--------------------AQUANET-----------------------

[...]

[Gość: Stanisław Polański]

Wiadomość została usunięta ze względu na złamanie prawa lub regulaminu.

Jestem Józef Zawadzki.Mam imię.Mam nazwisko.Mam...

[Gość: Józef Zawadzki]

Gość portalu: Józek Zawadzki napisał(a): życiorys.Mam Tropienie Zbrodniczej
Działalności Antypolskiej.Piszę i Znaczę.

JZ MZ MTZDA PIZ !-)

*****JOZEF ZAWADZKI*****

[zupagrzybowa]

ODZNACZAM PANA DYREKTORA JOZEFA ZAWADZKIEGO
TYTULEM KLAuNA ROKU 5674 !!!
SWIATOWE ZYBOWSTWO JEST DUMNE
Z OSIAGNIEC PANA DYREKTORA!
OSZALEC MOZNA
SZALOM

PSYCHOZA !!! PSY!! KOZA!!! POTWORKI DO TWOREK!!!

[sanatorium_psychiatryczne]

--

www.jewish.org.pl/polskie/materialy/JewFAQ/graphics/hebrew.gif

©

OSAMA BIN LADEN GAZETY WYBORCZEJ !!!

[sanatorium_psychiatryczne]

CIA I MOSAD JEST NA TWOIM TroPIE...le :©
polKSIEZYCPoLglowkiPOLdUpka?
==============================
:©
TWOREK

6000letnie Drzewa ...

[zupagrzybowa]

"Walk in the sequoia woods at any time of year and you will say they are the
most beautiful and majestic on earth. Beautiful and impressive contrasts meet
you everywhere, the colors of tree and flower, rock and sky, light and shade,
strength and frailty, endurance and evanescence"
(John Muir)
============================================================
Generally accepted as the largest single living organism on earth, the General
Sherman tree is 30 feet thick at shoulder height, and 17 feet thick at a height
of 120 feet. The first branch of the tree is more than seven feet in diameter,
and the tree itself towers to a height of 275 feet. While not all giant
sequoias are as famous as the General Sherman, a walk through any of the
bigtree groves will make all other trees, as well as yourself, seem miniature
by comparison.

www.cof.orst.edu/cof/fr/outreach/treeomth/sequoia/images/seq5.gif

[patience]

Gość portalu: MeTaFiZyK napisał(a):

> EkoLoGia OdBYTu
> GW+NO
> saCrum=proFanum
> roZklad Idei ID+DEA
> deko Mpozycja,muTacje;
> ukLady jElitarne;
> sySStem TraWienny
> mowaTrawa;
> CywiLiZacjEJelitaGrubEgo
> FloRAbaKteRyjnA;
> ===========================================
> 2B or NOT 2B ....?
> 2B !!!-)

2B & 2b3

Kim Jong Il /od tylu/: II GNOJ NIK !!!

[zupagrzybowa]

I think that Kim Jong Il has reached a tipping point of sorts now. A definitive
move right now to release ALL of the prisoners from the camps and offer
compensation to them would go a long way towards changing the view of the rest
of the world on North Korea. Nothing else will do. On the other hand,
continuance of the current policies of mass imprisonment, murder, slave labor,
torture and deliberate starvation will soon reach the point where the world
will no longer tolerate it without taking action. And this action may not take
the form of war, it may not unfold predictably for the North Korean regime and
its leaders.
==============================================================

2B & 2b3 & & 6&3R
=;}

[patience]

www.google.pl/search?as_q=waiting+swf&num=50&hl=pl&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&btnG=Szukaj+z+Google&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&lr=&as_ft=i&as_filetype=&as_qdr=all
&as_occt=any&as_dt=i&as_sitesearch=


=============================
2B & 2b3 & & 6&3R &
=
hornyhumor.com/Animation/animations.php?directory=.¤tPic=17

[patience]

Powyżej pomyliłam się w pisaniu! Miało być tak:

www.google.pl/search?as_q=waiting+swf&num=50&hl=pl&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-
8&btnG=Szukaj+z+Google&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&lr=&as_ft=i&as_filetype=&as_qdr=all
&as_occt=any&as_dt=i&as_sitesearch=


=============================
2B & 2b3 & & 6&3R & ;}
=
hornyhumor.com/Animation/animations.php?directory=.¤tPic=17

www.gnojnik.ug.pl/Informacje%20o%20Gminie.htm

[patience]

www.piks.or.tv/person/kimryongsong.htm
www.ku.edu/carrie/archives/korean-war-l/2001/09/msg00095.html
www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/library/news/dprk/2001/dprk-010916-226128d9.htm

taamula

[zupagrzybowa]

תעמולה

[...]

