Dodaj do ulubionych

WHAT IS THE POINT, NAT?

IP: *.sympatico.ca 09.10.02, 16:57
You're bang on, nat. Originally, I wanted to answer you right away. Then, I
decided to recess for 24 hrs to see what else would creep out from the
woodwork. Now you see. Surprised? Nitsche wouldn't be, either.
I liked your sagacious approach to the ever so depressing state of affairs on
this forum. Having said that, I can't help but throw this tacky ball back at
you: what is the point of your making this kind of observation? C'mon, we're
a part of this sorry pack as well, aren't we? You've been roaming around this
joint for two weeks, and I've been inhaling the brain-paralyzing venom for a
week now. Of course, most exchanges are nothing but an erratic cruising in
circles, bordering on "silly" category. Of course, most of our adversaries
act like self-indulging buffoons who think that the cranium-rectum inversion
is a psychological term for self-analysis, not a sympathetic description of
their moral stance. And? And I bet we'll be coming back for more again, and
again. Why? Because it happens to be our brain candy, our freak show, and
everybody likes freak shows. This is the bottomless well we can fetch from in
profusion.
Have you ever found the answer to the age-old question: Why do dogs lick
their privates? I have, I suppose. Because they can! That, pretty much,
explains the multitude of air-headed comments on any public forum, not only
this one. People can show off their wares, so they do. In most cases, you are
dealing with a bunch of people without real issues, without real passions,
and without any sense for real human condition. They do not want anyone to
disrupt their little worlds. That's why they love to dig themselves into
those trivial arguments about spelling, relationships and who's nice and
who's not. Everybody wants to go to heaven, but nobody wants to die. It's a
lose-lose situation. Did you realy think that anyone would care what's
bugging you? To them, you are the grumpy freak.
It begs the rhethorical question: "Can't we all just get along?" (Rodney
King). Can't we just try to develop a bit thicker skin? Thicker skin would be
beneficial to the state of our internal organs, heart and brain included.
Can't we all just adopt practically Hegelian dialectics? Hegelian dialectics
would be both challenging and rewarding. Can't we all just shove off the nit-
picking spelling attacks for a day or two? A typo here and there, like crap,
simply happens. (By the way, I know Rodney could've used a better grammar)
Sorry, I got carried away emotionally.
It's your turn, bro: what do you know, what do you say?
PS.1. Even with the most progressive laws against animal cruelty, an ass in
North America is a full value. Sorry.
2. To those who disagree: BITE ME!
3. To those who agree: KISS MY ASS!
4. Keep it real
Obserwuj wątek
    • Gość: Wojtek Re: WHAT IS THE POINT, NAT? IP: *.abo.wanadoo.fr 09.10.02, 17:12

      The Point is not to die anonymously
      • Gość: nat Re: WHAT IS THE POINT, NAT? IP: *.in-addr.btopenworld.com 09.10.02, 21:51
        Gość portalu: Wojtek napisał(a):

        >
        > The Point is not to die anonymously

        Not as silly as it might seem. Good point.
    • Gość: erwas Re: WHAT IS THE POINT, NAT? IP: 12.96.204.* 09.10.02, 18:44
      Dr.,
      living on pedestals is exciting. we below get neck pains and suffer flutters as
      you threaten to topple with each phrase that you utter, but of course that
      pales with what you are experiencing.
      good job Dr.! you are truly the Martha Steward pedestal lifestyles.

      erwas
      • Gość: Dr. Shrink Re: WHAT IS THE POINT, NAT? IP: *.sympatico.ca 09.10.02, 21:02
        Thaks Erwas, my good man. I see you've gotten most of that. Undaubtfully,
        you've been catching up with the rest, slowly but surely. I see a bright future
        for you: keep up good work!
        • Gość: erwas thank you, Doctor IP: 12.96.204.* 09.10.02, 23:12
          thank you.
          thank you for shrinking away and talking down to me. the area atop a pedestal
          is very small so any type of violent posturing on your part should be much
          admired.
          my neck still aches; still, that is nothing compared with the searing spasms
          running through your rectal area (ass, arse, ars, asse) for which other members
          (so to speak) of this forum (not you - they) are responsible.

          erwas.

