Bush Administration's 2 years by Sen. Byrd

[Gość: chickenShorts]

"To contemplate war is to think about the most horrible of human experiences.
On this February day, as this nation stands at the brink of battle, every
American on some level must be contemplating the horrors of war.

"Yet, this Chamber is, for the most part, silent

[Gość: chickenShorts]

cont.

"Calling heads of state pygmies, labeling whole countries as evil, denigrating
powerful European allies as irrelevant

[Gość: wacko jacko]

Senator Byrd from West Virginia, self proclaimed expert on rules and
unqustionable king of pork.
Nice try but you don't know anything about american politics and nothing about
Byrd. Calling him sane is like calling Strom Thurmond young and Trent Lott
smart. Please don't take Byrd's remarks too seriously. They were made during
filibuster and it took more than an hour to complete. A filibuster is a game
for time. I did explained it to you, didn't I?
To illustrate the meaning of political speach I'll bring to your attention
today's remarks by Sen. Edwards. He just called present economical situation
"a Bush recession". The fact that recession started under Clinton and is over
now does not matter to the senator. Speach was made in front of a trade union
audience. Frendly forum. All the comentators are dismissing it as a pure
politics on the way to a presidency.

Mr. Bush in your eyes is a stupid moron, installed in the White House by a
Supreme Court judge. With this kind of bias you are obviously unable and
unwilling to see his acomplishments. Some of them you simply can't understand.
Don't worry, you are not alone. The whole democratic party is in the same
situation. Being out of power they totally lost their focus. On top of it they
lost a monopoly on information. Thr news outfits are divided. They no longer
present one-sided view. Although Mr. Bush had nothing to do with it.

[perk]

Gość portalu: wacko jacko napisał(a):

> Senator Byrd from West Virginia, self proclaimed expert
on rules and
> unqustionable king of pork.

He has never been an "unqustionable" king of pork.

> Nice try but you don't know anything about american
politics and nothing about
> Byrd.

You know much less than nothing about the "american"
politics, not to mention Byrd.

>Calling him sane is like calling Strom Thurmond young
and Trent Lott
> smart.

And some 500 other congressional traitors and crooks.

>Please don't take Byrd's remarks too seriously. They
were made during
> filibuster and it took more than an hour to complete. A
filibuster is a game
> for time. I did explained it to you, didn't I?

You are not capable of explaining diddle, to say nothing
about filibustering. It is done for a purpose ant that is
a foreign word to you.


> To illustrate the meaning of political speach I'll
bring to your attention
> today's remarks by Sen. Edwards. He just called present
economical situation
> "a Bush recession". The fact that recession started
under Clinton and is over
> now does not matter to the senator. Speach was made in
front of a trade union
> audience. Frendly forum. All the comentators are
dismissing it as a pure
> politics on the way to a presidency.
>

What is "speach" (2x)? What is "frendly forum"? What are
all "comentators"? You are bubbling about the
hopelessness of those crooks, not about Byrd.
The recession in the US has been permanent since the
sixties.


> Mr. Bush in your eyes is a stupid moron, installed in
the White House by a
> Supreme Court judge.

No single Supreme Court Judge can do that, you fool.

>With this kind of bias you are obviously unable and
> unwilling to see his acomplishments. Some of them you
>simply can't understand.

You are a complete idiot if you can see any
"acomplishments". Name one "acomplishments".

> Don't worry, you are not alone. The whole democratic
party is in the same
> situation. Being out of power they totally lost their
focus. On top of it they
> lost a monopoly on information. Thr news outfits are
divided. They no longer
> present one-sided view. Although Mr. Bush had nothing
to do with it.

Who gives a rat's ass about your "democratic party"?
There is no "democratic party" in the US - Democrat's
Party, perhaps.
Popular media are whores, presstitutes of mainstream –
They all present a one-sided view in the
best fascist tradition. You are an idiot.
Benito Pubhair and his henchmen have everything to do
with it.