[Gość: drKaRaLuch]

Wiadomość została usunięta ze względu na złamanie prawa lub regulaminu.

[...]

[Gość: <© >]

Wiadomość została usunięta ze względu na złamanie prawa lub regulaminu.

... CitizensOfTheGalaxy ...

[Gość: .:.]

EARTH (Sol III): Also known as "Terra." The planet Earth is divided up into
approximately 200 independent nation-states (though this number is subject to
change for one political reason or another). While some races consider this
lack of unity to be a sign of disorder and intraplanetary conflict, many
consider the structure a source of local pride, patriotism and even competition
leading to scientific and technological advances. A loose confederation of
representatives known as the "United Nations" functions as an international
legislature, and is located in New York City.

www.citizensofthegalaxy.com/Worlds.html#Earth
NAZIA (New Erde II): During Earth's second World War, a number of colonists
from the nation of Germany were transported by the Chromes to the planet Nazia,
where they continued to thrive until well into the twenty-first century.
During this time, a subspace barrier was placed around the system by operatives
from Trell Station One, in order to prevent a Nazi invasion of neighboring star
systems. Eventually, however, the barrier collapsed, wiping out the resident
population.
By the twenty-third century, the planet was re-colonized by the Zhelians.
(Trellian Sector)

Sensation and Perception

[sanatorium_psychiatryczne]

www-psych.stanford.edu/~lera/psych115s/

Funny Like That

[Gość: TTr]

Funny Like That
Episode 8, Part 3
The Last Resort
SCENE J
Interior - A hotel room. Night following Scene H.
The phone rings. Tippy enters and answers it.

TIPPY
Bon jour! (Not sure why French? Read Episode 8, Part 1, Scene C)

CLARK
I can’t believe he outed me.

TIPPY
I think he outed both of us.

CLARK
Yes, but everyone knew we were of the closet. They didn’t know I was out of my
mind.

TIPPY
Stop saying things like that. He’s just a little man. Don’t let him get to you.
Oh, I have to go. Our houseboy Greico is drawing my bath.

CLARK
Tippy….

TIPPY
All right, it’s some old woman named Celia who has a wart the size of a nickel
on her forehead. We’re calling her Celia, the Cyclopes.... Greco is actually my
masseur. Au revoir!


He hangs up the phone.
SCENE K
Exterior - Arians’ Resort. Around noon.
Clark and Richard are walking along a street.

CLARK
Thanks for meeting with me today. Do you mind if I use my tape recorder?

RICHARD
Of course not. I'm not ashamed of what I'm thinkin’. But you will make me
sound intelligent, right?

CLARK
(Knowing he can't change quotes.) Well….

RICHARD
(Smiling.) I’m only kiddin’. . Hey, let's stop in here at the David Duke Double
Dip Ice Cream Shop.

SCENE L
Interior - ice cream shop.

RICHARD
Let’s see, what are the specials today? Nazi Nuts and Caramel or Mein Kampf
Chip, which one do you want? My treat.

CLARK
Well, do they have vanilla?

RICHARD
They have Caucasian Creme. That's always been one of my favorites. Of course,
can’t have none of that darky hot fudge! No siree!! (Clark looks at his
aghast.) I’m only kiddin’.

An ice cream parlor employee, wearing all white including a hood with the name
of the ice cream parlor on it, walks up to the counter.

CLARK
(Aghast.) Yeah, I'll take the.... Caucasian Creme.

RICHARD
And I’ll have a Red Skin Praline.

The worker exits to prepare the ice cream cones.

RICHARD
So what kinda questions ya got for me?

CLARK
Well, shouldn't we wait until we sit down?

RICHARD
Oh, we ain't sittin’ down. I'm showin' you around. (Opens his arms.) This is my
home. I'm invitin’ you in. I want to show you every blade of grass here.

CLARK
Well, I don’t know if we'll have time for that.

RICHARD
You don’t seem like you’re comfortable in your own skin, son?

CLARK
What?

RICHARD
(Pulling back.) Nothin’.

The worker hands them their cones. Richard pays him. They exit.

