Sprawa USS "Liberty" wraca!

[Gość: Wuj Ingmar]

"Przyjaciele" Ameryki będą się gniewać, że im nie zapomniano morderstwa.

story.news.yahoo.com/news?
tmpl=story&u=/ap/20031023/ap_on_go_ot/spy_ship_israel_4
www.news.scotsman.com/latest.cfm?id=2085810

"WASHINGTON - A former Navy attorney who helped lead the military
investigation of the 1967 Israeli attack on the USS Liberty that killed 34
American servicemen says former President Lyndon Johnson and his defense
secretary, Robert McNamara, ordered that the inquiry conclude the incident
was an accident.

In a signed affidavit released at a Capitol Hill news conference, retired
Capt. Ward Boston said Johnson and McNamara told those heading the Navy's
inquiry to "conclude that the attack was a case of 'mistaken identity'
despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary."

[fredzio54]

Ale dostali w morde od naszego IAF bo wsadzili nos i byli jako sowjeci
zauwazeni !
VIVA IAF nasze chlopcy nasza potega !

[Gość: Wuj Ingmar]

Tak, Fredziu, nie uzbrojony okręt "dostał w mordę", jak łaskawie się
wyraziłeś. Dostał dlatego, że samoloty z amerykańskiego lotniskowca, lecące mu
na ratunek, zostały zawrócone z przyczyn politycznych. Szkoda, bo znacznie
lepiej by było, gdyby waszymi "bohaterami" z IAF nakarmiono rybki.

[Gość: Flader]

fredzio54 napisał:

> Ale dostali w morde od naszego IAF bo wsadzili nos i byli jako sowjeci
> zauwazeni !



Nie potraficie glupki Amerykana od Ruska odróżnic? Ale mi lotnicy

[Gość: Kerr]

Cover-Up Alleged in Probe of USS Liberty
Wed Oct 22, 8:47 PM ET Add U.S. Government - AP to My Yahoo!


By JENNIFER C. KERR, Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON - A former Navy attorney who helped lead the military investigation
of the 1967 Israeli attack on the USS Liberty that killed 34 American
servicemen says former President Lyndon Johnson and his defense secretary,
Robert McNamara, ordered that the inquiry conclude the incident was an
accident.


AP Photo


AP Photo
Slideshow: Mideast Conflict




In a signed affidavit released at a Capitol Hill news conference, retired Capt.
Ward Boston said Johnson and McNamara told those heading the Navy's inquiry
to "conclude that the attack was a case of 'mistaken identity' despite
overwhelming evidence to the contrary."


Boston was senior legal counsel to the Navy's original 1967 review of the
attack. He said in the sworn statement that he stayed silent for years because
he's a military man, and "when orders come ... I follow them."


He said he felt compelled to "share the truth" following the publication of a
recent book, "The Liberty Incident," which concluded the attack was
unintentional.


The USS Liberty was an electronic intelligence-gathering ship that was cruising
international waters off the Egyptian coast on June 8, 1967. Israeli planes and
torpedo boats opened fire on the Liberty at what became known as the outbreak
of the Israeli-Egyptian Six-Day War.


In addition to the 34 Americans killed, more than 170 were wounded.


Israel has long maintained that the attack was a case of mistaken identity, an
explanation that the Johnson administration did not formally challenge. Israel
claimed its forces thought the ship was an Egyptian vessel and apologized to
the United States.


After the attack, a Navy court of inquiry concluded there was insufficient
information to make a judgment about why Israel attacked the ship, stopping
short of assigning blame or determining whether it was an accident.


It was "one of the classic all-American cover-ups," said Ret. Adm. Thomas
Moorer, a former Joint Chiefs of Staff chairman who spent a year investigating
the attack as part of an independent panel he formed with other former military
officials. The panel also included a former U.S. ambassador to Saudi Arabia,
James Akins.


"Why would our government put Israel's interests ahead of our own?" Moorer
asked from his wheelchair at the news conference. He was chief of naval
operations at the time of the attack.


Moorer, who has long held that the attack was a deliberate act, wants Congress
to investigate.


Israeli Embassy spokesman Mark Regev disputed any notion that Israel knowingly
went after American sailors.


"I can say unequivocally that the Liberty tragedy was a terrible accident, that
the Israeli pilots involved believed they were attacking an enemy ship," Regev
said. "This was in the middle of a war. This is something that we are not proud
of."