Just in case you didn't notice I am calling you an idiot,
a dumbbell, a crock. You are inside the crock, to avoid
any misunderstanding about the pot's content.

[Gość: wacko jacko]

Dear perk chill out, man. You gonna have a heart attack.
What are ant and presstitutes? "It is done for a purpose ant that is
a foreign word to you. Popular media are whores, presstitutes of mainstream."
It is obvious to me that you don't know shit. Your understanding of things is
based on emotions. There is no thought process involved. You know everything
better. As popular song goes " I can do enything better than you. No you
can't. Yes I can.....etc."
Let me just answer one of your idiotic comments. You've said that "No single
Supreme Court Judge can do that, you fool." You cannot be more wrong.
It was a split decision 5 to 4. If one justice voted the other way the recount
would continue. The justices don't seat at the table and announce their
decision. Each justice makes a decision in his chambers without consulting
with others. He writes it down on the piece of paper and gives it to the clerk.
I really like being called an idiot by mentally unstable person. Have you
visited your doc at Credmoore lately?
Chill pill is prescribed for you.
Sincerely Yours
Idiot

[Gość: salmotrutta]

Gość portalu: wacko jacko napisał(a):

> Senator Byrd from West Virginia, self proclaimed expert on rules and
> unqustionable king of pork.
> Nice try but you don't know anything about american politics and nothing about
> Byrd. Calling him sane is like calling Strom Thurmond young and Trent Lott
> smart. Please don't take Byrd's remarks too seriously. They were made during
> filibuster and it took more than an hour to complete. A filibuster is a game
> for time. I did explained it to you, didn't I?
> To illustrate the meaning of political speach I'll bring to your attention
> today's remarks by Sen. Edwards. He just called present economical situation
> "a Bush recession". The fact that recession started under Clinton and is over
> now does not matter to the senator. Speach was made in front of a trade union
> audience. Frendly forum. All the comentators are dismissing it as a pure
> politics on the way to a presidency.
>
> Mr. Bush in your eyes is a stupid moron, installed in the White House by a
> Supreme Court judge. With this kind of bias you are obviously unable and
> unwilling to see his acomplishments. Some of them you simply can't understand.
> Don't worry, you are not alone. The whole democratic party is in the same
> situation. Being out of power they totally lost their focus. On top of it they
> lost a monopoly on information. Thr news outfits are divided. They no longer
> present one-sided view. Although Mr. Bush had nothing to do with it.

...and what are these accomplishements?...other than flunking first English essay at Andover...skipping service in Vietnam...and fucking up every business he's ever started?...

[Gość: wacko jacko]

What are those accomplishments?
How about having a majority in both chambers? Done in midterm elections.
How about a tax cut despite democratic majority in Senat at the time of the
vote? How about neutralizing the opposition. Democrats are running on empty.

The former president skipped Vietnam too. On top of this he also skipped
National Guard. F*****g up every business? No, that wishful thinking on your
part. He's been quiet successful in business except for the time when crude
was $12 per barrell. At that time hundreds of small oil businesses in USA
faultered.
Anyway, you are entitled to your opinion however biased.

[Gość: salmotrutta]

Gość portalu: wacko jacko napisał(a):

> What are those accomplishments?
> How about having a majority in both chambers? Done in midterm elections.
> How about a tax cut despite democratic majority in Senat at the time of the
> vote? How about neutralizing the opposition. Democrats are running on empty.
>
> The former president skipped Vietnam too. On top of this he also skipped
> National Guard. F*****g up every business? No, that wishful thinking on your
> part. He's been quiet successful in business except for the time when crude
> was $12 per barrell. At that time hundreds of small oil businesses in USA
> faultered.
> Anyway, you are entitled to your opinion however biased.

...of course...the only babyBush more successful in business than Dubya is Neil...heard anything about Neil recently?...as for politics...well yeah...tax cuts and the rest of that garbage...wonder who will pay for these tax cuts?...Dubya must be a greatest economist of all times...cut taxes and increase spending...and pig farmers are making wings for their charges...

Byrd's talk gets authopsy.