SCENE M
Exterior - Arians’ Resort.Continuous.
Clark and Richard are walking down a sidewalk in the resort.

RICHARD
(Licking on his ice cream cone.) Well, fire away at me.

CLARK
What are your views on hatred in America today?

RICHARD
Oh, I think hatred’s wrong.

CLARK
OK, let’s call it bigotry. Some people think that bigotry is alive and well in
our country. In fact, it’s worse today than it was a few decades ago.

RICHARD
Now see, sometimes the history books paint things wrong. They don’t show the
world in contacts.

CLARK
You mean, context?

RICHARD
Yeah. You see, slavery was about economics. That’s all it was. Companies have
sweat shops today.

CLARK
And sweat shops are wrong.

RICHARD
But they’re here and we ain't startin' no war over 'em.. People hire folks for
as cheap as they can get them. Well, back then, they were just roundin' up
workers real cheap - for free! And slavery would still be around today if those
pesky courts hadn’t gotten involved. But the history books don’t tell you about
that. No siree! They don’t tell how some men in history get a bad name just
cause they’re standing up for their own people. Don’t you make tough decisions
at your job?

CLARK
Well, yes I have.

RICHARD
That’s all I’m talking about, too. Tough choices. Some men get a bad rap cause
they make tough decisions for the good of their people and for tryin’ to
preserve what is right in their heritage.

CLARK
Are you talking about Adolph Hitler?

RICHARD
I'm talkin' about everybody, son! You, me and everybody! That’s all I’m sayin’.
Oh! Look around! Look around! (He begins skipping.) Oh, I love this place!
Isn't it beautiful? The birds are singin’! The sun is out! This is where I am.
This is where I belong! (He stops skipping.) This is where I belong. This is
home!

CLARK
Yes, but the birds on sitting on the roof of the Triple K Bed and Breakfast.

RICHARD
Oh, that is a wonderful place! They play bingo on Thursday nights.

CLARK
Don't you think it's wrong to discriminate?

RICHARD
Now, ya see, I’ve got a New Age philosophy. I'm progressive. I don't have a
problem with all men who have dark skin. I just have a problem with the
niggers. People who are Jewish are OK, as long as they don't act like a Jew. If
you're gonna act like that, don't be ashamed to be called what you are. It's
like your little friend! He comes prancin’ in here with his Judy jam.

CLARK
It was Minnelli jelly.

RICHARD
Whatever you call it, he’s spreadin’ it on with his pinky in the air. You know
it’s true… (More emphatically.) You know it's true.

CLARK
He does have a pinky problem, yes.

RICHARD
But then he gets upset when I calls him like I sees him. People shouldn't get
upset about that. If it walks like a duck, walks like a duck, it's gonna fly
south for the winter!

CLARK
What about me, then?

RICHARD
(Uncertain.) What about you?

CLARK
I have a mental illness. You said so.

RICHARD
Did I?

CLARK
Yes, you did. So why don't you call me nuts?

Richard stares at him.

CLARK
Cause, you know, it's not that bad. People live with it every day. It's not the
end of the world.

Richard stares at him.

CLARK
Why don't you call me something? (Pause.) How about a loon? A crackpot? A nut
case. What about crazy as a shithouse rat? Why don't you call me that?

RICHARD
I can't.

CLARK
Why not? It would make me feel at home around here.

Long pause.

RICHARD
It’s too foreign to me. It bothers me more than words can say. It makes my
insides squirm.

Clark stares at him.

RICHARD
(Smiles.) What's your next question?

SCENE N
Interior - A small radio studio set up in a gift shop at the resort. An hour
later.
Brad is checking some equipment. Richard enters.

BRAD
Hey, Richard.

RICHARD
Hey, Buddy! How are on this glorious afternoon?

BRAD
Great, how about you?

RICHARD
Splendid.

BRAD
You’re cuttin’ it kinda close. We’re about to go on the air.

RICHARD
Well, I was just talkin’ to your newspaper friend. I don't know if he knows how
to take me.

BRAD
Well, Clark’s middle name is peculiar.

RICHARD
Well, he's living up to his name. But, I know you and I share a bond.

BRAD
(Uncertain.) You think so?

RICHARD
Oh, I know we do, son.

Pause.

BRAD
That’s nice….. Here's your mike.

RICHARD
Thanks.

BRAD
Are you ready? Here we go.