Calls to the Navy seeking comment were not immediately returned.


In Boston's statement, he does not say why Johnson would have ordered a cover-
up. Attempts were made to reach Boston at his home in Coronado, Calif., but he
did not return calls seeking comment.


Moorer's panel suggested several possible reasons Israel might have wanted to
attack a U.S. ship. Among them: Israel intended to sink the ship and blame
Egypt because it might have brought the United States into the 1967 war.


___







USS Liberty Memorial Web site: www.ussliberty.org

[werw]

Przy takich właśnie okazjach widać nawyraźniej, kim naprawdę jest "Fredzio".
Ciężko w ogóle okolwiek powiedzieć.

[Gość: Wuj Ingmar]

Fredzio to chyba jednak prowokator.

[Gość: a]

pojawia sie mediach USA

[Gość: Wuj Ingmar]

Ciekawe, czy na polityczne zamowienie...

[Gość: A]

koalucja antybushowska rosnie i wojna sie poteguje midzy tymi obozami.
Kennedy, telewizja publiczna, demokraci, george Soros. Oczywiscie kazdy ma na
mysli swoje interesy. Yahoo jest wielka korporacja - popatrz sie na dzisiejszy
spis tresci - wszystkie maja charakter krytyczny wobec Busha, moze
Izraela, ..... Teraz czas na Busha, bedzie pewnie pobrzekiwac zamiast szabelka
to Home Patriot Act. Nabierz sil w plucach! Bedzie goraco.

korytarze władzy

[Gość: Wuj Ingmar]

Niekoniecznie antybushowska. Zauważ, że spotkanie w Akabie (i "road map") Bush
mógł słusznie uważać za sukces. A Sharon to sabotuje. Jeszcze nie ma mowy o
wytaczaniu armat (i, na przykład, potępienia sojusznika w Radzie Bezpieczeństwa
ONZ), ale można przeciez naciskać subtelniej.

Moją teorię potwierdza jeszcze jedno: otóż wpływ proizraelskich
neokonserwatystów na działania administracji wydaje się być celowo, choc
powoli, ograniczany (na korzzyśc Departamentu Stanu). Przykłady - wywalenie,
już jakiś czas temu, pana Perle, niedawna wściekłość Rumsfelda, który o
ustaleniach w sprawie odbudowy Iraku dowiedział się z prasy. Oczywiście, mogę
się też mylić, bo przecież w Owalnym Gabinecie nie przesiaduję. :-)

FoxNews o sprawie. Ciekawe!!!

[Gość: Wuj Ingmar]

www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,100960,00.html

Ciekawa dyskusja na amis forum

[Gość: A.D.]

Gość portalu: Wuj Ingmar napisał(a):

> "Przyjaciele" Ameryki będą się gniewać, że im nie zapomniano morderstwa.
>
> story.news.yahoo.com/news?
> tmpl=story&u=/ap/20031023/ap_on_go_ot/spy_ship_israel_4
> www.news.scotsman.com/latest.cfm?id=2085810
>
> "WASHINGTON - A former Navy attorney who helped lead the military
> investigation of the 1967 Israeli attack on the USS Liberty that killed 34
> American servicemen says former President Lyndon Johnson and his defense
> secretary, Robert McNamara, ordered that the inquiry conclude the incident
> was an accident.
>
> In a signed affidavit released at a Capitol Hill news conference, retired
> Capt. Ward Boston said Johnson and McNamara told those heading the Navy's
> inquiry to "conclude that the attack was a case of 'mistaken identity'
> despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary."
>
>

>>www.libertyforum.org/showflat.php?Cat=&Board=news_news&Number=975086&t=-1

[Gość: a]

Teraz Bush zbiera pieniadze na tak zwana odbudowe Iraku. Najpierw zniszczy cala
infrastruktere tego kraju, teraz swiat ma zaplacic za odbudowe. W miedzyczasie
partyzantka iracka znisczy cokolwiek bedzie odbudowane. Sjoinzm zagmatwal
pozycje Ameryki i Europy do tego stopnia ze jedynym wyjsciem bedzie poprostu
wysadzic to wszystko w powietrze. Apokalipsa wydaje sie nieunikniona, a pozycja
Izraela jest poprostu koszmarna. Najdziwniejsze ze zydzi tego nie widza i dalej
realizuja programy sjonizmu.

