WTC-dowod?

[Gość: maniekxxx]

www.geocities.com/killtown/

[Gość: maniekxxx]

natomiast tutaj sa dowody ze uzycie cell phone jak to
twierdzil rzad amerykanski podczas tzw ataku 9/11 bylo
niemozliwe ze wzgledow technicznych poniewaz cell phone
przestaja dzialac na wysokosciach powyzej 3.5 km a wlasnie
samoloty tzw porwane znajdowaly sie grubo powyzej 3.5
km.Rzad amerykanski twierdzil ze byly 2-3 rozmowy przez cell
phone z tych porwanych samolotow a wiec udowodniono nastepne
klamstwo!!----------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EXPERIMENTS REVEAL THAT
CELL PHONES COULD NOT
HAVE BEEN USED FROM AIRCRAFT
ON SEPTEMBER 11TH

Project Achilles
Part Two - February 25 2003

Equipment:
Diamond Katana four-seater (Empire Aviation)

cellphones:


1. Telus Mike/TELUS IDEN C1
2. BM Analog cellphone/Bell Mobility C2
3. Audiovox PCS (CDMA)/TELUS C3
4. Nokia GSM/ROGERS AT&T C4

Personnel:

Corey Barrington (pilot)
Darren Spicknell (operator - technician for Wireless Concepts, Inc)
Kee Dewdney (director)
Pat Dewdney (ground recorder)
Weather: unlimited ceiling, light scattered cloud at 3,000 and 25,000 feet,
visibility 15 miles, wind 5 knots from NW, air temperature -12 C.

For this experiment, we flew a circular route, instead of the elongated oval.
The circle centred on the downtown core and took us over most of the city
suburbs. All locations below are referred to the city centre and are always
about three miles distant from it.

Protocol:

At times specified by the director, the operator made a call to a specified
number, stating the code number of the cellphone (1 to 4) and the altitude. The
receiver recorded whatever was heard and the time the call was received.

At the first three altitudes of 2000, 4000, and 6000 feet abga each cellphone
was used once. At 8000 feet abga, only C2 and C3 were tried, C1 and C4 now
being hors de combat.

Results with timeline:



time (pm)
call no.
C#
loc.
operator
recorder








5:05
started taxi to runway





5:12
takeoff





5:14
at 2000 feet (above-ground altitude)





5:15
Call #1
C1
N
good
not very clear

5:17
Call #2
C2
W
good/unclear
not very clear

5:19
Call #3
C3
SW
no good


5:21
Call #4
C4
S
good
breaking up

5:24
climbed to 4000 feet abga





5:25
Call #5
C1
NE
no good


5:26
Call #6
C2
N
good
clear

5:27
Call #7
C3
NW
no good


5:29
Call #8
C4
W
no good


5:33
climbed to 6000 feet abga





5:34
Call #9
C1
SE
no good


5:36
Call #10
C2
E
no service


5:37
Call #11
C3
NE
³searching²no good


5:38
Call #12
C4
N
no service


5:39
Call #13
C1
NW
no service


5:40
Call #14
C2
SW
good/barely
clear

5:42
Call #15
C3
S
service - then lost


5:43
Call #16
C4
SE
no service


5:44
Call #17
C1
E
no service


5:45
Call #18
C2
NE
no service


5:45
Call #19
C3
NE
good/static
breaking up

5:46
Call #20
C4
N
no service


5:49
begin climb to 8000 feet abga (cellphones 2 and 3 only)





5:50
Call #21
C2
W
no service


5:50
Call #22
C3
SW
³searching²


5:51
Call #23
C2
S
good but static
buzzy

5:53
completed climb to 8000 feet abga





5:58
Call #24
C3
SE
won¹t call out


5:58
Call #25
C2
E
won¹t call out


5:58
Call #26
C3
E
no service


5:59
Call #27
C2
NE
good - then dead


6:00
Call #28
C3
N
no service


6:01
Call #29
C1
N
no service


6:01
Call #30
C2
NW
good - then dead


6:02
Call #31
C3
NW
no good


6:02
Call #32
C4
NW
no good


6:15
landed at airport






Conclusions: To the extent that the cellphones used in this experiment
represent types in general use, it may be concluded that from this particular
type of aircraft, cellphones become useless very quickly with increasing
altitude. In particular, two of the cellphone types, the Mike and the Nokia,
became useless above 2000 feet. Of the remaining two, the Audiovox worked
intermittently up to 6000 feet but failed thereafter, while the BM analog
cellphone worked once just over 7000 feet but failed consistently thereafter.
We therefore conclude that ordinary cellphones, digital or analog, will fail to
get through at or above 8000 feet abga.