Intro music for the radio show 'Spill Your Guts.'

BRAD
Good afternoon, all your numbskulls out there! Welcome to "Spill Your Guts!"
We're here live from the Arians Resort with Richard Roof. Thanks for bein’ here
today, Richard.

RICHARD
Thank you for having me. And welcome to our little piece of paradise.

BRAD
Well, some people might call it your little corner of a swastika.

RICHARD
Haven’t you had a wonderful time down here, Brad? Isn’t the weather beautiful?
They say the ocean air is good for what ails you. What’s ailin’ you today, son.

BRAD
Well I do have corn on my left

GerMan Flying Saucer ?

[Gość: <©>]

www.salon.com/books/review/2002/08/05/zero_gravity/print.html
Cook concludes that by 1947 the U.S. must already have had a key component of
UFO technology

A ILE STALIN WYTLUKL NIEMCOW ?

[Gość: ©©©P]

www.marxists.org/reference/archive/stalin/

GDZIE JEST POLSKA PARTIA KOMUNISTYCZNA ?

[Gość: PPK]

The Communist Party of Poland

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Speech: Delivered at a Meeting of the Polish Commission of the Comintern, July
3, 1924;
First Published: Bolshevik, No. 11, September 20, 1924;
Source: J. V. Stalin, Works, Vol. 6, pp. 276-84, Foreign Languages Publishing
House, Moscow 1953.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Comrades, I have not sufficient material at my disposal to enable me to speak
as emphatically as some of those who have spoken here. Nevertheless, on the
basis of the material that I did, after all, manage to obtain, and on the basis
of the debate that has taken place here, I have formed a definite opinion,
which I would like to share with you.

Undoubtedly, the Polish Communist Party is in an abnormal state. That there is
a crisis in the Polish Party is a fact. It was admitted by Walecki; you have
all admitted it, and it was clearly revealed here, for it was noted that there
is discord in the Central Committee of the Polish Party between practical
workers who are members of the C.C. and the leaders of the C.C. Moreover, the
Central Committee of the Polish Party itself, at its plenums of December last
year and March this year, admitted in its resolutions that a number of its
actions had been of an opportunist character and it condemned them without
mincing words. That seems to be proof enough. I repeat, all this goes to show
that there is undoubtedly a crisis in the Communist Party of Poland.

What is the cause of this crisis?

The cause lies in certain opportunist transgressions committed in their
practical work by the official leaders of the Communist Party of Poland.

Permit me to quote a few examples confirming this statement.

The "Russian" question. Some Polish comrades say that this is a question of
external policy and, as such, is of no great importance for the Polish Party.
That is wrong. The "Russian" question is of decisive importance for the entire
revolutionary movement, in the West as well as in the East. Why? Because Soviet
power in Russia is the base, the bulwark, the haven of the revolutionary
movement all over the world. If in this base, i.e., in Russia, the Party and
the government begin to waver, it must cause very grave harm to the entire
revolutionary movement throughout the world.

During the discussion in our R.C.P.(B.) wavering began in the Party. By its
struggle against the Party, the opposition, which is essentially opportunist,
tended to shake, to weaken the Party, and hence, to weaken the Soviet power
itself; for our Party is the ruling party and the chief guiding factor in the
state. It is natural that wavering within the R.C.P.(B.) could eventually lead
to the wavering, the weakening of the Soviet power itself; and the wavering of
the Soviet power would mean harm to the revolutionary movement all over the
world. Precisely for this reason, disagreements within the R.C.P.(B.), and the
fate of the R.C.P.(B.) in general, cannot but directly affect the fate of the
revolutionary movement in other countries. That is why the "Russian" question,
although an external question for Poland, is one of prime importance for all
the Communist Parties, including the Polish Communist Party.

