Dodaj do ulubionych

Pentagon under attack.

11.09.03, 15:05
I've been watching the documents about September the 11 attack on Pentagon,
on History Channel. Has anyone seen the aircraft hitting the building? I
have not. It's kind of weired. We all've seen the Twin Towers on fire after
the crash, but what about he Pentagon? Is it the one of unsolved mysteries?
Obserwuj wątek
    • wadziu Re: Pentagon under attack. 12.09.03, 13:03

      yeah You right , nobody seen the aircraft hitting the buiding.
      but you know why? because there wasn't any TV to record this crash, this is
      my opinion.
      WTC was in the center of the city and a lot of people had cameras.
      Do you think crash in Pentagon was goverment lie?

      wadziu
    • Gość: wacko jacko Re: Pentagon under attack. IP: *.nyc.rr.com 12.09.03, 13:24
      Well, well, well. There we go again.
      So what happend to the plane and peope on board?

      The conspiracy theorists never sleep.
    • Gość: B. Re: Pentagon under attack. IP: *.zetosa.com.pl / 192.168.202.* 12.09.03, 13:42
      I have a question concerning the quality of the recording of the planes hitting
      the Twin Towers. We can see the planes approaching the buildings and next
      hitting them and the record is just superb, so professional. I do not think
      that amateur camcorders could record all this at the very beginning of the
      attack. Maybe it is generally known but not by me, but wasn't it recorded by
      the people responsible for the attack who were waiting for the planes to crash
      into the towers?
      • brookie Re: Pentagon under attack. 12.09.03, 14:17
        Isn't it strange? Jewish amateurs taping the moment of crash from the balcony?
        It's like they were waiting for that moment.
        Coming back to the Pentagon. I was watching the program on History Channel
        last night- Moment by moment attack on the Pentagon. And there was the man
        taping the whole thing+ there were cameras on the car park. I was hoping to
        see the plain hitting the building, but...
        At first, just before the "crash" everyone expected the upcoming plain, there
        were two Hornets taking off. That was all taped. And then commercial break and
        after that smoke and panic. There is one minute missing in the document.
        The cameramen must have been paid off, I can't see any other explanation.
        • Gość: awalk Re: Pentagon under attack. IP: *.warszawa.sdi.tpnet.pl 12.09.03, 16:32
          A bit off topic but I think it is an excellent article worth reading tygodnik.onet.pl/1547,1132539,0,314254,dzial.html unfortnately in Polish
    • bigstrand Re: Pentagon under attack. 12.09.03, 17:12
      try this:
      www.asile.org/citoyens/numero13/pentagone/erreurs_en.htm
      • Gość: brookie Re: Pentagon under attack. IP: *.tnt3.per1.da.uu.net 13.09.03, 05:03
        Good pics, but no trace of the aircraft. I think that boeing with that amount
        of fuel and incredible speed would easily damage the entire buildind, not the
        certain wing. The whole scene makes me think of bombing as the most possible.
        And where are the witnesses?
        And the most important. What really happened to the aircraft???
      • kingfish _____POWER of SUGGESTION___===>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 13.09.03, 17:24
        Power of suggestion.

        It is easy to show a photograph and have people believe your interpretive
        suggestion of what you are looking at is what actually happened.

        It is even easier to see through it and come up with another interpretation
        since a photograph captures only a split of a second and we have no idea what
        happened before or after.

        Try this

        www.asile.org/citoyens/numero13/pentagone/erreurs_en.htm
        vs. This:

        www.kingfish.us.tf/flight77.swf
        • kingfish Re: _____POWER of SUGGESTION II ===>>> 13.09.03, 17:36
          This was in response to a claim that the aircraft superimposed over Pentagon
          was shown in proper proportions:


          www.kingfish.us.tf/24m.swf/
        • kingfish __________PS=========? 13.09.03, 18:00
          PS

          I never claimed to have any technical data or knowledge of how it happened.
          This was only to show how easy it is to suggest something based on photographs
          with out any prove or knowledge of what actually happened.


          Yours Truly
    • Gość: wacko jacko Re: Pentagon under attack. IP: *.nyc.rr.com 13.09.03, 06:17
      I was going to write a few words to expose some uneducated
      opinions voiced here. Well, I've decided not to. It would
      be nothing but waist of time. Dream on.
      • glory Re: Pentagon under attack. 13.09.03, 11:48
        Gość portalu: wacko jacko napisał(a):

        > I was going to write a few words to expose some uneducated
        > opinions voiced here. Well, I've decided not to. It would
        > be nothing but waist of time. Dream on.

