Dodaj do ulubionych

Koniec tej gry z osadnictwem

10.03.05, 09:18

Ten artykul z dziesiej izraelskiej gazyty Haaretz


The game is up



The report on the outposts that Prime Minister Ariel Sharon requisitioned
from attorney Talia Sasson reveals what was known by all, including Sharon,
about the round-about way in which state funds make their way to the
settlements with the help of ministers and officials working on behalf of the
settlers' lobby. For years, it was difficult to pinpoint the exact clauses in
the budget that facilitate the prosperity of the settlements and their
expansion into what are known as "the illegal outposts." Publicly, ministers
voiced discontent with their existence; behind the scenes, however, their
ministries continued to allocate infrastructure, money, structures and
soldiers to facilitate their hold on the land.




The outposts were, from the very beginning, an illusory plan designed to
maintain the settlement drive in the territories without declaring this in
public. The concept, "outpost," just like the term, "stronghold," which was
used in the 1970s, was intended to create the impression that the settlement
in question was a temporary one of a security nature. The true intention was
always to create a settlement continuum that would prevent the possibility of
establishing a Palestinian state.

If there is one thing that the Sasson report teaches us more than anything,
it is the fact that the game is up, and the era of settlement establishment
has finally come to an end. The reason for this is that the principal patron
of the settlement movement became prime minister, and began taking world
public opinion into consideration.

Sharon requisitioned the report on the outposts not to learn something he
hadn't known before, but to minimize the damage and in an effort to divert
discussion away from the fate of the settlements in general and onto the
outposts only. But, apparently, this too won't do any good. The insistent
demand from Washington to afford the Palestinian state to be established
with "territorial contiguity" that will not be hampered by settlements,
coupled with the fact that George Bush and Condoleezza Rice make sure of
mentioning this expression at every opportunity, will lead in the end to the
evacuation of all the settlements that get in the way of acceptable
contiguity.

In all likelihood, the State of Israel's eastern border will be a lot closer
to the Green Line than it believes. The difference between the
terms, "settlement" and "outpost," will turn out to be a myth, relating more
to the internal dialogue of self-deception that has been going on in Israel
for years. The map of the final peace deal with the Palestinians is not tied
to this misleading terminology. An outpost is a settlement in the making. The
outposts are all the settlements established since Israel undertook not to
establish more settlements.

The Sasson report should be treated, first and foremost, as study material
that could help government ministries find the loopholes through which money
is channeled by officials to places that deviate from the ministries'
policies. If the report raises criminal suspicions with regard to civil
servants who abused their positions, these individuals should be indicted so
that others won't be swayed to appease the politicians at the expense of the
public in the future. Indictments will presumably lead to the exposure of the
deception in its entirety - something the left has been warning about for
years.

More so than anything, the Sasson report should be seen as the beginning of a
new era. The timing of the evacuation of the outposts - before or after the
disengagement - pertains primarily to the operational ability of the police
and army to deal with their evacuation now, and is not the main issue.
Obserwuj wątek

Nie masz jeszcze konta? Zarejestruj się


Nakarm Pajacyka