7 klamstw o Iraku

[Gość: Utley]

JON BASIL UTLEY: THE SEVEN BIG LIES ABOUT IRAQ

ONE –It’s Saddam’s fault that half a million children died since the economic
blockade, Saddam could feed his people if he cared instead of using his money
to buy weapons – "More than one million Iraqis have died- 500,000 of them
children-as a direct consequence of economic sanctions... As many as 12% of the
children surveyed in Baghdad are wasted, 28% stunted and 29% underweight." – UN
FAO, December 1995.
ANSWER – Nearly all oil sales money has been allocated through United Nations
inspectors, subject to nearly 40% reduction for reparations and UN expenses,
and subject to Washington's veto and foot dragging – usually months for even
the simplest decision. Washington has allowed food and medicine imports, but
almost nothing else. For nearly ten years it blockaded chlorine to sanitize the
water and any equipment to rebuild the electricity grid, sanitation and
irrigation facilities. Even pencils for school children were prohibited. (A New
York Times editorial 2/11/01 reports, "currently American diplomats are holding
up billions of dollars of imports needed for civilian transportation, electric
power generation...and even medical treatment"). Finally the Europeans rebelled
at the cruelty and shamed Washington into allowing such imports, (New York
Times 12/6/00). Until oil prices increased last year, sales ran about $4
billion yearly minus about 35% withheld by UN left 2.6 billion divided by 20
million population = $130 per year per person = 36 cents per day per person for
food, medicine. Obviously Iraq needed to rebuild its agriculture and transport
infrastructure to feed itself, but this was prevented by Washington.
Washington blockaded supplies to rebuild Iraq's bombed oil production and
refining facilities since 10 years, although it went to war supposedly to
assure oil supplies for the world. Iraq is now also getting substantial monies
through sales of smuggled oil, especially since the price of oil went up and
the rest of the world tires of the American blockade. No doubt some of this
goes for weapons purchases.
TWO – If Iraq allowed inspections for WMD (weapons of mass destruction),
Washington would remove the blockade. Iraq must prove that it has no WMD and
that it won't manufacture any in the future.
ANSWER – There's No Connection Between Inspections and Sanctions on Iraq and
consequently no incentive for Iraq to comply. Equally No Nation can "prove" a
negative, that it's not doing something. Biological and chemical weapons can be
made, "in a large closet which is all the space you need to mix deadly chemical
weapons...... Chemical and biological weapons are the great equalizers against
our atomic weapons." (Time "Everyman a Superpower," 11/24/97).
Re inspections, Reuters reported, 12/13/99, – "The (European) aim was to
prevent the United States and Britain from imposing arms requirements that Iraq
could not meet and thus keeping the sanctions in place for years to come." And
AFP 12/13/99, "French diplomats retorted that by insisting on full cooperation,
the council would give the United States an excuse to refuse to suspend
sanctions on the flimsiest grounds." Madeleine Albright declared in 1997: "We
do not agree with the nations who argue that if Iraq complies with its
obligations concerning weapons of mass destruction, sanctions should be
lifted." Clinton went one step further when he said, "sanctions will be there
until the end of time, or as long as he [Saddam] lasts." The Bush
Administration has not repudiated these statements
Scott Ritter, former head of the U.N. arms inspection team in Iraq, on the NBC
Today Show, 12/17/98, explained, "Washington perverted the U.N. weapons process
by using it as a tool to justify military actions, falsely so. ... The U.S. was
using the inspection process as a trigger for war."
THREE – Iraq wouldn't let the UN/US monitors inspect possible wmd production or
storage sites. that's why America started bombing.
ANSWER – Iraq did so from 1991 until 1998, but Washington still wouldn’t take
off the trade blockade. Scott Ritter, the former UNSCOM inspector, told CNN on
2/18 "In terms of large-scale weapons of mass destruction programs, these had
been fundamentally destroyed or dismantled by the weapons inspectors as early
as 1996, so by 1998 we had under control the situation on the ground."
Then in 1998 Washington also demanded access to the Iraq's government personnel
files, the basis of the its power structure. Saddam saw that U.S. demands were
just always increased with no hope of sanctions being lifted.
FOUR – It's Iraq's fault that the blockade continues. America has nothing
against Iraq's people, only against its government.
ANSWER – Britain and Washington have introduced a "peace plan"demanding that
Iraq must allow inspections in return for nothing.
Russia and France have introduced a plan (vetoed by Washington) allowing for
immediate lifting of sanctions in return for continued, ongoing WMD
inspections. Washington has already often stated policy of no relief from
blockade no matter what Iraq does, as long as Saddam stays in power. This is
typical Washington policy (denounced by former Pres. Jimmy Carter) of demanding
rulers follow policies to get themselves killed or at least thrown out of power
(and then tried for "war crimes") and then starves the nations' civilians on
and on for years while nothing changes.
LATE NEWS, 3/7 – Secretary of State Powell implied in testimony to Congress
that America might now go along with this option.
FIVE – The United Nations ordered sanctions and Washington is just enforcing
them.
ANSWER – Most nations in the world want them lifted for non-military goods. It
is the U.S. veto that prevents lifting of the sanctions (UPI, 11/1/00) Imposed
in 1990 many nations argue that they were never intended to last for years and
are one of the most brutal sanction regimes in modern history. The crippling
trade embargo is incompatible with the UN charter as well as UN conventions on
human rights and the rights of the child (BBC News Online, 9/30/00).
Unilaterally attacking Iraq is totally unconstitutional and illegal under
United Nations Charter and Nuremberg Judgements.
SIX – If we don't bomb Iraq, Saddam will use his WMD against us or his
neighbors or Israel.
ANSWER – Saddam is rational. He had these weapons during the First Gulf War and
didn't because he feared our threats of consequences even when his nation was
being decimated. Israel has some 200 atomic bombs and can well defend itself.
It has already threatened Iraq with their use if Iraq attacks with WMD.
Meanwhile Washington arms all Iraq's neighbors (except Iran), and Turkey bombs
and invades Iraq at will.
SEVEN – Saddam gassed his own people.
ANSWER – Didn’t our government also do that at WACO? The C2 gas used by the FBI
killed children who couldn’t fit into gas masks and then created an explosive
mixture which triggered fire and immolation, (see super documentary, WACO,
nominated for an Academy Award). Remember how often Americans were lied to in
order to get us into wars. For the First World War, it was stories that German
soldiers ate Belgian babies. For the Iraq war it was lies about babies being
thrown out of incubators, "testified" to a Congressional Committee by
a "mystery" witness who later turned out to be the daughter of the Kuwaiti
sheik’s ruling family who is Ambassador in Washington. It was all lies. Then we
were told there were aerial photographs of the Iraqi Army massed on Saudi
Arabia’s border ready to attack. They were never released; they apparently were
lies too. How do we know we weren't a