In particular, the cellphone that worked best was the older, analog technology.
the operator explained, however, that it operates a lower frequency which has
slightly greater penetrating power.

Summary table



Altitude
calls tried
calls successful
percent success






2000
4
3
75%

4000
4
1
25%

6000
12
2
17%

8000
12*
1
8%


* includes three calls made while climbing; last successful call was made from
just over 7000 feet.

The four cellphones operated via four different cellular networks (cellsites).
Because calls were made from a variety of positions for each network, it cannot
be said that failures were the fault of cellsite placement. the london,
Ontario, region is richly supplied with cellsites belonging to five separate
networks.

It may be noted in passing that this experiment was also conducted in a radio-
transparent aircraft with carbon-fibre composite construction. Failure to make
a call from such an aircraft with any particular brand of cellphone spells
automatic failure for the same cellphone from a metal-clad aircraft flying at
the same altitude. A metal skin attenuates all cellphone signals to a
significant degree. It may safely be concluded that the operational ceiling for
cellphones in aluminum skin aircraft (most passenger liners, for example) would
be significantly lower than the ones reported here.

It may therefore safely be concluded that cellphone calls from passenger
aircraft are physically impossible above 8000 feet abga and statistically
unlikely below it.

A. K. Dewdney
February 25/03




"The chessboard is the world,
the pieces are the phenomena of the universe,
the rules of the game are the laws of nature.
The player on the other side is hidden from us."

[Gość: -]

z ktorego dnia jest to opracowanie?
jaki jest zwiazek miedzy ta praca a francuskim artykulem z przed roku ? Sadze
ze zdjec jest o wiele wiecej obecnie

[Gość: maniekxxx]

ta strone KILLTOWN znalazlem niedawno wiec niewiem za bardzo
o nich wiadomosci.Oczywiscie ze sa i nowsze zdjecia tylko
szukac trzeba duzo.

[Gość: maniekxxx]

tu jest wypowiedz bylego wieloletniego niemieckiego
ministra :ANDREAS VON BULOW ktory byl miedzy innymi ministrem
obrony i technologi w nietak odleglych czasach w niemczech na
temat tego tzw zamachu-jednym slowem wielka konspiracjia
zionistow amerykanskich!!!----------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERVIEW WITH Andreas Von Buelow
IN GERMAN DAILY, TAGESSPIEGEL January 13

VON BULOW INTERVIEW - A criticism of authorized King George W version of
September 11 story

http://www2.tagesspiegel.de/archiv/2002/01/12/ak-sn-in-558560.html
Source: Tagesspiegel, Jan. 12 - PARTIAL TRANSLATION below

The following interview by Stephan Lebert / Norbert Thomma with Andreas Von
Bulow appeared in the German newspaper Tagesspiegel, on Jan. 13, 2002

Q: You seem so angry, really upset.

Von Buelow: I can explain what's bothering me: I see that after the horrifying
attacks of Sept. 11, all political public opinion is being forced into a
direction that I consider wrong.

Q: What do you mean by that?

Von Buelow: I wonder why many questions are not asked. Normally, with such a
terrible thing, various leads and tracks appear that are then commented on, by
the investigators, the media, the government: Is there something here or not?
Are the explanations plausible? This time, this is not the case at all. It
already began just hours after the attacks in New York and Washington and--

Q: In those hours, there was horror, and grief.

Von Buelow: Right, but actually it was astounding: There are 26 intelligence
services in the U.S.A. with a budget of $30 billion--

Q: More than the German defense budget.

Von Buelow: --which were not able to prevent the attacks. In fact, they didn't
even have an inkling they would happen. For 60 decisive minutes, the military
and intelligence agencies let the fighter planes stay on the ground, 48 hours
later, however, the FBI presented a list of suicide attackers. Within ten days,
it emerged that seven of them were still alive.

Q: What, please?

Von Buelow: Yes, yes. And why did the FBI chief take no position regarding
contradictions? Where the list came from, why it was false? If I were the chief
investigator (state attorney) in such a case, I would regularly go to the
public, and give information on which leads are valid and which not.

Q: The U.S. government talked about an emergency situation after the attacks:
They said they were in a war. Is it not understandable that one does not tell
the enemy everything one knows about him?