        Come on, don't be like that. Waste a little bit of your time for us uneducated
        people. Nobody's dreaming here. Only facts are counting. So where are the
        pieces of the aircraft. There is a photo taken by the carpark camera, showing
        the huge bowl of fire. To me, it looks like the building was hit by the
        missile. Even if the plain hit the Pentagon, unfortunalelly for the
        terrorists, it hasn't done the expected damage!!!???
        • Gość: Brookie Re: Pentagon under attack. IP: *.tnt3.per1.temp.da.uu.net 13.09.03, 12:39
        • kingfish HUGE BOWL OF FIRE:==========> 13.09.03, 17:41
          glory napisał:

          of time. Dream on.
          >
          > Come on, don't be like that. Waste a little bit of your time for us
          uneducated
          > people. Nobody's dreaming here. Only facts are counting. So where are the
          > pieces of the aircraft. There is a photo taken by the carpark camera, showing
          > the huge bowl of fire.

          HUGE BOWL OF FIRE:

          www.kingfish.us.tf/2bimi.swf/














          To me, it looks like the building was hit by the
          > missile. Even if the plain hit the Pentagon, unfortunalelly for the
          > terrorists, it hasn't done the expected damage!!!???
    • Gość: wacko jacko OK, here you go IP: *.nyc.rr.com 13.09.03, 15:48
      Here are a few links:
      criticalthrash.com/terror/P1010013.JPG
      criticalthrash.com/terror/P1010016.JPG
      www.humanunderground.com/11september/s11-media/et7.jpg
      www.geoffmetcalf.com/pentagon/images/13.jpg
      0911.site.voila.fr/index.htm
      www.cs.purdue.edu/homes/cmh/simulation/phase1/image1/10sep02slow.gif
      The black boxes were found on friday, September 14th.
      If the plane didn't hit the Pentagon, what happend to it,
      where are the passengers? What knocked down the lamp
      poles outside the Pentagon?

      Special prize goes to B. whose post is so stupid and
      uneducated that I cry and cry and then laugh.
      Read for yourself: "I have a question concerning the

      quality of the recording of the planes hitting the Twin
      Towers. We can see the planes approaching the buildings
      and next hitting them and the record is just superb, so
      professional. I do not think that amateur camcorders
      could record all this at the very beginning of the
      attack. Maybe it is generally known but not by me, but
      wasn't it recorded by the people responsible for the
      attack who were waiting for the planes to crash
      into the towers?

      There is only one recording of the plane hitting the
      north tower. It was made by french camera crew who were
      in a process of making the story about New York
      firefighters. They were on a training drill a few blocks
      north of WTC.
      The plane hitting the south tower was filmed from every
      possible angle and was seen live on TV.
      Dear B. all the morning live shows (NBC's-Today,
      ABC's-Good Morning America, CBS's-Early Show and many
      others like Fox, CNN, MSNBC ) originate in New York.
      After the first hit, all the cameras were pointed at WTC.
      You have no idea what was NYC before 9-11. Tons of
      tourists, traffic jam and thousands of camcorders and
      cameras snapping and taping.
      You thesis that peole who flew the planes into the
      buildings are somehow connected to the people who filmed
      the event is so outlandish and so illigical and so
      idiotic that it is beyond the pale.
    • kingfish And for conspiracy lovers 13.09.03, 17:45

      Here is what happened in NY:

      www.kingfish.us.tf/superm.swf/

      PS
      Of course I’m just kidding. Supermen would NEVER!!!
    • perk To conspiracy kooks 13.09.03, 22:10
      www.serendipity.li/wot/holmgren01.htm
      • Gość: wacko jacko Re: To conspiracy kooks IP: *.nyc.rr.com 14.09.03, 01:51
        Elvis lives. That's a believe of many people.
        The fact that Elvis hasn't have a new song in years
        doesn't bother them. They say it's becase he's laying low
        but one day..... .
        God bless'em.
        • Gość: glory The King is still alive. IP: *.tnt3.per1.da.uu.net 14.09.03, 13:39
          What the hell are you talking about. Of course Elvis is alive. He is alone and
          feels extremely horny. Anyway, he's lately released two more songs "Little
          less conversation, little more action", and the second one....Sorry, I can't
          remamber the title. But the video clip is the best. There's one curvy chick in
          that video which is good couse I'm sick of anorectic bitches.
          Elvis likes the big asses. Oh yeah, that's another theory of conspiracy.
          • Gość: Elvis yes I am IP: *.mad.east.verizon.net 15.09.03, 19:23

Nie masz jeszcze konta? Zarejestruj się


Nakarm Pajacyka