[f.u]

BS!!!!

All Saddm has to do is to comply with the surrender agreement which he signed at
the end of the war.
He is the criminal who started the war in the first place. What is he really
hiding that is more important than well being of his own people?



Gość portalu: Utley napisał(a):

)
)
) JON BASIL UTLEY: THE SEVEN BIG LIES ABOUT IRAQ
)
) ONE –It’s Saddam’s fault that half a million children died si
) nce the economic
) blockade, Saddam could feed his people if he cared instead of using his money
) to buy weapons – "More than one million Iraqis have died- 500,000 of them
)
) children-as a direct consequence of economic sanctions... As many as 12% of the
)
) children surveyed in Baghdad are wasted, 28% stunted and 29% underweight." R
) 11; UN
) FAO, December 1995.
) ANSWER – Nearly all oil sales money has been allocated through United Nat
) ions
) inspectors, subject to nearly 40% reduction for reparations and UN expenses,
) and subject to Washington's veto and foot dragging – usually months for e
) ven
) the simplest decision. Washington has allowed food and medicine imports, but
) almost nothing else. For nearly ten years it blockaded chlorine to sanitize the
)
) water and any equipment to rebuild the electricity grid, sanitation and
) irrigation facilities. Even pencils for school children were prohibited. (A New
)
) York Times editorial 2/11/01 reports, "currently American diplomats are holding
)
) up billions of dollars of imports needed for civilian transportation, electric
) power generation...and even medical treatment"). Finally the Europeans rebelled
)
) at the cruelty and shamed Washington into allowing such imports, (New York
) Times 12/6/00). Until oil prices increased last year, sales ran about $4
) billion yearly minus about 35% withheld by UN left 2.6 billion divided by 20
) million population = $130 per year per person = 36 cents per day per person for
)
) food, medicine. Obviously Iraq needed to rebuild its agriculture and transport
) infrastructure to feed itself, but this was prevented by Washington.
) Washington blockaded supplies to rebuild Iraq's bombed oil production and
) refining facilities since 10 years, although it went to war supposedly to
) assure oil supplies for the world. Iraq is now also getting substantial monies
) through sales of smuggled oil, especially since the price of oil went up and
) the rest of the world tires of the American blockade. No doubt some of this
) goes for weapons purchases.
) TWO – If Iraq allowed inspections for WMD (weapons of mass destruction),
) Washington would remove the blockade. Iraq must prove that it has no WMD and
) that it won't manufacture any in the future.
) ANSWER – There's No Connection Between Inspections and Sanctions on Iraq
) and
) consequently no incentive for Iraq to comply. Equally No Nation can "prove" a
) negative, that it's not doing something. Biological and chemical weapons can be
)
) made, "in a large closet which is all the space you need to mix deadly chemical
)
) weapons...... Chemical and biological weapons are the great equalizers against
) our atomic weapons." (Time "Everyman a Superpower," 11/24/97).
) Re inspections, Reuters reported, 12/13/99, – "The (European) aim was to
) prevent the United States and Britain from imposing arms requirements that Iraq
)
) could not meet and thus keeping the sanctions in place for years to come." And
) AFP 12/13/99, "French diplomats retorted that by insisting on full cooperation,
)
) the council would give the United States an excuse to refuse to suspend
) sanctions on the flimsiest grounds." Madeleine Albright declared in 1997: "We
) do not agree with the nations who argue that if Iraq complies with its
) obligations concerning weapons of mass destruction, sanctions should be
) lifted." Clinton went one step further when he said, "sanctions will be there
) until the end of time, or as long as he [Saddam] lasts." The Bush
) Administration has not repudiated these statements
) Scott Ritter, former head of the U.N. arms inspection team in Iraq, on the NBC
) Today Show, 12/17/98, explained, "Washington perverted the U.N. weapons process
)
) by using it as a tool to justify military actions, falsely so. ... The U.S. was
)
) using the inspection process as a trigger for war."
) THREE – Iraq wouldn't let the UN/US monitors inspect possible wmd product