Well, what was the attitude of the leaders of the Polish Party towards
the "Russian" question? Whom did they support: the opportunist opposition or
the revolutionary majority in the R.C.P.(B.)? It is clear to me that in the
first period of the struggle within the R.C.P.(B.), the struggle against the
opportunist opposition, the leaders of the Polish Party unambiguously supported
that opposition. I shall not delve into the minds of Warski or Walecki; what
Warski was thinking when he wrote the well-known resolution of the Central
Committee of the Communist Party of Poland in support of the opposition in the
R.C.P.(B.) is of no importance for me. It is not people's intentions, but the
objective results of that resolution that are of primary importance for me. And
the objective results of that resolution are that it brings grist to the
opposition's mill. That resolution supported the opportunist wing of the R.C.P.
(B.). That is the whole point. At the time when the Central Committee of the
Polish Party adopted that resolution and sent it to the Central Committee of
the R.C.P.(B.) it represented the Polish branch of the opportunist opposition
within the R.C.P.(B.). If we regard the opposition within the R.C.P.(B.) as a
sort of business firm having branches in different countries, we can say that
at that time the Communist Party of Poland was the Polish branch of that firm.
That is the essence of the opportunist transgressions on the "Russian" question
committed by the leaders of the Polish Party. It is sad, but, unfortunately, it
is a fact.

The German question. Next to the "Russian" question, this one is of the
greatest importance, firstly, because Germany is more pregnant with revolution
than any other country in Europe; and secondly, because a revolutionary victory
in Germany would be victory in the whole of Europe. If a revolutionary upheaval
commences anywhere in Europe it will be in Germany. Only Germany can take the
initiative in this matter, and the victory of the revolution in Germany will
ensure the victory of the international revolution.

You know that last year a struggle flared up within the Communist Party of
Germany between its revolutionary majority and opportunist minority. You know
how greatly a victory of the Left or of the Right wing of the German Communist
Party would affect the whole course of the international revolution. Well, whom
did the leaders of the Central Committee of the Polish Communist Party support
in that struggle? They supported the Brandler group against the revolutionary
majority of the German Communist Party. That is now admitted by all, both
friends and foes. The same thing happened as on the "Russian" question. If we
assume that there is in Germany a sort of business firm in the shape of the
opportunist opposition in the Communist Party, then the Polish leaders were the
Polish branch of that firm. This, too, is sad, but you cannot go against facts;
facts must be admitted.

The method of fighting the opportunist opposition. Kostrzewa said that they,
i.e., the leaders of the Polish Central Committee, in essence support the
Russian Central Committee and, perhaps, the present German Central Committee,
but disagree with those bodies on the methods of fighting the Opposition. They,
you see, demand mild methods of fighting the opposition. They are in favour of
war against the opposition, but they want a war that will involve no
casualties. Walecki even went so far as to shout out: But we are in favour of
the "three"! I must say that nobody demands that Walecki should say ditto to
the Russian Central Committee in everything. Besides, I don't know who
these "three" are about whom Walecki is so enthusiastic. He has forgotten that
nobody is obliged to say ditto to the Russian Central Committee in everything
(Walecki, from his seat: "I am not obliged to, but I can.") Of course, you can,
but one ought to realise that such conduct places both Walecki and the Russian
Central Committee in an awkward position. It is not at all a matter of saying
ditto. The point is that in Russia, under the conditions of the NEP, a new
bourgeoisie has arisen which, being unable to come into the political arena
openly, is trying to breach the communist front from within and is looking for
champions among the leaders of the R.C.P.(B.). Well, this circumstance is
giving rise to oppositionist sentiments within the R.C.P.(B.) and is creating
the ground for an opportunist deviation. Hence, the point is that

GDZIE ?

[Gość: KPP]

The Communist Party of Poland 2

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

www.marxists.org/reference/archive/stalin/butcher2.jpg
The R.C.P.(B.) fought opportunism by the tried and tested method of resolutely
isolating the opportunist leaders. And the result it achieved was that
revolutionary Marxism triumphed and the Party acquired exceptional unity.

I think that the experience of the R.C.P.(B.) should serve as a lesson for us.
The method of fighting recommended by Kostrzewa is a hang-over from Social-
Democratic opportunism. It is fraught with the danger of a split in the Party.

Lastly, the question of leadership of the Party. What is the characteristic
feature of the development of the Communist Parties in the West at the present
time? It is that the parties have come right up against the question of
reorganising their practical activities on new, revolutionary lines. It is not
a matter of adopting a communist programme or of proclaiming revolutionary
slogans. It is a matter of reorganising the parties' everyday work, their
practical activities, along such a line that every step and every action they
take should naturally lead to the revolutionary education of the masses, to
preparation for revolution. That is now the essence of the matter and not the
adoption of revolutionary directives.

