Is it in order?

[al.1]

I've found the following sentence in a newspaper:

He's stole the show on last year's "I'm a Celeb" and is now a judge on
ITV1's "Joseph".

I don't know such a tense "has stole". Why not "stolen"?

I'm looking forward or even forwarder to experts' opinion in this question.
Quick, quick, quick.
As soon as possible, or possibly sooner ((!))

[barteks0]

It's AmE.

[paper_mate]

barteks0 napisał:

> It's AmE.

Co masz na mysli przez "AmE". Wyjasnij prosze.

[sosna28]

AmE means American English.

[paper_mate]

> AmE means American English.

I know that.

What I would like to know is what is the relationship between an obvious
grammatical error and the way americans speak english.

Did this sentence come from an american source?

[al.1]

paper_mate napisał:

> > AmE means American English.
>
> I know that.
>
> What I would like to know is what is the relationship between an obvious
> grammatical error and the way americans speak english.
>
> Did this sentence come from an american source?

No. It's from English newspaper. However my lamp started to glimmer on your
clue. It might be quotation of David Gest:

"This is David Gest. Don't be scared this isn't the bogeyman, it's only David
Gest. He's a nice man. He's stole the..."

Do dziwactw amerykanskich to by pasowalo.

Dzieki

[warmi2]

Nie wiem ... w USA to bylby wyrazny blad gramatyczny.

[ampolion]

"American sources" też popełniają literówki.

[ampolion]

No: it is media English. Tak jak i polski medialny.

[la_dolce_vita]

it's not AmE, media english or any other, it is simply craaapy proofreading

[mudzyn7]

amen to that!

[al.1]

la_dolce_vita napisała:

> it's not AmE, media english or any other, it is simply craaapy proofreading

Nie zgadzam sie. To co nas, Polakow razi, wcale nie oznacza, ze w takiej samej
pejoratywnej jaskrawosci odbieraja to anglosasi. Podobnie cudzoziemiec moglby
nam wytykac dlaczego slyszy sie powszechnie w II os. l.p. w odniesieniu do r.
m.: bedziesz szedl (zamiast isc), robil (zamiast robic) mowil (zamiast mowic) -
czyli forme wlasciwa III osobie l. p. Przyklad moze nie najtrafniejszy, ale
taki mi sie nasunal. Poza tym to co Polakow moze porazac, ktorym blizsza jest
angielszczyzna europejska, to z pozoru bledy w jezyku angielskim odmiany AE.
Podepre sie cytatem (z czego podam pozniej). Wedlug mnie w ponizszym cytacie
popelniono blad:
jest: "Americans tend to use adjectives instead of adverbs."
powinno byc: "Americans tend to use adverbs instead of adjectives."

"...
Adverbs
Americans tend to use adjectives instead of adverbs. Instead of «That’s really
good» you might hear them say «That’s real good» or instead of «I’m doing very
well» they say «I’m doing pretty good».

Here are some more examples:

British English ................ American English
He did that really quickly. ..... He did that real quick.
Let’s take things slowly. ....... Let’s take things slow.
Her car drives more quickly. .... Her car drives quicker.
..."

Zaczerpniete z:

www.english-test.net/articles/7/index.html

[al.1]

Sprostowanie. Jest tobrze (namieszalem z tym przyslowkami i przymiotnikami).

[mooth.o.the.tyne]

al.1 napisał:

> I've found the following sentence in a newspaper:
>
> He's stole the show on last year's "I'm a Celeb" and is now a judge on
> ITV1's "Joseph".
>
> I don't know such a tense "has stole". Why not "stolen"?

Tego nie wiem, ale w okolicach Newcastle, Gateshead, Sunderland itd często
można usłyszeć takie formy, jak he's stole, he's ate, he's went.