Ekologiczny drapacz chmur , Gdzie ??? oczywiscie w

[sly2015]

Ekologiczny drapacz chmur

Elzbieta Olender 06-04-2005, ostatnia aktualizacja 06-04-2005 17:37

Amerykanie bardzo silnie odciskaja swój slad na srodowisku naturalnym.
Jednak chocby z racji posiadanych pieniedzy stac ich takze na wdrazanie
nowych, proekologicznych technologii. Przyszla siedziba Bank of America w
Nowym Jorku, zaprojektowana przez architektów z Cook & Fox, ma byc
najbardziej ekologicznym wiezowcem swiata. Znaczna czesc uzytego cementu
bedzie wyprodukowana z zuzla wielkopiecowego, odpadków powstajacych przy
produkcji stali. Uchroni to srodowisko przed emisja ok. 50 tys. ton
dwutlenku wegla. Ile to bedzie kosztowalo? 1 mld dolarów - czyli o 6,5 proc.
wiecej niz przy zastosowaniu tradycyjnych rozwiazan. Jednak juz po siedmiu
latach eksploatacji biurowca ta róznica sie zwróci.

1. Polowa energii elektrycznej zuzywanej przez budynek bedzie pochodzila z
odnawialnych zródel, np. z farm wiatrowych.

2. Wentylacja budynku bedzie zasilana powietrzem z zewnatrz filtrowanym
podczas zasysania. Uniknie sie w ten sposób tzw. syndromu chorego budynku
(sick-building syndrom) wystepujacego w pomieszczeniach, w których powietrze
krazy w systemie zamknietym.

3. Okna budynku beda wykonane z podwójnego, izolowanego szkla odbijajacego
swiatlo UV. Takie szyby pozwalaja na utrzymanie nizszej temperatury w lecie
i redukuja kosztu ogrzewania w zimie.

4. 200 zainstalowanych w budynku pisuarów bedzie sie obywalo bez wody.
Dzieki specjalnym, pochlaniajacym odór filtrom zaoszczedzi sie rocznie ponad
145 tys. l wody.

5. Woda deszczowa spadajaca na dach wiezowca bedzie odprowadzana rurami do
umieszczonego pod budynkiem zbiornika, a nastepnie wykorzystywana w
klimatyzacji, do splukiwania toalet i nawadniania trawników.

6. Codziennie 2 t odpadków, produkowanych w biurowcu beda przetwarzane w 75
kilowatów energii elektrycznej. Smieci, m.in. pociety papier i resztki
organiczne ze stolówki, trafiac beda do kadzi, gdzie bakterie zamienia je w
metan zasilajacy turbine.

[yann17]

a protokół z Kioto ????

[uninhibited]

a protokół z Kioto ????

protokul z Kioto i..o to swistek papieru wart tyle co papier toaletowy ,
dowiedz sie jakie sa najnowsze badania , cieniasie!!!!!!!

[kapitalizm]

...wielu podnieca sie protokolem z Kioto zapominajac, ze byl to zwykly
szwindel wymyslony przez Enron:

The Kyoto Protocol – What every NZer should know
Amidst the talk about the benefits that Kyoto Protocol is supposed to promote,
it is perhaps forgotten, especially amongst the greenies, how the treaty that
is supposed to save the world from the evil extravagances of itself was born in
the corridors of very big business.

The name Enron has all but faded from our news pages since the company went
down in flames in 2001 amidst charges of fraud, bribery, price fixing and
graft. But without Enron there would have been no Kyoto Protocol.

About 20 years ago Enron was owner and operator of an interstate network of
natural gas pipelines, and had transformed itself into a billion-dollar-a-day
commodity trader, buying and selling contracts and their derivatives to deliver
natural gas, electricity, internet bandwidth, whatever. The 1990 Clean Air Act
amendments authorized the Environmental Protection Agency to put a cap on how
much pollutant the operator of a fossil-fueled plant was allowed to emit. In
the early 1990s Enron had helped establish the market for, and became the major
trader in, EPA’s $20 billion-per-year sulphur dioxide cap and trade program,
the forerunner of today's proposed carbon credit trade. This commodity exchange
of emission allowances caused Enron’s stock to rapidly rise.