Yesterday, Pruchniak read here a whole string of revolutionary resolutions
adopted by the leaders of the Polish Central Committee. He read those
resolutions with a triumphant air, believing that leadership of the Party
consists solely in drafting resolutions. He has no inkling that drafting
resolutions is only the first step, the beginning of leadership of the Party.
He does not realise that, at bottom, leadership consists not in drafting
resolutions, but in the implementation of them, in putting them into effect. As
a consequence, in his long speech he forgot to tell us what became of those
resolutions; he did not deem it necessary to tell us whether the Communist
Party of Poland has carried out those resolutions, and to what extent. And yet,
the essence of Party leadership consists precisely in the implementation of
resolutions and directives. Looking at him, I was reminded of the typical
Soviet bureaucrat called to "report" to an inspection commission. "Has such and
such a directive been carried out?" the inspection commission asks. "Measures
have been taken," answers the bureaucrat. "What measures?" the inspection
commission asks. "Orders have been issued," the bureaucrat answers. The
inspection commission calls for the document. With a triumphant air the
bureaucrat presents a copy of the orders. The inspection commission asks: "What
has become of these orders? Were they carried out and if so, when?" The
bureaucrat looks blank, and says "We have received no information." Of course,
the inspection commission calls such a bureaucrat to account. It was precisely
such a Soviet bureaucrat that Pruchniak reminded me of when he, with a
triumphant air, read the revolutionary resolutions, concerning the
implementation of which he has "no information." That is not leadership of the
Party; it is a mockery of all leadership.

What are the conclusions? The conclusions can be summed up as follows.

Firstly. In the forthcoming Party discussion in Poland, I am emphatically
opposed to any dividing line being drawn between the former Polish Socialist
Party and the former Social-Democracy. That would be dangerous for the Party.
The former P.S.P. and P.S.D. have long been merged in a single party and are
jointly fighting the Polish landlords and bourgeoisie. To divide them now
retrospectively into two parts would be a profound error. The fight must not be
waged along the old line as between the P.S.P. and P.S.D., but along the new
line of isolating the opportunist wing of the Communist Party of Poland.
Complete victory over the opportunist wing — that is the guarantee against a
split and the guarantee of the Party's unity.

Secondly. I am emphatically opposed to the so-called amputation method, i.e.,
to the removal of certain members of the Central Committee from that body. In
general, I am opposed to the reorganisation of the Central Committee from
above. It must be borne in mind that surgical operations carried out when there
is no imperative need for them leave a bad aftermath in the Party. Let the
Communist Party of Poland itself reorganise its Central Committee at the
forthcoming congress or conference. It is inconceivable that a growing party
should not promote new leaders.

Thirdly. I think that the practical proposals put forward by Unszlicht are
quite correct. It would be quite rational to set up in place of the present
Organising Bureau and Political Bureau, which have become divorced from each
other, a single political and practical centre consisting of members of the
present Polish Central Committee.

Doubts have been expressed here about the theoretical knowledge and party
experience of the new leaders who have come to the fore in the revolutionary
struggle in Poland. I think that this circumstance is not of decisive
importance. There have been cases in the life of the R.C.P.(B.) when workers
with inadequate theoretical and political knowledge became the heads of huge
regional organisations. But those workers proved to be better leaders than many
intellectuals who lack the necessary revolutionary intuition. It is quite
possible that at first things will not run quite smoothly with the new leaders,
but there will be no harm in that. They will stumble once or twice, but
eventually they will learn to lead the revolutionary movement. Trained leaders
never fall from the skies. They grow up only in the course of the struggle.

www.marxists.org/reference/archive/stalin/works/1924/07_03.htm

DENAZYFIKACJA!!! DIABOLICAL MATERIALISM !!

[sanatorium_psychiatryczne]

dialectics is the study of the contradiction...

[sanatorium_psychiatryczne]

"In its proper meaning," Lenin says, "dialectics is the study of the
contradiction within the very essence of things." (Lenin, Philosophical
Notebooks, p. 265.)


And further:



"Development is the 'struggle' of opposites." (Lenin, Vol. XIII, p. 301.)


Such, in brief, are the principal features of the Marxist dialectical method.

It is easy to understand how immensely important is the extension of the
principles of the dialectical method to the study of social life and the
history of society, and how immensely important is the application of these
principles to the history of society and to the practical activities of the
party of the proletariat.

If there are no isolated phenomena in the world, if all phenomena are
interconnected and interdependent, then it is clear that every social system
and every social movement in history must be evaluated not from the standpoint
of "eternal justice" or some other preconceived idea, as is not infrequently
done by historians, but from the standpoint of the conditions which gave rise
to that system or that social movement and with which they are connected.

