Dodaj do ulubionych

Nieprzetłumaczalne (chyba) ...

IP: 213.25.168.* 14.05.04, 20:57
Zastanawialiście się kiedyś czy można przetłumaczyć na jęz. angielski
słowo "Rzeczpospolita" ???

Ciekawe czy dało by radę ?
Obserwuj wątek
    • jajo_z_kolcem Re: Nieprzetłumaczalne (chyba) ... 14.05.04, 21:57
      "Commonthing" po prostu:)
    • chris-joe Re: Nieprzetłumaczalne (chyba) ... 14.05.04, 22:04
      just like the Romans couldn't sleep at night wondering how would the future
      Poles translate "Res Publica" into their language... Which, by the way,
      translates -veeeeery roughly- into English...hmmm, let me think a little...
      could it be: Republic!? Nah...
      • Gość: wacko jacko Commonwealth n/t IP: *.nyc.rr.com 14.05.04, 22:41
        • chris-joe Re: Commonwealth n/t 14.05.04, 22:48
          "Commonwealth" is right when you mean "Rzeczpospolita Obojga Narodow", in case
          of "Rzeczpospolita Polska" it is "Republic".
    • jadefish um, republic? 14.05.04, 23:44
      • chickenshorts Re: um, republic? 14.05.04, 23:55
        Yep!

        Res ) rzecz + Public ) publiczna )) which of course it is in more than one
        sense...

        But then, there is hope... at least according to Timothy Garton Ash:

        Dizzy with success

        Timothy Garton Ash in Warsaw
        Thursday May 13, 2004

        I am writing this at a window looking out on to the large, grey expanse of
        Pilsudski Square, in central Warsaw. To the left is the Tomb of the Unknown
        Soldier, guarded by smartly uniformed Polish soldiers whose comrades are now
        serving in Iraq. To the right stands a statue of Marshal Pilsudski, the
        founding father of Polish independence after the first world war. In the
        distance, I can see the gables of the old town, reconstructed after Hitler's
        occupying troops had razed it to the ground, and hideous high-rise apartment
        blocks built during communist rule in the neighbourhood where the Nazis once
        created the Warsaw ghetto. Directly across the square from my hotel is a
        gleaming new office block designed by Norman Foster.
        Old Europe, new Europe. What has this square not seen since I first looked out
        on it 25 years ago? March-pasts for visiting Soviet viceroys. Illegal
        demonstrations for the Polish liberation movement Solidarity. Tanks and
        watercannon to reimpose communist rule. Blackmarket spivs, underground
        couriers, secret police narks. More demonstrations. Rejoicing at the end of
        communism. Welcomes to new friends, from François Mitterrand to George W Bush.
        Military ceremonies to mark Poland joining Nato. Schoolchildren singing
        Schiller's Ode to Joy, in Polish, to celebrate Poland's entry into the European
        Union on May 1.
        Twenty five years ago, Poland and Britain were in different worlds. Today, they
        are not just in the same market-dominated world, with a Norman Foster building
        that would be entirely at home on the south bank of the Thames; they are also
        full and equal partners in the same military alliance and the same political
        and economic community. That has never been true before; not in a thousand
        years. The Poles, with their spirit of resistance and tough persistence, have
        brought themselves to this success - with just a little help from their
        friends. Before worrying about today's new problems, it's worth reflecting for
        a moment on this incredible transformation - truly a miracle on the Vistula. To
        all those countries, from Belarus to Burma, whose politics currently seems as
        hopeless as did Poland's 25 years ago, Poland is a message of hope.
        Meanwhile, what does Poland's new position mean in practice? It means busloads
        of energetic young Poles making their way to Britain, and other parts of the
        EU, in search of work. (The newspapers here advertise courses to "Polish your
        English". Pun intended.) It means that on the Polish president's state visit to
        London last week, he and the British prime minister cut private deals about the
        EU constitution, the new European commission, the budget etc - you support me
        on this, I'll support you on that - like any other pair of horse-trading EU
        leaders. It means that when I turn on the Polish News 24 channel, I see the
        defence minister giving a press conference about "our" situation in Iraq. When
        he says "our allies", he means America and Britain. I notice that his
        vocabulary contains prefabricated phrases identical to those used in the
        Pentagon or the Ministry of Defence: "remnants of the former regime", "bands of
        international terrorists". Twenty five years ago, the prefabricated phrases
        came from Moscow. No, of course it's not the same, because Poland has freely
        chosen to mouth these phrases. But domestic coinage they are not.
        And what are today's big problems for our Polish ally? First of all, this dizzy
        external political success is accompanied by crippling internal political
        weakness. At the very moment of entering the EU, the country only has a
        provisional government, not yet confirmed by a parliamentary vote. It has no
        stable, strong, political parties. There has been endless factional infighting,
        pettiness and what looks like an alarming level of corruption. As a result,
        ordinary Poles are deeply disillusioned with politics. The turnout at the
        country's first European elections will probably be very low, and populists are
        gaining ground at an alarming pace. As in Italy, the economy seems to grow in
        spite of political chaos, but Italy is hardly a very encouraging example of
        mature democracy. I cannot avoid the conclusion that the country's whole
        political class has, thus far, failed it. There is a famous and very Polish
        saying of Marshal Pilsudski's: "To be victorious, and rest on your laurels,
        that is defeat; to be defeated, and not give up, that is victory." Today,
        Poland's politicians are not resting on the country's laurels but tearing them
        apart.
        In foreign policy, Poland is also in danger of losing its balance. Coming from
        such a starting point, it could turn anyone's head to be treated by Washington
        as a special, privileged partner, a great power at the top table. (After all,
        even British prime ministers have their heads turned.) And Poland did need to
        show France and Germany that the Franco-German couple cannot simply dictate the
        future shape of the EU. But if Poland, a poor country that can barely form a
        government, remains the only obstacle to a reasonable compromise on the
        European constitutional treaty at next month's Brussels summit, that will not
        be a good start to its EU membership. Poland also needs to demonstrate beyond
        any doubt that it wants the whole of the EU to be the privileged interlocutor
        of the US. It must not allow itself to be used by Washington as a tool
        to "divide and rule" in Europe.
        This will also help it to be taken seriously by its European partners. In
        relations between countries, stereotypes die hard. The stereotypes of Poland
        are still quite often negative or, at best, ironically sympathetic (eg, heroic
        crazy cavalry charging Wehrmacht tanks). Despite all the polite public words,
        genuine respect for Poles as serious partners in European policy is still in
        short supply in most of western Europe, perhaps especially in Germany and
        France. And the Poles most west Europeans encounter are still most likely to be
        building workers, cleaning ladies or nannies. They are ambassadors too, and
        most of them very good ones: hard-working, courteous, enterprising. But there
        is still some way to go before western European policymakers take the Poles
        seriously the way they do Italian, Spanish or French colleagues.
        Yet Poland has very important things to bring to the table. It has, for
        example, a deep interest in and experience of the EU's new eastern neighbours.
        It also brings a particular sensibility. Take the execrable treatment of
        prisoners in Iraq, the big news story that has been unfolding while I have been
        here. In the past few days, I've talked to several Polish friends who supported
        the Iraq war as a war of liberation, a war for human rights. For them, it's
        these photographs of humiliation and torture, not the lack of a UN mandate or
        the strange absence of WMDs, that seem to delegitimise the whole enterprise.
        They speak about them with such horror and passion because they know what it's
        like to be powerless and humiliated as a prisoner. Yesterday, one former
        dissident and political prisoner said to me, "Perhaps this will be Poland's
        contribution: to show the British and Americans how you can run prisons in
        which people are not tortured."
        As I write, the Spanish flag has been hoisted before the Tomb of the Unknown
        Soldier, beside the Polish one, presumably for some official visit. Twenty five
        years ago, Spain had only recently emerged from a dictatorship. Now it is a
        prosperous country and a major European power. Poland can be one too, given
        time and wise leadership. But if the story of Poland tells us anything, it is
        that a natio
        • chickenshorts Re: um, republic? 14.05.04, 23:57
          ...that a nation's success or failure is never preordained. "

          Uff, there!
          • chris-joe Re: um, republic? 15.05.04, 12:20
            a very wise text; how 'bout: "Today, Poland's politicians are not resting on
            the country's laurels but tearing them apart." Witty :)
Inne wątki na temat:

Nie masz jeszcze konta? Zarejestruj się


Nakarm Pajacyka