Von Buelow: Naturally. But a government which goes to war, must first establish
who the attacker, the enemy, is. It has a duty to provide evidence. According
to its own admission, it has not been able to present any evidence that would
hold up in court.

Q: Some information on the perpetrators has been proven with documents. The
suspected leader, Mohammad Atta, left Portland for Boston on the morning of
Sept. 11, in order to board the plane that later hit the World Trade Center.

Von Buelow: If this Atta was the decisive man in the operation, it's really
strange that he took such a risk of taking a plane that would reach Boston such
a short time before the connecting flight. Had his flight been a few minutes
late, he would not have been in the plane that was hijacked. Why should a
sophisticated terrorist do this? One can, by the way, read on CNN (Internet)
that none of these names were on the official passenger lists. None of them had
gone through the check-in procedures. And why did none of the threatened pilots
give the agreed-upon code 7700 over the [Steuerknueppel: STEERING NOB?] to the
ground station? In addition: The black boxes which are fire and shock proof, as
well as the voice recordings, contain no valuable data--

Q: That sounds like--

Von Buelow: --like assailants who, in their preparations, leave tracks behind
them like a herd of stampeding elephants? They made payments with credit cards
with their own names; they reported to their flight instructors with their own
names. They left behind rented cars with flight manuals in Arabic for jumbo
jets. They took with them, on their suicide trip, wills and farewell letters,
which fall into the hands of the FBI, because they were stored in the wrong
place and wrongly addressed. Clues were left behind like in a child's game of
hide-and-seek, which were to be followed! There is also the theory of one
British flight engineer: According to this, the steering of the planes was
perhaps taken out of the pilots' hands, from outside. The Americans had
developed a method in the 1970s, whereby they could rescue hijacked planes by
intervening into the computer piloting [automatic pilot system]. This theory
says, this technique was abused in this case. That's a theory....

Q: Which sounds really adventurous, and was never considered.

Von Buelow: You see! I do not accept this theory, but I find it worth
considering. And what about the obscure stock transactions? In the week prior
to the attacks, the amount of transactions in stocks in American Airlines,
United Airlines, and insurance companies, increased 1,200%. It was for a value
of $15 billion. Some people must have known something. Who?

Q: Why don't you speculate on who it might have been.

Von Buelow: With the help of the horrifying attacks, the Western mass
democracies were subjected to brainwashing. The enemy image of anti-communism
doesn't work any more; it is to be replaced by peoples of Islamic belief. They
are accused of having given birth to suicidal terrorism.

Q: Brainwashing? That's a tough term.

Von Buelow: Yes? But the idea of the enemy image doesn't come from me. It comes
from Zbigniew Brzezinski and Samuel Huntington, two policy-makers of American
intelligence and foreign policy. Already in the middle of he 1990s, Huntingon
believed, people in Europe and the U.S. needed someone they could hate--this
would strengthen their identification with their own society. And Brzezinski,
the mad dog, as adviser to President Jimmy Carter, campaigned for the exclusive
right of the U.S. to seize all the raw materials of the world, especially oil
and gas.

Q: You mean, the events of Sept. 11--

Von Buelow: --fit perfectly in the concept of the armaments industry, the
intelligence agencies, the whole military-industrial-academic complex. This is
in fact conspicuous. The huge raw materials reserves of the former Soviet Union
are now at their disposal, also the pipeline routes and--

Q: Erich Follach described that at length in {Spiegel}: "It's a matter of
military bases, drugs, oil and gas reserves.''...

Von Buelow: I can state: the planning of the attacks was technically and
organizationally a master achievement. To hijack four huge airplanes within a
few minutes and within one hour, to drive them into their targets, with
complicated flight maneuvers! This is unthinkable, without years-long support
from secret apparatuses of the state and industry.

Q: You are a conspiracy theorist!

Von Buelow: Yeah, yeah. That's the ridicule heaped [on those raising these
questions] by those who would prefer to follow the official, politically
correct line. Even investigative journalists are fed propaganda and
disinformation. Anyone who doubts that, doesn't have all his marbles! That is
your accusation.

Q: Your career actually speaks against the idea that you are not in your right
mind. You were already in the 1970s, state secretary in the Defense Ministry;
in 1993 you were the SPD [Social Democratic Party] speaker in the Schalk-
Golodkowski investigation committee--

Von Buelow: And it all began there! Until that time, I did not have any great
knowledge of the