Smolensk questions

07.06.10, 08:57
1.TAWS system which was part of TU-154 equipment is practically
faultless . No accident has been recordeed of aircraft having TAWS
installed since 1990 . How was it functioning in that case ?
2.TU-154 was equipped with radar height measuring device RW-5M ,
having accuracy of 0.8m .Was it functioning properly ?
3.Who was replacing or installing light bulbs in Smolensk airfield
landing system ?
Sergey Serebro from „Golos Vitebska” paper took photos of that
4.Why Prime Minister’s Tusk office allocated only one plane to
transport President , all chiefs of staff of Polish Army , heads of
main state institutions including Polish National Bank
Governer ,parliamentary leaders , National Security Office Head
and Ombudsman ?
5.First reports said that Russians did not carry out autopsy of
corpses . Late on it was found out that autopsies were done ,
without families’ consent . Polish prosecutors were not present
during those autopsies .Why ?
6.Other sources specify that identifictions were done on
photographs’ basis .How trustful is such identification ?
7.Polish-Russina agreement of 7th July 1993 allows mutual
investigation in case of such accidents .Why Tusk government did not
want to use that opportunity and allowed Russian side to take total
contol of investigation ?
8.Why Tusk government refused to appoint international commission
for investigation of Smolensk crash ? Smolensh crash was
unprecedented in world’s history so , consequently , unprecedented
measures should be applied , even if these measures were not
specified expressis verbis in international agreements
9.What exactly were Polish governments’ requests towards Russians
just after 10/04 ?
Immediately after the crash Russian side seemed to be open for
Polish proposals
10.Why personal belongings ,laptops and mobile phones of Polish
President and other Polish leaders were handed over by Russians
after a whole week ? To copy mobile phones and laptops’ software
couple of minutes is sufficient
11.Informations kept on those phones and laptops were also NATO
secrets . Why Tusk government did not ask NATO for help in that
investigation ?
12.What happened to encrypting devices which ,probably , were on
board of the plane ?
13.Is it true that 10/04 presidential flight had lower security
status than flight with PM Tusk 3 days earlier ? Gen. Janicki ,
head of Polish Secret Service (BOR) said that he got to know who
exactly is onboard the 10/04 plane only after the crash
14.As the consequence , the Russians treated 10/04 flight as a
private one , while the Polish as
the state flight . Who on the Polish side was responsible for
notifying Russians ?
15.In Smolensk there were no Polish Military Police officers to take
care of Polsich military heads . Why ?
16.Why Russians needed 7 weeks to hand out transcripts of black
boxes to Polish side ?
17.Whe the original black boxes were not handed out to the Polish
yet ?
18.Polish black box , R-128 device ( much more sophisticated than
Russina black boxes )which could not be read by Russians due to lack
of software , was handed over to Russians by Polish government .
Why ? Was it analyzed beforehand ?
19.Amateur mobile phone movie , lasting 1.24min , made by Andrey
Mendiy just after the crash showed unidentified people , Polish
and Russian voices and gunshoot blasts . Was it analyzed ?
20.Just after the crash Russians seized cameras and recorders of
Polish journalists . Were these analyzed ? Were these returend to
the owners later on ?
21.Who was personally responsible in Smolensk airfield for air
traffic control ?
Reports say that chief traffic contoller from Smolensk retired 3
days after the crash
22.That plane , made in USSR , was serviced in Russia couple of
months earlier . Is the full record of that overhaul avilable ? Was
it checked by Polish security after that service ?
23.There were no ambulances available on the airfield . Was that
verified ?
24.According to some testimonials , there were 2 other planes
present in the vicinity of Smolensk around crash time : Belorussian
and Russian one .Was it checked ?
25.Jaroslaw Kaczynski , president’s brother , landed 10/04 , after
the crash , in nearby Vitebsk one hour earlier that Mr Tusk , but
arrived to Smolensk after Mr Tusk , whose convoy overtook Jaroslaw
Kaczynski convoy on the road . Why ? People who were accompanying J.