) ion or
) storage sites. that's why America started bombing.
) ANSWER – Iraq did so from 1991 until 1998, but Washington still wouldn
) 217;t take
) off the trade blockade. Scott Ritter, the former UNSCOM inspector, told CNN on
) 2/18 "In terms of large-scale weapons of mass destruction programs, these had
) been fundamentally destroyed or dismantled by the weapons inspectors as early
) as 1996, so by 1998 we had under control the situation on the ground."
) Then in 1998 Washington also demanded access to the Iraq's government personnel
)
) files, the basis of the its power structure. Saddam saw that U.S. demands were
) just always increased with no hope of sanctions being lifted.
) FOUR – It's Iraq's fault that the blockade continues. America has nothing
)
) against Iraq's people, only against its government.
) ANSWER – Britain and Washington have introduced a "peace plan"demanding t
) hat
) Iraq must allow inspections in return for nothing.
) Russia and France have introduced a plan (vetoed by Washington) allowing for
) immediate lifting of sanctions in return for continued, ongoing WMD
) inspections. Washington has already often stated policy of no relief from
) blockade no matter what Iraq does, as long as Saddam stays in power. This is
) typical Washington policy (denounced by former Pres. Jimmy Carter) of demanding
)
) rulers follow policies to get themselves killed or at least thrown out of power
)
) (and then tried for "war crimes") and then starves the nations' civilians on
) and on for years while nothing changes.
) LATE NEWS, 3/7 – Secretary of State Powell implied in testimony to Congre
) ss
) that America might now go along with this option.
) FIVE – The United Nations ordered sanctions and Washington is just enforc
) ing
) them.
) ANSWER – Most nations in the world want them lifted for non-military good
) s. It
) is the U.S. veto that prevents lifting of the sanctions (UPI, 11/1/00) Imposed
) in 1990 many nations argue that they were never intended to last for years and
) are one of the most brutal sanction regimes in modern history. The crippling
) trade embargo is incompatible with the UN charter as well as UN conventions on
) human rights and the rights of the child (BBC News Online, 9/30/00).
) Unilaterally attacking Iraq is totally unconstitutional and illegal under
) United Nations Charter and Nuremberg Judgements.
) SIX – If we don't bomb Iraq, Saddam will use his WMD against us or his
) neighbors or Israel.
) ANSWER – Saddam is rational. He had these weapons during the First Gulf W
) ar and
) didn't because he feared our threats of consequences even when his nation was
) being decimated. Israel has some 200 atomic bombs and can well defend itself.
) It has already threatened Iraq with their use if Iraq attacks with WMD.
) Meanwhile Washington arms all Iraq's neighbors (except Iran), and Turkey bombs
) and invades Iraq at will.
) SEVEN – Saddam gassed his own people.
) ANSWER – Didn’t our government also do that at WACO? The C2 gas use
) d by the FBI
) killed children who couldn’t fit into gas masks and then created an explo
) sive
) mixture which triggered fire and immolation, (see super documentary, WACO,
) nominated for an Academy Award). Remember how

[Gość: rev]

pisz do rzeczy, racje ma silniejszy, - Rzym upadl. Ameryka traci przyjaciol na
wszystkich kontynentach. Arabskie skorupowane kacyki to przyjaciele USA, w Azji
to samo, w Polsce podobnie...........................

[jot-23]

Gość portalu: rev napisał(a):

> pisz do rzeczy, racje ma silniejszy, - Rzym upadl. Ameryka traci przyjaciol na
> wszystkich kontynentach. Arabskie skorupowane kacyki to przyjaciele USA, w Azji
>
> to samo, w Polsce podobnie...........................


:))))) "pisz do rzeczy" i moment po tym tzw "stek bzdur"

Jescze jeden pierdolony zwolennik Sadama Arafata

[puls]

Jeszcze jeden piepszony zwolennik dyktatur ,o Polsce pisze ze rzadza
nia "kacyki" USA.
Co za bydle ,zapewne chce demokracje typu arabskiego ,moze Taliby ,Osama .
Pewnie jakies arabskie bydle ,nikt zdrowy psychicznie nie bedzie popieral
dyktatury bandytow.

[Gość: answer]

reprezentujecie sionistyczny rasizm i nic wspolnego z Polska i z Europa nie
macie, jestescie brudem tego Forum. Nie wam sadzic co to jest demokracja,
pochodzicie ze szkoly KGB, Bermana, Eichmana i Ariela.