          • Gość: mishy behind IP: webcacheH* / *.elephant.dialup.pol.co.uk 10.10.02, 00:47
            wow! charming to the bottom, less the cellulite....well behind I am with all
            of that but, thank you, all, you're entertaining!
            Where is the substance?
            • Gość: erwas Re: behind IP: 12.96.204.* 10.10.02, 05:22
              Gość portalu: mishy napisał(a):

              > wow! charming to the bottom, less the cellulite....well behind I am with all
              > of that but, thank you, all, you're entertaining!
              > Where is the substance?

              substance?

              this is a free-form forum.
              substance might arise incidentally as a by-product, but it will be without any
              intended purpose.

              erwas
              • Gość: mishy shrink contortionist? IP: webcacheH* / *.elephant.dialup.pol.co.uk 10.10.02, 16:00
                Given the sheer volume of the grey matter that must have produced all the
                above that could have been a painful butt -cracking experience!
                Have you everted yet?
                Feeling sore?
                Closer to the "sacrum"?
                No, not the capital "S" one...
                ...there you go...I'm starting to sound like one of the deeply embedded
                home-grown philosophers..
                Lighten up!
              • Gość: mishy shrink contortionist? IP: webcacheH* / *.elephant.dialup.pol.co.uk 10.10.02, 16:01
                Given the sheer volume of the grey matter that must have produced all the
                above, that could have been a painful butt -cracking experience!
                Have you everted yet?
                Feeling sore?
                Closer to the "sacrum"?
                No, not the capital "S" one...
                ...there you go...I'm starting to sound like one of the deeply embedded
                home-grown philosophers myself...
                Lighten up!
              • Gość: mishy shrink contortionist? IP: webcacheH* / *.elephant.dialup.pol.co.uk 10.10.02, 16:04
                Given the sheer volume of the grey matter that must have produced all the
                above, that could have been a painful butt -cracking experience!
                Have you everted yet?
                Feeling sore?
                Closer to the "sacrum"?
                No, not the capital "S" one...
                ...there you go...I'm starting to sound like one of the deeply embedded
                home-grown philosophers myself...
                Lighten up!
                Have a mars bar and a coke, too bloody spiritual!
              • Gość: mishy shrink contortionist? IP: webcacheH* / *.elephant.dialup.pol.co.uk 10.10.02, 16:06
                Given the sheer volume of the grey matter that must have produced all the
                above, that could have been a painful butt -cracking experience!
                Have you everted yet?
                Feeling sore?
                Closer to the "sacrum"?
                No, not the capital "S" one...
                ...there you go...I'm starting to sound like one of the deeply embedded
                home-grown philosophers myself...
                Lighten up!
                Have a mars bar and a coke, too bloody spiritual!
                • Gość: erwas Re: shrink contortionist? IP: 12.96.204.* 10.10.02, 16:32
                  Gość portalu: mishy napisał(a):

                  > Given the sheer volume of the grey matter that must have produced all the
                  > above, that could have been a painful butt -cracking experience!
                  > Have you everted yet?
                  > Feeling sore?
                  > Closer to the "sacrum"?
                  > No, not the capital "S" one...
                  > ...there you go...I'm starting to sound like one of the deeply embedded
                  > home-grown philosophers myself...
                  > Lighten up!
                  > Have a mars bar and a coke, too bloody spiritual!

                  oh, do be nice to the Dr.
                  I sit at his feet in awe, for I too would like to write learned reams without
                  content*, and he is a master. his true content is a shadowy sub-layer, a faint
                  echo of meaning teasing us with its other-worldly gravitas.
                  erwas.
                  * but I am getting there.
                  • Gość: sisi Re: shrink contortionist? IP: *.bydgoszcz.cvx.ppp.tpnet.pl 11.10.02, 22:52
                    Erwas, I don't think it was that awesome, but you spoke my mind with one thing:
                    the `learned reams without content`. That was it. In this sense, Dr and the
                    Patient share their problem ;-))
                    As it is often the case, people like to substitute the lack of content with
                    abundance of 'learned' or unfrequent vocabulary. The less substance the more
                    word art.
                    To be on the clear side, this is not a personal trip. Rather a sort of
                    generalization.
            • Gość: Bert Re: behind IP: *.214.80.139.Dial1.Boston1.Level3.net 10.10.02, 06:18
              Actually it is falling. Just look at it go from high up
              there all the way down to the floor and make a splash all
              over. Phew! Into hiding everyone! Even Hegel (where has
              he sprung from?) yells: "Offend and antagonize first,
              thence synthesize! No, not like that! Too soon! Duck!
              Duck, people, duck!"
            • Gość: Bert Re: behind IP: *.214.73.99.Dial1.Boston1.Level3.net 13.10.02, 11:14
              Armed with chromatographs, sniffing dogs, and nasal spray
              and supported by troops, inspectors trained in
              organoleptic forensics decided to declare this forum the
              "No-Fart" zone to be enforced by Poland, the United
              States and United Kingdom, Reuter reports this long weekend.