Then came the inevitable question, what next? How about a carbon dioxide cap
and trade program? The problem was that CO2 is not a pollutant, and therefore
the EPA had no authority to cap its emission. Al Gore took office in 1993 and
almost immediately became infatuated with the idea of an international
environmental regulatory regime. He led a U.S. initiative to review new
projects around the world and issue ‘credits’ of so many tons of annual CO2
emission reduction. Under law a tradeable system was required, which was
exactly what Enron also wanted because they were already trading pollutant
credits. Thence Enron vigorously lobbied Clinton and Congress, seeking EPA
regulatory authority over CO2. From 1994 to 1996, the Enron Foundation
contributed nearly $1 million dollars - $990,000 - to the Nature Conservancy,
whose Climate Change Project promotes global warming theories. Enron
philanthropists lavished almost $1.5 million on environmental groups that
support international energy controls to “reduce” global warming. Executives at
Enron worked closely with the Clinton administration to help create a
scaremongering climate science environment because the company believed the
treaty could provide it with a monstrous financial windfall. The plan was that
once the problem (imminent global catastrophe) was in place, the solution
(Enron's services) would be put into operation. It nearly worked.

A lawyer named Christopher Horner was hired who had worked in Senator
Liebermann’s Environment Committee. Horner, employed by Enron, became director
of Relations with the Federal Government. That was in 1997, before the Kyoto
Protocol was drafted. According to Homer, on the second day at the job he was
told that the Number One Objective was to obtain an international treaty that
would impose cuts in CO2 emissions, but at the same time allowed trade with
emission rights. Enron had the biggest natural gas production behind Russia’s
Gazprom. Enron was making a lot of money trading with coal, but they had
already calculated that the profits they would lose with coal would be more
than compensated by the profits derived from its privileged position in other
areas. With clever positioning and anticipation Enron already had bought the
world’s biggest wind power company, GE Wind, from General Electric. They now
also owned the biggest solar power company in the world, in society with Amoco
(now belonging to British Petroleum – BP). Enron then started to finance
everything related to the global warming hype, including grants to scientists –
but asking for results favorable to their interest – “proof” that humans were
responsible for the excessive emissions of CO2 through fossil fuel burning. The
fire of malaise now lit and kindled, only required feeding.

The expressive term 'Baptist-bootlegger' derives from the days of prohibition.
Under prohibition bootleggers and those who transported and supplied illegal
alcohol made fortunes. One such entrepreneur was Joseph Kennedy whose second
son, John, became US President in 1961. The bootleggers had allies in the
Baptists and other teetotalists, who believed that alcohol was a deadly threat
to the social order, and had worked for decades to get prohibition onto the
statute books. The Baptists provided the political cover and the bootleggers
pocketed the proceeds. In public the two groups maintained a great social
distance from each other. Now Enron had positioned itself at the centre of an
awesome Baptist-bootlegger coalition. The gargantuan rents which Enron
energetically sought could be realized only if the Kyoto Protocol became
established as part of US and international law. Ken Lay, Enron's CEO saw Enron
as not only making billions from sales of the natural gas which was to displace
coal as the preferred fuel under the Kyoto commitments, but he realised that as
the main if not the only international and domestic trader in the new barter
world of carbon credits, Enron could realise hitherto unimagined wealth. Such
credits, of course, would only become bankable pieces of paper if governments,
particularly the US Government, established and policed a global policy of
decarbonisation under which a global tax on carbon was to be enforced.

As the movement to establish the Kyoto Protocol developed momentum, it was
necessary for Ken Lay to build up alliances with the green movement including
Greenpeace. A 1998 letter, signed by Lay and a few other bigwigs asked
President Clinton, in essence, to harm the reputations and credibility of
scientists who argued that global warming was an overblown issue, because these
individuals were standing in Enron's way. The letter, dated Sept. 1, asked the
president to shut off the public scientific debate on global warming, which
continues to this date. In particular, it requested Clinton to moderate the
political aspects of this discussion by appointing a bipartisan Blue Ribbon
Commission. The purpose of this commission was clear - high-level trashing of
dissident scientists. Setting up a panel to do this was simple; just look at
the recent issue of Scientific American where four attack dogs were called out
to chew up Bjorn Lomborg. He had the audacity to publish The Skeptic
Environmentalist demonstrating that global warming is overblown. David Bellamy,
the world’s foremost environmentalist also stepped out of line with his widely
printed article “Global Warming? What a load of old Poppycock.” In the same way
that Galileo was forced to publicly utter that the moon had no effect on tides,
or risk further imprisonment by Rome's papal court, so Bellamy under pressure
buckled and has since mild-ified some of his claims.