[Gość: wacko jacko]

By Ronald Radosh

February 19, 2003

[Gość: chickenShorts]

As a Foreword!

"Drivel" = '2) : to talk stupidly and carelessly...'

Who is Whacky's authority?

"ronald radosh" - 9 grants For a total of $423,076

For what? you may ask... Well, Dr ChickenShorts checked it for you, my
friends! Mostly for reconsidering... wait for it!... RECONSIDERING F******
MCARTHY!... Here:
1-1-2000 25,000 Ronald Radosh
Institute for Communitarian Studies
During the period September-December 2000 to continue preparation of a book,
THE MCCARTHY ERA RECONSIDERED. George Washington University Earhart Foundation
1-1-1999 25,000 The Center for Communitarian Policy Studies
Ronald Radosh
During the academic year 1999-2000 to continue preparation of a book, THE
MCCARTHY ERA RECONSIDERED. (Amended 12 July 1999, time period July - December
1999.) George Washington University Earhart Foundation
1-1-1998 50,000 Institute for Communitarian Studies
A John M. Olin Fellowship for Ronald Radosh
George Washington University John M. Olin Foundation, Inc.
1-1-1997 127,575 Institute for Communitarian Studies.
A John M. Olin Fellowship for Dr. Ronald Radosh George Washington University
John M. Olin Foundation, Inc.
1-1-1997 50,000 Institute for Communitarian Studies.
A John M. Olin Fellowship for Dr. Ronald Radosh George Washington University
John M. Olin Foundation, Inc.
1-1-1996 60,000 A research fellowship for Ronald Radosh Hudson Institute, Inc.
John M. Olin Foundation, Inc.
8-1-1989 45,500 To support Ronald Radosh's study of the history of the
Democratic Party. Queensborough Community College The Lynde and Harry Bradley
Foundation, Inc.
4-1-1986 15,000 Support research of Dr. Harvey Klehr & Ronald Radosh for book
about the Amerasia case. Emory University The Lynde and Harry Bradley
Foundation, Inc.


Apart from taking grants for reconsidering McCarthy, Radosh, a neo-
conservative, also writes for a certain Front Page...

Anyway, our 'friend' Whacky, a self-styled American Fireman or,simply, a
Freeper, calls this DRIVEL an 'authopsy'!...


In typical Freepers' tradition, no real argument with facts and figures, no
contrarguments to Byrd's arguments... instead, comparison to a situation over 60
years ago...& inevitably, Hitler!
(Well, Whacky if Saddam is Hitler then that's your doing in'it?)

"... What President Bush wants, Byrd argues, is to "attack a nation that
is not imminently threatening" but may be sometime in the future. An attack on
Iraq would be completely "unprovoked" and is completely "not necessary at this
time." Moral pressure alone is having what he calls a "good result in Iraq."

Similarly, Taft told the Senate that Hitler and the Nazis were not a threat to
the United States. (Acknowledging that Hitler might well defeat Britain and
rule Europe by "ruthless force," Taft still felt that such an "alternative
seems preferable to present participation in a European war.")


Whacky, we've been bumping into each other on this Forum for about four months
now. All I can say is that you've learnt nothing! Zilch! You are a Freeper
Zombie!

[Gość: wacko jacko]

chickenshorts napisal: " Apart from taking grants for reconsidering McCarthy,
Radosh, a neo-conservative, also writes for a certain Front Page..."

Joe McCarthy was a good democrat until he became a bad democrat. Had deep and
close ties to Kennedy family, especially to Robert Kennedy. Here we have an
association. Kennedys are bad. They stand on a certain side.....

Senator Robert Byrd, a southern segregationist, member of the Ku Klux Klan.
Guilty by association. Today he is a champion of the peaceniks and those who
still fight against racism.

With the rest of your post I respectfully disgree. You are entitled to your
beliefs as I am entitled to mine.
In your world, the people who you agree with are smart. Those who you disagre
with, are simply stupid morons, neo-conservative garbage or some reactionary
right-wingers.