Kaczynski testified ,that in Belorussia convoy was speeding , but
after it crossed Russian border it slowed down significantly and it
took 2.5hrs to cover 60kms to Smolensk . Why ?
26.The site was not properly secured by the Russians .
You can see from CNN report 11/04 that everybody could take any
evidence from crash site www.youtube.com/watch?v=ByQnbPfifBk
For comparison , Lockerbie crash site was secured and searched by
1000 policemen for 5 months
27. 3 weeks afer the crash Polish visiors still could find ,
unsecuered on crash site , personal belongings , passport ,
documents , clothes parts , aircraft parts etc. Local Russians
offered them other evidences for cash
www.naszdziennik.pl/index.php?dat=20100507&typ=po&id=po41.txt
www.naszdziennik.pl/index.php?dat=20100510&typ=po&id=po01.txt
Tusk’s government health minister Ewa Kopacz , who was present at
the site , said in Polish
Parliament later that „entire area was searched 1 meter deep „ . How
trustful is such statement ?
28.Meaconing ( taking over navigation signals and then re-sending
them , modified ,on the same frequency ) hypotesy was exclueded at
the very begfinning of investigation . Why ? Russians are well known
specialists of electronic warfare since Soviet times .
29.Smolensk airfield radioposts (MDB ) layout is nonstandard (
further post is 4kms away from tarmac ,instead or standard 6kms) .
Have pilots know about it ?
30.For more than a week the official crash time was stated as 08.56
AM (Polish time ) .Power line was cut at 08.39.54 , immediately
before the crash . Why was this 16min. gap maintained as official
crash time for so long ?
31.There has to be the grup of Poles at the airport , waiting fo the
plane ( security , diplomats , drivers ) . Why their reports were
not published ?
32.Polish Secret Service (BOR ) was responsible for security . Why
there were only 3 BOR officers present at the Smolensk airfield ,
waiting for the plane ?
33.Initial readings from black box say that pilots were sure that
the plane was following proper landing path till almost the last
moment . Only 16 sec before the crash they realized that something
is wrong . Why ? What went wrong ? Pilots were experienced ones ,
certainly without suicidal incliniations , as some Russian papers
suggest
34.Shortly before the crash , Russian Il-76 was trying to land at
the same airfield , but finally abandoned landing and went away .
Polish side had no access to testimonials of Il-76 crew , its’ black
boxes were not analyzed and erased. Why ?
35.Polish government asked NATO only several days after the crash
for assistance. Not only Polish , but NATO secrets were onboard .
What satellite pictures from before , during and after the crash are
available ?
36.The initial reason why Polish president and PM were flying to
Katyn on 2 separate planes in 3 days difference ( 07/04 and 10/04 )
was PM Putin’s invitation to PM Tusk in February for „mutual
celabration” of Russian and Polish Pms . Tusk agreed , t
    • Gość: honisoit Re: Smolensk questions IP: 82.177.32.* 23.07.10, 20:28
      Are you really accusing someone of a plot to murder 96 people or are you just
      criticising the chaos arising from a major recently unprecedented accident. It
      only takes an amateur tactician to work out that the only side to gain
      politically from such an accident would be the side that suffered. It doesn't
      look like any of Poland's allies believe in foul play and I don't suspect you
      are suggesting this was self-inflicted to boost the popularity of a flagging
      presidency. The undignified reactions of PiS now rather more suggest an attempt
      to steal the political limelight, waste time, act against the democratic wishes
      of the country as a whole, and possibly smokescreen some rather serious
      allegations against a few high ranking PiS celebrities. I think you will just
      have to be patient and wait for the answers to your questions which will have
      unsurprising answers. Nobody is going to force you to believe the truth
      in the way that some would like to force us to believe their theories. Honi
      soit qui mal y pense!
    • omastall Re: Smolensk questions 03.08.10, 23:37
      We are all sick and tired with all those questions. It was a plane
      catastrophe, not a crime. One can multiply questions to get Poles in
      the muddle about this tragedy, but it doesn't make much sense at
      all.
Pełna wersja