USS Liberty, czym smierdzi i SRA el

[Gość: USS]

te sprzedawczyki utopili by "najlepszego" przyjaciela w lyzce wody zeby swoj
cel osiagnac. wypuscili US w takie maliny ze jankesi sie przez ruskie lata nie
polapia

[Gość: A.D.]

www.counterpunch.org/stclair1126.html
Rockets, Napalm, Torpedoes & Lies
Israel's Attack on the Liberty, Revisited
by JEFFREY ST. CLAIR

[This is an excerpt from CounterPunch's hot new book, The Politics of Anti-
Semitism, just released by AK Press.]

>> Detale ataku, przyczyny i wnikliwe ujecie klamstw dotyczacych izraelskiej
zbrodni przeciwko Ameryce.

Sprawa USS 'Liberty' wraca! Nieco pikantna...

[Gość: A.D.]

>> W swietle ponizszej opinii, kwestia bushowsko-zydowskiego spisku 9/11
wyglada baaaardzo prawdopodobnie...


www.rense.com/general43/usop.htm

USS Liberty Attack Was
US Operation
From J B Campbell
[e-mail]
10-25-3

Of course, the attack on the USS Liberty was deliberate. The point is that the
attack was designed by Johnson and his Zionist handlers. The Liberty was sent
to Gaza to be sunk. This is even hinted in Ennis' book, Assault on the
Liberty. Ennis kicked me off the USS Liberty forum in 1997 for pointing this
out.

Who can doubt this after learning of not only the cover-up but the actions of
Johnson during the attack? He was quoted by a UPI reporter in the war room as
saying, "I'd rather they sink the goddamned thing than go against our
friends."

The Liberty was deliberately placed in the hot war zone with no protection so
that she could be sunk quietly with no witnesses and the massacre blamed on
the Egyptians, who could then be attacked not only by Israel but by the US on
behalf of Israel.

Israel would have had the green light to attack in all directions with the
full support of an enraged American people. If the Liberty had been sunk we
can bet the Zionist propaganda mills would have exploded with the news of
Egyptian treachery. But when the combined efforts of the Israeli air force and
navy failed to sink this unarmed tub, the mills were silent, the atrocity was
classified and the Liberty's personnel threatened with prison for talking
about the attack.

A cover-up of this magnitude was meant to protect the treacherous American
Zionists who planned this war crime - not so much the Israeli butchers.

How could Johnson's orders to allow the ship to be sunk possibly be justified
in an investigation? Ordering jet fighters recalled twice while the attack was
ongoing? Johnson and McNamara could have been hanged for treason. It's not too
late for McNamara.

People, especially the Liberty survivors, do not understand the catastrophic
setback for Israel that this botched massacre represented. If the American
people could have been told that Egypt sank the Liberty, Eretz (Greater)
Israel would have been a reality by 1970. That was the whole idea behind
sending the USS Liberty to her fate off Gaza. Zionist rule would have
stretched from the Nile to the Euphrates with the full support of the
bamboozled American public.

Is there a statute of limitations for treason?

J. B. Campbell

____

From Prof. Sam Hamod
[e-mail]
1-25-3

Dear friends,

Another thing that will bolster JB Campbell's position on President Johnson,
that he knew of this and let it happen, or even wanted the ship sunk (which I
doubt, but even that is possible) is:

1. Nasser wanted to attack israel, but Johnson called him and told him that
he'd keep Israel from attacking. Nasser had all of his planes lined up on
runways ready to go; his tanks, also. Unfortunately, for history, and for the
sake of America and the Arab world and world history, Nasser listened to
Johnson and trusted him.

2. The Israelis then attacked shortly after the phone call after Nasser had
his people stand down; it was a turkey shoot with the Egyptian military almost
entirely destroyed on every front.

3. The USS Liberty would have radioed this information and it would have
obligated the Amerians to intervene - but with the ship out of the way, there
was no intelligence coming in to the military.

4. Also, someone at the hghest order of command, namely the President,
countermanded the military men and called the US planes back that were to go
help the Liberty while it was under attack.

I had always admired johnson for his social concerns as a senator and as
President, but his behavior in this matter and his behavior in the Viet Nam
War show that he was completely in the hands of the military industrial
complex and the Zionists.

Sadly,

Prof. Sam Hamod

[maniekxxx]

www.rense.com/general43/usop.htm