
fabricated. Usually, this takes the form of pictures, billing
records, etc. involving financial or sexual hi-jinks. For these
folks, it would be child’s play to implicate him in some sort of
phony ethical, moral, or financial skullduggery (doctored pictures,
sordid media accounts from “eyewitnesses,” etc.).

If Paul somehow survives this assault, the oligarchy will move on to
the criminal justice system. On some fine day, a stretch limo will
pull up to the Capitol Building and one of the establishment’s hit
men (Jim Baker or maybe Vernon Jordan) will ooze into Paul’s office
for a “chat.”

Maybe Paul forgot to fill out Form X109/23W on his 1997 income tax
return? Or drained a mud puddle when he built his new house that
could be classified as a “wetland”? Or maybe a close relative is in
hot water with OSHA/FDA/IRS/youname-it (federal prosecutors love to
go after relatives
in order to gain “leverage”). Paul’s sentence could be lessened if
he agreed to drop his candidacy as part of a “plea bargain.”

Ayn Rand once stated that the hallmark of authoritarian systems is
the creation of innumerable, incomprehensible laws. Such systems
make everyone an un-indicted felon and allow for the exercise of
arbitrary government power via selective prosecution. If all this
failed and if Paul remained a threat to win the presidency, the
establishment may decide to let him take office and then use their
considerable influence to ensure his presidency ended in failure—
mostly through their control of Congress, the federal bureaucracy
and the mainstream media.

The oligarchy’s problem with this strategy is that it entails
considerable risk. As president, Paul could use the powers of the
office to inflict untold damage to the imperial structure
(especially if he chose to withdraw American troops stationed
overseas). Worse, he could appoint anti-tyranny “ideologues” to a
variety of positions in the federal government. The damage to the
oligarchs could take decades to undo.

Steven LaTulippe is a physician practicing in Ohio. He was an
officer in the Air Force for 13 years.

[warmi2]

Ok .. za okolo 1.5 roku , jak Bush odejdzie tak jak kazdy inny
prezydent ... ty pewnie bedziesz juz zajety sianiem jakichs innych
idiotycznych konspiracji i nawet nie bedziesz juz pamietal co
przepowiadales.

Ale ja ci przypomne - posmiejemy sie razem.

[misterpee]

Student ktory zadal niewygodne pytanie Kerry'iemu dostal pokazowe
potraktowanie prze policje. Ogladnijcie

www.youtube.com/watch?v=tCBcOQkUNjI

:D

[krzyh001]

pl.youtube.com/watch?v=QCE6J-Kv_7k
arnie mówi "terminate terrosrism"

Mala ankieta

[gosc88]

Kto z tu piszacych zyczylby RON PAUL'owi wygrania najblizszych
wyborow prezydenckich (2008) ?? Wystarczy odpowiedz: "JA" (nawet bez
uzasadnienia). No .... zaczynamy. Moja odpowiedz jest: "JA".

Poprawka ....

[gosc88]

Albo przynajnmniej zeby on byl zwyciezca jego partii w walce o
prezydenture.

Bill Maher jest "ZA" Ronem - z migawki CNN

[gosc88]

[misterpee]

i tanich kredytow w Kongresie;
www.youtube.com/watch?v=AeHWW5gbc0w