Sec. 9.42. DEADLY FORCE TO PROTECT PROPERTY. A person is justified
in using deadly force against another to protect land or tangible,
movable property:
(1) if he would be justified in using force against the other under
Section 9.41; and
(2) when and to the degree he reasonably believes the deadly force
is immediately necessary:
(A) to prevent the other's imminent commission of arson, burglary,
robbery, aggravated robbery, theft during the nighttime, or criminal
mischief during the nighttime; or
(B) to prevent the other who is fleeing immediately after committing
burglary, robbery, aggravated robbery, or theft during the nighttime
from escaping with the property; and
(3) he reasonably believes that:
(A) the land or property cannot be protected or recovered by any
other means; or
(B) the use of force other than deadly force to protect or recover
the land or property would expose the actor or another to a
substantial risk of death or serious bodily injury.
2(B) choc sprzeczne z zasada uzycia "tylko w koniecznej obronie" tez
mi sie podoba. Tak poganiac z giwera za zlodziejem po uspionych
dzielnicach miasteczek Texasu.
hard core