Enron commissioned its own internal study of global warming science. It turned
out to be largely in agreement with the same scientists that Enron was trying
to shut up. After considering all of the inconsistencies in climate science,
the report concluded: "The very real possibility is that the great climate
alarm could be a false alarm. The anthropogenic warming could well be less than
thought and favorably distributed." One of Enron's major consultants in that
study was NASA scientist James Hansen, who started the whole global warming
mess in 1988 with his bombastic congressional

[kapitalizm]

c.d.

Enron commissioned its own internal study of global warming science. It turned
out to be largely in agreement with the same scientists that Enron was trying
to shut up. After considering all of the inconsistencies in climate science,
the report concluded: "The very real possibility is that the great climate
alarm could be a false alarm. The anthropogenic warming could well be less than
thought and favorably distributed." One of Enron's major consultants in that
study was NASA scientist James Hansen, who started the whole global warming
mess in 1988 with his bombastic congressional testimony. Recently he published
a paper in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences predicting
exactly the same inconsequential amount of warming in the next 50 years as the
scientists that Enron wanted to gag. They were a decade ahead of NASA. True to
its plan, Enron never made its own findings public, self-censoring them while
it pleaded with the Bush administration for a cap on carbon dioxide emissions
that it could broker. That pleading continues today

[kapitalizm]

c.d.

Now it is surely time to face the facts: there isn't a snowflake-in-hell's
chance of global warming altering real life. But the failure of the greens is
not just with the public. While playing the climate-change card at the G8
Summit, the final Gleneagles' declaration shows that the leaders of the
developed world have no intention of sacrificing growth and economic success
for an ascetic global warming religion. To quote Michael McCarthy, the
environment editor of the Independent: 'The failed agenda that Greenpeace,
Friends of the Earth, the World Wide Fund for Nature and others were
complaining of - that the US has still not agreed to cut its carbon dioxide
emissions - was the green groups' own agenda, not the British government's. At
G8 the idea of capping greenhouse gas emissions was cleverly replaced by an
emphasis on technological innovation and imaginative development. The Kyoto
Protocol is effectively dead.



refs
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enron
archive.columbiatribune.com/2002/Feb/20020226Comm007.asp
www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=26124
www.lavoisier.com.au/papers/articles/EvansEnron.html
www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=204
ff.org/centers/csspp/opeds/80320040418_landrith.html
www.spiked-online.com/Printable/0000000CAC72.htm
www.niwa.co.nz/pubs/ar/2004/14ncc.pdf

[kapitalizm]

...a tu o nonsensie zwanym Global Warming:

www.predictweather.com/global_warming/index.asp

[kapitalizm]

...protokul z Kioto, link:

www.predictweather.com/articles.asp?ID=36

zdecyduj sie!! jesli probujesz tlumaczyc

[bam_buko]

toalety z woda czy bez???

4. 200 zainstalowanych w budynku pisuarów bedzie sie obywalo bez wody.
Dzieki specjalnym, pochlaniajacym odór filtrom zaoszczedzi sie rocznie ponad
145 tys. l wody.

5. Woda deszczowa spadajaca na dach wiezowca bedzie odprowadzana rurami do
umieszczonego pod budynkiem zbiornika, a nastepnie wykorzystywana w
klimatyzacji, do splukiwania toalet i nawadniania trawników.

[wujcio44]

bam_buko napisał:

>
> toalety z woda czy bez???
>
> 4. 200 zainstalowanych w budynku pisuarów bedzie sie obywalo bez wody.
> Dzieki specjalnym, pochlaniajacym odór filtrom zaoszczedzi sie rocznie ponad
> 145 tys. l wody.
>
> 5. Woda deszczowa spadajaca na dach wiezowca bedzie odprowadzana rurami do
> umieszczonego pod budynkiem zbiornika, a nastepnie wykorzystywana w
> klimatyzacji, do splukiwania toalet i nawadniania trawników.

To nie takie trudne do zrozumienia. Mała potrzeba bez spłukiwania, duża potrzeba
ze spłukiwaniem.

Swietny pomysl , ale na to stac jedynie USA

[wrocek2015]

Bo euro-arabia zaraz by chciala doplaty z kieszeni podatnika - nieudacznicy
cholerni !!!! Nic niepotrafia zrobic jak nalezy !!!!!!!!!!!!

[samsone]

A 5 krotne mycie stop czym? bo to najbardziej bambuko interesuje.