              Declaring crap "an open and arrogant affront to civilized
              values", George W. Bush and Tony Blair demanded that the
              participants cease their flagrant issuance of intestinal
              refuse immediately or "face the righteous wrath of the
              coalition and its armed forces".

              Anxious men and women gathered on thread corners,
              nervously aware that even an inadvertent eruption of
              their gastrointestinal tracts could trigger an immediate
              and overwhelming response.

              In the meantime, special forces cracked down on a group
              of known militants that the spec-op commander described
              as "threateningly noisome". Colonel E. Write dismissed
              claims that the offensive odor could be traced to other
              sources, saying "I know what I smelled, and it smelled
              like...non-substance".

              Meanwhile, the terrorists continued its battle for the
              hearts and minds of those involved with airdrops of baked
              beans, onion dip, and special kosher non-pork versions of
              Polish sausage dubbed "The Kielbasa Cannon".
              • Gość: mishy HELP! IP: webcacheH* / *.chimpanzee.dialup.pol.co.uk 13.10.02, 15:49
                www.polskishop.com/25_09_02/toiletflesh.gif
                • Gość: HELP! HELP! IP: webcacheH* / *.chimpanzee.dialup.pol.co.uk 13.10.02, 15:58
                  <a href =img src=
                  "http://www.polskishop.com/25_09_02/toiletflesh.gif"</a>

                  I wonder if the GW's ftp allows the code above to bring some visual
                  stimulants to this conversation?
    • Gość: Nat Re: reply to DR SHRINK IP: *.in-addr.btopenworld.com 10.10.02, 13:55
      Dear Dr,I thought I sent my reply last night but it seems some
      software/hardware problem interfered. Highly amused by your thoughts, and not
      all intimidated by your sizeable intellcet, I haste to to submit my reaction.
      Thanks for your comprehensive review of my mail and psyche. Indeeed, I am far
      from surprised with what crept out of the woodwork - some insignificant, time
      forgotten vermin and clouds of dust which is bound to settle. Minds wide open?
      Perhaps not.
      My objective was to liven up the procedures and take the discussion, if only
      temprarily, away from the intricacies of definite or otherwise articles, dairy
      produce and some purely academic linguistic deliberations that no English
      speaker would ever lose sleep over. It was getting tedious and leading nowhere
      except a salon for feeble-ego-massage. Remember Pavlov? Sound of a bell &
      elicit salivation? Any sign of contraversy interpreted as attack on one's back
      yard met with lavish abuse from mediocrity in the name of self defence.
      Conditioned reflex at its best.
      I have no quarrel with anyone out there and find it rather amusing to have
      become a subject of attack by a sad airhead, (it seems), unable to accept or at
      least tolerate diversity of opinions. Such 'small town' attitude has been the
      making of many a great comedy, so enough said.
      Should I carry a tag of a grumpy freak I would find it quite an appealing image
      if it were to fire up mental activity and keep the grey matter thriving.
      Skin condition? It's fine, thank you. Thickened by life's experiences, free of
      acne and cellulite; somewhere in between, and still capable of radiating joys
      of free spirit (as opposed to loose cannon).

      Hegelian dialectics not my forte so will let you off on that one - know when to
      admit defeat. And Rodney - sadly an unknown quantity too, therefore can't
      comment. Not a subscriber to Nietzeche's uberman/herd thesis though fully
      appreciate the attraction. You must know that his writings were deemed obscure
      by some, yet open to diverse interpretations by others? Before the Pointless
      Attack Brigade jumps in, let me clarify- I'm not making comparisons here. But
      it does ring a bell.
      I am nevertheless impressed with your awsome knowledge and wicked command of
      English language. Just please don't get emotional, stay hard (sic) and evolve
      your stern logic to the benefit of many.
      Bye for now.
Inne wątki na temat:

Nie masz jeszcze konta? Zarejestruj się


Nakarm Pajacyka