The slave system would be senseless, stupid and unnatural under modern
conditions. But under the conditions of a disintegrating primitive communal
system, the slave system is a quite understandable and natural phenomenon,
since it represents an advance on the primitive communal system

The demand for a bourgeois-democratic republic when tsardom and bourgeois
society existed, as, let us say, in Russia in 1905, was a quite understandable,
proper and revolutionary demand; for at that time a bourgeois republic would
have meant a step forward. But now, under the conditions of the U.S.S.R., the
demand for a bourgeois-democratic republic would be a senseless and
counterrevolutionary demand; for a bourgeois republic would be a retrograde
step compared with the Soviet republic.

Everything depends on the conditions, time and place.

It is clear that without such a historical approach to social phenomena, the
existence and development of the science of history is impossible; for only
such an approach saves the science of history from becoming a jumble of
accidents and an agglomeration of most absurd mistakes.

Further, if the world is in a state of constant movement and development, if
the dying away of the old and the upgrowth of the new is a law of development,
then it is clear that there can be no "immutable" social systems, no "eternal
principles" of private property and exploitation, no "eternal ideas" of the
subjugation of the peasant to the landlord, of the worker to the capitalist.

Hence, the capitalist system can be replaced by the socialist system, just as
at one time the feudal system was replaced by the capitalist system.

Hence, we must not base our orientation on the strata of society which are no
longer developing, even though they at present constitute the predominant
force, but on those strata which are developing and have a future before them,
even though they at present do not constitute the predominant force.

In the eighties of the past century, in the period of the struggle between the
Marxists and the Narodniks, the proletariat in Russia constituted an
insignificant minority of the population, whereas the individual peasants
constituted the vast majority of the population. But the proletariat was
developing as a class, whereas the peasantry as a class was disintegrating. And
just because the proletariat was developing as a class the Marxists based their
orientation on the proletariat. And they were not mistaken; for, as we know,
the proletariat subsequently grew from an insignificant force into a first-rate
historical and political force.

Hence, in order not to err in policy, one must look forward, not backward.

Further, if the passing of slow quantitative changes into rapid and abrupt
qualitative changes is a law of development, then it is clear that revolutions
made by oppressed classes are a quite natural and inevitable phenomenon.

Hence, the transition from capitalism to socialism and the liberation of the
working class from the yoke of capitalism cannot be effected by slow changes,
by reforms, but only by a qualitative change of the capitalist system, by
revolution.

Hence, in order not to err in policy, one must be a revolutionary, not a
reformist.

Further, if development proceeds by way of the disclosure of internal
contradictions, by way of collisions between opposite forces on the basis of
these contradictions and so as to overcome these contradictions, then it is
clear that the class struggle of the proletariat is a quite natural and
inevitable phenomenon.

Hence, we must not cover up the contradictions of the capitalist system, but
disclose and unravel them; we must not try to check the class struggle but
carry it to its conclusion.

Hence, in order not to err in policy, one must pursue an uncompromising
proletarian class policy, not a reformist policy of harmony of the interests of
the proletariat and the bourgeoisie, not a compromisers' policy of
the "growing" of capitalism into socialism.

Such is the Marxist dialectical method when applied to social life, to the
history of society.

As to Marxist philosophical materialism, it is fundamentally the direct
opposite of philosophical idealism.



2) Marxist Philosophical Materialism
The principal features of Marxist philosophical materialism are as follows:

a) Materialist

Contrary to idealism, which regards the world as the embodiment of an "absolute
idea," a "universal spirit," "consciousness," Marx's philosophical materialism
holds that the world is by its very nature material, that the multifold
phenomena of the world constitute different forms of matter in motion, that
interconnection and interdependence of phenomena as established by the
dialectical method, are a law of the development of moving matter, and that the
world develops in accordance with the laws of movement of matter and stands in
no need of a "universal spirit."



"The materialistic outlook on nature," says Engels, "means no more than simply
conceiving nature just as it exists, without any foreign admixture." (Marx and
Engels, Vol. XIV, p. 651.)


