Dodaj do ulubionych

Sprawa przeciwko W-u

IP: *.lv.lv.cox.net 09.08.04, 03:36
"Does anyone really favor an administration that so shamelessly lies? One
that so tenaciously clings to secrecy, not to protect the American people,
but to protect itself? That so willfully misrepresents its true aims and so
knowingly misleads the people from whom it derives its power? I simply cannot
think so.?"

Think again,... kilku takich mozna wymienic jednym tchem, niektorzy z nich
nawet twierdza ze mysla 'logiczne'

www.esquire.com/features/articles/2004/040729_mfe_reagan_1.html
Obserwuj wątek
    • Gość: West W-u's Ameryka i Ameryka Amerykanow IP: *.lv.lv.cox.net 09.08.04, 04:00
      "...chances are your America and George W. Bush's America are not the same
      place. If you are dead center on the earning scale in real-world twenty-first-
      century America, you make a bit less than $32,000 a year, and $32,000 is not a
      sum that Mr. Bush has ever associated with getting by in his world. Bush, who
      has always managed to fail upwards in his various careers, has never had a job
      the way you have a job—where not showing up one morning gets you fired, costing
      you your health benefits. He may find it difficult to relate personally to any
      of the nearly two million citizens who've lost their jobs under his
      administration, the first administration since Herbert Hoover's to post a net
      loss of jobs. Mr. Bush has never had to worry that he couldn't afford the best
      available health care for his children. For him, forty-three million people
      without health insurance may be no more than a politically inconvenient
      abstraction. When Mr. Bush talks about the economy, he is not talking about
      your economy. His economy is filled with pals called Kenny-boy who fly around
      in their own airplanes. In Bush's economy, his world, friends relocate offshore
      to avoid paying taxes. Taxes are for chumps like you. You are not a friend.
      You're the help. When the party Mr. Bush is hosting in his world ends, you'll
      be left picking shrimp toast out of the carpet..."

      www.esquire.com/features/articles/2004/040729_mfe_reagan_3.html
      • Gość: Miluś Zgadza się.... IP: *.249.132.70.Dial1.Washington2.Level3.net 09.08.04, 04:06
        Ameryka to już nie ten sam kraj, który znamy z filmów z lat 60-tych. W wielu
        dziedzinach ciągną się daleko za Europą. Nie mówię o potędze militarnej, która
        długo jeszcze nie będzie kwestionowana.
    • Gość: West ...dlatego pojechal na ryby! IP: *.lv.lv.cox.net 09.08.04, 04:02
      More serious by an order of magnitude was the administration's dishonesty
      concerning pre-9/11 terror warnings. As questions first arose about the
      country's lack of preparedness in the face of terrorist assault, Condoleezza
      Rice was dispatched to the pundit arenas to assure the nation that "no one
      could have imagined terrorists using aircraft as weapons." In fact, terrorism
      experts had warned repeatedly of just such a calamity. In June 2001, CIA
      director George Tenet sent Rice an intelligence report warning that "it is
      highly likely that a significant Al Qaeda attack is in the near future, within
      several weeks." Two intelligence briefings given to Bush in the summer of 2001
      specifically connected Al Qaeda to the imminent danger of hijacked planes being
      used as weapons. According to The New York Times, after the second of these
      briefings, titled "Bin Laden Determined to Attack Inside United States," was
      delivered to the president at his ranch in Crawford, Texas, in August,
      Bush "broke off from work early and spent most of the day fishing." This was
      the briefing Dr. Rice dismissed as "historical" in her testimony before the
      9/11 Commission.

      www.esquire.com/features/articles/2004/040729_mfe_reagan_4.html
      • Gość: West najwazniejszy jest wizerunek, pozanim moze byc nic IP: *.lv.lv.cox.net 09.08.04, 04:12
        "But image is everything in this White House, and the image of George Bush as a
        noble and infallible warrior in the service of his nation must be fanatically
        maintained, because behind the image lies . . . nothing?"

        www.esquire.com/features/articles/2004/040729_mfe_reagan_5.html
        • Gość: West na koniec do busho-entuzjastow i tym podobnym... IP: *.lv.lv.cox.net 09.08.04, 04:16
          Jesli przeczytacie slowa napisane przez Rona Reagana i po zastanowieniu sie nad
          tym co tam pisze nadal bedziecie piac dziekczynne piesni na czesc W-u,
          jestescie zwyklymi uposledzonymi biedakami, ktorych horyzonty myleniowe nie
          wybiegaja dalej jak to co pozostawiacie za soba idac pusta szara ulica we mgle.

          powodzenia

          ---

          www.esquire.com/features/articles/2004/040729_mfe_reagan_1.html
    • Gość: West Re: Sprawa przeciwko W-u IP: *.lv.lv.cox.net 09.08.04, 23:20
      dla przypomnienia

      www.esquire.com/features/articles/2004/040729_mfe_reagan_1.html
Inne wątki na temat:

Nie masz jeszcze konta? Zarejestruj się


Nakarm Pajacyka