Speaking of the materialist views of the ancient philosopher Heraclitus, who
held that "the world, the all in one, was not created by any god or any man,
but was, is and ever will be a living flame, systematically flaring up and
systematically dying down"' Lenin comments: "A very good exposition of the
rudiments of dialectical materialism." (Lenin, Philosophical Notebooks, p. 318.)

b) Objective Reality

Contrary to idealism, which asserts that only our consciousness really exists,
and that the material world, being, nature, exists only in our consciousness'
in our sensations, ideas and perceptions, the Marxist philosophical materialism
holds that matter, nature, being, is an objective reality existing outside and
independent of our consciousness; that matter is primary, since it is the
source of sensations, ideas, consciousness, and that consciousness is
secondary, derivative, since it is a reflection of matter, a reflection of
being; that thought is a product of matter which in its development has reached
a high degree of perfection, namely, of the brain, and the brain is the organ
of thought; and that therefore one cannot separate thought from matter without
committing a grave error. Engels says:



"The question of the relation of thinking to being, the relation of spirit to
nature is the paramount question of the whole of philosophy.... The answers
which the philosophers gave to this question split them into two great camps.
Those who asserted the primacy of spirit to nature ... compr

[...]

[Gość: snajper8]

Wiadomość została usunięta ze względu na złamanie prawa lub regulaminu.

[patience]

"In my utopia, human solidarity would be seen not as a fact to be recognized by
clearing away "prejudice" or burrowing down to previously hidden depths but,
rather, as a goal to be achieved. Is it to be achieved not by inquiry but by
imagination, the imaginative ability to see strange people as fellow sufferers.
Solidarity is not discovered by reflection but created. It is created by
increasing our sensitivity to the particular details of the pain and
humiliation of other, unfamiliar sorts of people" --Richard
Rorty, "Contingency, Irony and Solidarity"

Richard Rorty

[patience]

[patience]

[patience]

RED _RUM_DNA_LAETS SWEJG _NIK CU F___

[Gość: LARS F.]

LE ARS IO THTA ED
compIddish

[...]

[Gość: JiDEO]

Wiadomość została usunięta ze względu na złamanie prawa lub regulaminu.

[...]

[Gość: Józef Zawadzki]

Wiadomość została usunięta ze względu na złamanie prawa lub regulaminu.

[...]

[Gość: PLO-ZOO-IZM]

Wiadomość została usunięta ze względu na złamanie prawa lub regulaminu.

UZA GOD YDYZ !!!

[Gość: YDYZ]

Fish
[Sobleytn]

Stripéd yellow and electric blue
Mouth stupidly pursed
Fins undulating nonchalant
Silent as life or death.

Fish are ridiculous but sane.
Fish are easily tempted but rarely give in.
Eating fish is sacrilege. Kissing fish is good.
Fish are better than you unless you are one.

Elegant purveyours of common wisdom
Often denying their true identity
Unlikely to affect your life significantly
They swim on, on.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Translator's comments:

Like the neighboring Muladz and Endzy tribes, and despite their current
reputation as fierce landholders, the earliest Iddish were a coastal people;
there is no reason to doubt that this poem, and the importance (if not
centrality) of fish in the Iddish mythos, dates back to ancient times. Unlike
Neptune of Western folklore, sea creatures to the Iddish are hardly
anthropomorphized or granted undue intelligence; they are instead seen as not
too bright, stubborn, but possessed of a certain mystery that the Iddish find
inexplicably alluring. Indeed, who among us has not stared for long hours into
a fishtank and wondered: if a fish does not think, what does it not think about?

There is some controversy among the current generation of Iddish scholars about
the best way to translate the third line of the second stanza, rendered above
as "Eating fish is sacrilege. Kissing fish is good." This may sound strange to
Western ears, and indeed, the original, "Ergroszo sobleytzso iydatn, diglaszo
sobleytzsi erdatn", while undeniably mellifluous, sounds grammatically (and
conceptually) strange to the modern Iddish ear, especially in the context of
the rest of the poem--why should eating them be sacrilegious? We may perhaps
assume that the line was originally constructed by some clever Old Iddish poet
(a primitive William Shakespeare?) more intent on creating an amusing-sounding
line than on communicating any deep meaning. Or perhaps the poem was altered in
the Early Middle Iddish period through the sometimes farcical retellings of
boisterous travelling storytellers as they tried to liven up those dark times.
Nevertheless, by the Middle Middle Iddish period, this line was already being
taken very seriously by conservative Iddish hardliners; eating fish was
punishable by death during the reign of Szylny II.

www.rictus.com/iddish/